Is unit cohesion a double-edged sword? A moderated mediation model of combat exposure,work stressors,and marital satisfaction

Abstract

Guided by the stress process perspective, this study examined if combat exposure was indirectly associated with marital satisfaction through work performance stress. Additionally, we tested whether unit cohesion served as a moderator of this indirect effect. Data were drawn from 1,122 married Soldiers who participated in the All-Army Study component of the Army STARRS study, a probabilistic sample of Army Soldiers. Indicative of stress proliferation and spillover, our results showed that combat exposure may negatively impact marital satisfaction through work performance stress, but the pathways of this indirect effect varied as a function of unit cohesion. Consistent with the stress buffering hypothesis, unit cohesion buffered the positive association between combat exposure and work performance stress for Soldiers reporting higher levels unit cohesion, such that this association was no longer statistically significant. However, for Soldiers reporting higher levels of unit cohesion, the negative association between work performance stress and martial satisfaction was exacerbated but was not statistically significant for those reporting lower levels of unit cohesion. The results underscore the importance of understanding the contextual nature of relational resources within the stress process framework.

Keywords

Military marriage unit cohesion combat exposure work-family stress

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Knopp

Rhoades

Stanley

Markman

(2018). Between- and within-subject associations of PTSD symptom clusters and marital functioning in military couples. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 32(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000363

Armistead‐Jehle

Johnston

S. L.

Wade

N. G.

Ecklund

C. J.

(2011). Posttraumatic stress in US Marines: The role of unit cohesion and combat exposure. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00063.x

Brady

J. M.

Hammer

L. B.

Mohr

C. D.

Bodner

T. E.

(2020). Supportive supervisor training improves family relationships among employee and spouse dyads. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000264

Breslau

Setodji

C. M.

Vaughan

C. A.

(2016). Is cohesion within military units associated with post-deployment behavioral and mental health outcomes? Journal of Affective Disorders, 198(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.053

Britt

T. W.

Dawson

C. R.

(2005). Predicting work–family conflict from workload, job attitudes, group attributes, and health: A longitudinal study. Military Psychology, 17(3), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1703_5

Britt

T. W.

Dickinson

J. M.

Moore

Castro

C. A.

Adler

A. B.

(2007). Correlates and consequences of morale versus depression under stressful conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.34

Brown

D. J.

Ferris

D. L.

Heller

Keeping

L. M.

(2007). Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003

Campbell

D. J.

Nobel

O. B. Y.

(2009). Occupational stressors in military service: A review and framework. Military Psychology, 21(sup2), S47–S67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600903249149

Campbell-Sills

Flynn

P. J.

Choi

K. W.

T. H. H.

Aliaga

P. A.

Broshek

Jain

Kessler

R. C.

Stein

M. B.

Ursano

R. J.

Bliese

P. D.

(2022). Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: Is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers? Psychological Medicine, 52(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001786

10.

Charbonneau

Wood

V. M.

(2018). Antecedents and outcomes of unit cohesion and affective commitment to the Army. Military Psychology, 30(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2017.1420974

11.

Dawson

J. F.

(2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7

12.

Flood

Keegan

R. J.

(2022). Cognitive resilience to psychological stress in military personnel. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 809003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809003

13.

Fors Brandebo

Börjesson

Hilmarsson

(2022). Longitudinal studies on cohesion in a military context–A systematic review. Military Psychology: The Official Journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 34(6), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2022.2041995

14.

Gutierrez

I. A.

Adler

A. B.

(2022). Organizational context as a predictor of positive adjustment among soldiers following combat deployment. Occupational Health Science, 6(3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-022-00120-0

15.

Hayes

A. F.

(2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683

16.

Joel

Eastwick

P. W.

Allison

C. J.

Arriaga

X. B.

Baker

Z. G.

Bar-Kalifa

Bergeron

Birnbaum

G. E.

Brock

R. L.

Brumbaugh

C. C.

Carmichael

C. L.

Chen

Clarke

Cobb

R. J.

Coolsen

M. K.

Davis

de Jong

D. C.

Debrot

DeHaas

E. C.

Wolf

(2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(32), 19061–19071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917036117

17.

Joint Mental Health Advisory Team 7 (J‐MHAT 7) . (2011). Operation Enduring freedom 2010 Afghanistan. https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA543997.xhtml

18.

Karney

B. R.

Trail

T. E.

(2017). Associations between prior deployments and marital satisfaction among Army couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12329

19.

