Online dating is common in the United States. We draw on communicated narrative sense-making (CNSM) theory to explore how online daters reflect on the development of their relationships. Using an oral history interview protocol, we collected courtship stories from 50 U.S. adults who were engaged or married to a partner that they met in online dating. We coded their stories for common narrative arcs and counter narratives that they used to describe their courtship. Our findings uncovered ten narrative arcs capturing different trajectories of relationship development. Embedded within these stories were counter narratives that participants used to challenge traditional courtship ideologies. Implications for CNSM theory, theories of relationship development, and online dating research are discussed.
BaileyB. L. (1988). From front porch to back seat: Courtship in the twentieth century. Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BaxterL. A.BraithwaiteD. O.NicholsonJ. H. (1999). Turning points in the development of blended families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599163002
3.
BochnerA. P.EllisC.Tillmann-HealyL. M. (1997). Relationships as stories. Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed. pp. 307–324). John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BuehlmanK. T.GottmanJ. M.KatzL. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295
5.
CameronJ. J.CurryE. (2020). Gender roles and date context in hypothetical scripts for a woman and a man on a first date in the twenty-first century. Sex Roles, 82(1), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01056-6
6.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
7.
CusterL.HolmbergD.BlairK.OrbuchT. L. (2008). “So how did you two meet?” Narratives of relationship initiation. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 453–470). Psychology Press.
8.
DensonS. (2022). Retrospective storytelling, meaning-making, and generativity (the passing down of wisdom): Black intergenerational stories about love. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
9.
DunlopW. L.BühlerJ.MaghsoodiA.HarakeN.WilkinsonD.McAdamsD. P. (2021). The stories couples live by. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(2), 690–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520969900
10.
HolmbergD.MacKenzieS. (2002). So far, so good: Scripts for romantic relationship development as predictors of relational well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502196003
11.
HolmbergD.OrbuchT. L.VeroffJ. (2004). Thrice told tales: Married couples tell their stories. Routledge.
12.
HorstmanH. K.BohanekJ.ŁapińskaE.WatsonO.CierpkaA.MałekK. (2024). “Living the stories of your great-grandmother”: Making sense of Russia’s war in Ukraine through Polish intergenerational family storytelling. Communication Monographs, 1(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2024.2349570
13.
KarandashevV. (2015). A cultural perspective on romantic love. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1135
14.
KneeC. R.BushA. L. (2008). Relationship beliefs and their role in romantic relationship initiation. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 471–485). Psychology Press.
15.
Koenig KellasJ. (2018). Communicated narrative sense-making theory. In BraithwaiteD.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed. pp. 62–74). Routledge.
16.
Koenig KellasJ. (2022). Communicated narrative sense-making theory: Bridging storytelling, relationships, and well-being. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 117–129). Routledge.
17.
Koenig KellasJ.Kranstuber HorstmanH. K. (2015). Communicated narrative sense- making: Understanding family narratives, storytelling, and the construction of meaning through a communicative lens. In TurnerL. H.WestR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family communication (pp. 76–90). Sage.
18.
KranstuberH. H. (2012). “Love stories aren’t always like the movies”: The positive and negative relational implications of inherited parental courtship stories. In Koenig KellasJ. (Ed.), Family storytelling: Negotiating identity, teaching lessons and making meaning (pp. 57–78). Routledge.
19.
LeverenzA.BohanekJ. G.FivushR. (2023). Love, actually: Cultural narratives expressed in emerging adults’ stories of romantic relationships. Narrative Inquiry.
20.
MeretojaH. (2020). A dialogic of counter-narratives. In LuegK.LundholtM. W. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of counter-narratives (pp. 30–42). Routledge.
NelsonH. L. (2001). Damaged identities, narrative repair: Cornell University Press.
23.
OrbuchT. L.VeroffJ.HolmbergD. (1993). Becoming a married couple: The emergence of meaning in the first years of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(1), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.2307/352764
24.
ParkinR. (2021). Arranged marriages: Whose choice and why? Reflections on the principles underlying spouse selection worldwide. History and Anthropology, 32(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2021.1905255
25.
PortolanL.McAlisterJ. (2022). Jagged love: Narratives of romance on dating apps during COVID-19. Sexuality & Culture, 26(1), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09896-9
26.
RochadiatA. M. P.TongS. T.NovakJ. M. (2018). Online dating and courtship among Muslim American women: Negotiating technology, religious identity, and culture. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1618–1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817702396
27.
RosenfeldM. J.ThomasR. J.HausenS. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116
28.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
29.
SharabiL. L. (2024). The enduring effect of Internet dating: Meeting online and the road to marriage. Communication Research, 51(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221127498
30.
SharabiL. L.Dorrance HallE. (2024). The online dating effect: Where a couple meets predicts the quality of their marriage. Computers in Human Behavior, 150(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023/107973
31.
TracyS. J. (2018). A phronetic iterative approach to data analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 19(2), 61–76.
32.
TracyS. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