Kavanagh

(2005). Stress and performance: A review of the literature and its applicability to the military (RAND national security research division technical report No. 20051026116). Library of Congress Cataloging.

20.

Kessler

R. C.

Calabrese

J. R.

Farley

P. A.

Gruber

M. J.

Jewell

M. A.

Katon

Keck

P. E.

Nierenberg

A. A.

Sampson

N. A.

Shear

M. K.

Shillington

A. C.

Stein

M. B.

Thase

M. E.

Wittchen

H. U.

Wittchen

H. U.

(2013). Composite International Diagnostic Interview screening scales for DSM–IV anxiety and mood disorders. Psychological Medicine, 43(8), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002334

21.

King

L. A.

King

D. W.

Vogt

D. S.

Knight

Samper

R. E.

(2006). Deployment risk and resilience inventory: A collection of measures for studying deployment-related experiences of military personnel and veterans. Military Psychology, 18(2), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1802_1

22.

King

Wickrama

K. K.

O'Neal

C. W.

Lorenz

F. O.

(2018). Adverse work experiences and marital outcomes in middle years: Role of self‐esteem. Personal Relationships, 25(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12227

23.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

24.

Knobloch

L. K.

Monk

J. K.

MacDermid Wadsworth

S. M.

(2023). Relationship maintenance among military couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 734–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221105025

25.

Lang

K. M.

Little

T. D.

(2018). Principled missing data treatments. Prevention Science, 19(3), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0644-5

26.

Layman

P. G.

Sanford

Myers

D. R.

Dolan

Ellor

J. W.

Morissette

S. B.

Whitacre

Crow

(2019). Intimate partner cohesion and military unit cohesion: Different types of interpersonal relationships each uniquely predict soldier wellbeing. Military Psychology, 31(3), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2019.1579606

27.

Nohe

Sonntag

(2014). Work–family conflict, social support, and turnover intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.03.007

28.

O'Neal

C. W.

Lucier-Greer

Duncan

Mallette

Arnold

A. L.

Mancini

J. A.

(2018). Vulnerability and resilience within military families: Deployment experiences, reintegration, and family functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(10), 3250–3261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1149-6

29.

Pearlin

L. I.

(1999). The stress process revisited: Reflections on concepts and their interrelationships. In Carol

L. S.

Phelan

J. C.

Bierman

(Eds.), Handbook of sociology of mental health (pp. 395–415). Plenum Publishers.

30.

Pflieger

J. C.

Richardson

S. M.

Stander

V. A.

Allen

E. S.

(2022). Risk and protective factors predictive of marital instability in U.S. military couples. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 36(5), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000949

31.

Preacher

K. J.

Rucker

D. D.

Hayes

A. F.

(2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316

32.

Reed-Fitzke

Lucier-Greer

(2020). The buffering effect of relationships on combat exposure, military performance, and mental health of U.S. Military soldiers: A vantage point for CFTs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12402

33.

Repetti

Wang

S. W.

(2017). Effects of job stress on family relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.010

34.

RTI International (2008). Department of Defense Survey of Health Related Behaviors Among Active Duty Military Personnel: A component of the Defense Lifestyle Assessment Program. Research Triangle Park, NC.

35.

Sabourin

Valois

Lussier

(2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15

36.

Siebold

G. L.

(2007). The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x06294173

37.

Spanier

G. B.

(1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547

38.

Tanielian

Haycox

L. H.

Schell

T. L.

Marshall

G. N.

Burnam

M. A.

Eibner

Vaiana

M. E.

(2008). Invisible wounds of war. Summary and recommendations for addressing psychological and cognitive injuries. Rand Corp.

39.

Westman

(2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54(6), 717–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701546002

40.

Wilkins

Lang

Norman

(2011). Synthesis of the psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL) military, civilian, and specific versions. Depression and Anxiety, 28(7), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20837

41.

Williams

Brown

J. M.

Bray

R. M.

Anderson Goodell

E. M.

Rae Olmsted

Adler

A. B.

(2016). Unit cohesion, resilience, and mental health of soldiers in basic combat training. Military Psychology, 28(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000120

42.

Woodall

K. A.

Richardson

S. M.

Pflieger

J. C.

Hawkins

S. A.

Stander

V. A.

(2020). Influence of work and life stressors on marital quality among dual and nondual military couples. Journal of Family Issues, 41(11), 2045–2064. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20903377

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB