Emotional empathy has been linked to prosocial behaviors and is deemed crucial for parenting and caring for infants. This study examined whether emotional empathy (dispositional and in response to infant crying) is associated with sensitive responsiveness, as observed in 221 heterosexual couples (half of whom were expecting their first child) during a standardized caregiving situation. Simulators resembling real infants were used. Caregiving performed by each partner individually and as a couple was observed using the Ainsworth sensitivity scale. The partners rated their own empathy and their perceived partner’s empathy toward the infant simulator. The Polish version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index was used to measure dispositional emotional empathy (empathic concern, EC; personal distress, PD). Multilevel modeling showed that self-reported and partner-reported empathy elicited by the infant simulator mediated the association between dispositional empathic concern and sensitive responsiveness during caretaking. Women were more empathic and responsive while caring for the infant simulator, and couple sensitive responsiveness was predicted by higher dispositional EC and lower PD in women but not in men. Our findings suggest that dispositional empathy and empathic reactions toward an infant simulator might translate into better adjustment to parenthood and more responsive parenting and coparenting.
AguinisH.EdwardsJ. R.BradleyK. J. (2017). Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115627498
2.
AinsworthM. D. S.BellS. M.StaytonD. F. (1974). Infant-mother attachment and social development: Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In RichardsM. P. M. (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world. (pp. 99–135). Cambridge University Press.
3.
AnD.Bendel-StenzelL. C.KochanskaG. (2022). Negative internal working models as mechanisms that link mothers’ and fathers’ personality with their parenting: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 90(6), 1004–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12711
4.
Anikiej-WiczenbachP.KaźmierczakM. (2021). Validation of the parental responsiveness scale. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.104800
5.
Anikiej-WiczenbachP.KaźmierczakM.CzerwińskiS. (2024). Exploring the key drivers of responsive parenting in mothers and fathers – observed and self-reported responsiveness. Health Psychology Report, 12(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/181511
6.
Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Ra AlinkL.BiroS.VoorthuisA.Van IjzendoornM. H. (2015). The Leiden infant simulator sensitivity assessment (LISSA): Parenting an infant simulator as your own baby. Infant and Child Development, 24(3), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1905
7.
Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IjzendoornM. H. (2023). Sensitive responsiveness in expectant and new fathers. Current Opinion in Psychology, 50, Article 101580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101580
8.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003499
9.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), Social neuroscience. The social neuroscience of empathy. (pp. 3–15). MIT Press.
10.
BatsonC. D.BatsonJ. G.SlingsbyJ. K.HarrellK. L.PeeknaH. M.ToddR. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413
11.
BoormanR. J.CreedyD. K.FenwickJ.MuurlinkO. (2019). Empathy in pregnant women and new mothers: A systematic literature review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1525695
12.
BorelliJ. L.SladeA.PettitC.ShaiD. (2020). I “get” you, babe: Reflective functioning in partners transitioning to parenthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(6), 1785–1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520905641
13.
CrastaD.RoggeR. D.ManiaciM. R.ReisH. T. (2021). Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000986
14.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791
15.
DavidovM.GrusecJ. E. (2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00855.x
16.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
17.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
18.
DavisM. H. (2004). Empathy: Negotiating the border between self and other. In LeachC. W.TiedensL. Z. (Eds.), The social life of emotions. (pp. 19–42). Cambridge University Press.
19.
DavisM. H. (2006). Empathy. In StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H. (Eds.), Handbooks of sociology and social research. (pp. 443–466). Springer.
20.
DavisM. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. (pp. 282–306). Oxford University Press.
21.
EisenbergN.EggumN. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy. (pp. 71–83). MIT Press.
22.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A.MurphyB.KarbonM.MaszkP.SmithM.O'BoyleC.SuhK. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.776
EstleinR.ShaiD. (2023). Actor and partner effects of prenatal coparenting behavior on postpartum depression in first-time parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(11), 3540–3562. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231179080
25.
EuserS.AlinkL. R. A.PannebakkerF.VogelsT.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IjzendoornM. H. (2013). The prevalence of child maltreatment in The Netherlands across a 5-year period. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37(10), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.004
26.
FabiS.WeberL. A.LeutholdH. (2019). Empathic concern and personal distress depend on situational but not dispositional factors. PLoS One, 14(11), Article e0225102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225102
27.
FeldmanR. (2012). Parent–infant synchrony: A biobehavioral model of mutual influences in the formation of affiliative bonds. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00660.x
28.
FinkelE. J.SimpsonJ. A.EastwickP. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
HoffmanM. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
31.
Kadosh-LaorT.Israeli-RanL.ShalevI.UzefovskyF. (2023). Empathy and parenthood: The moderating role of maternal trait empathy on parental burnout. British Journal of Psychology, 114(3), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12640
32.
KaźmierczakM. (2015). Couple empathy – the mediator of attachment styles for partners adjusting to parenthood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 33(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2014.974148
33.
KaźmierczakM.PawlickaP. (2019). SER-PD–Polish adaptation of the My Emotions Scale for the assessment of parents’ emotional reactions to child’s crying. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 7(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.76188
34.
KaźmierczakM.PawlickaP.AnikiejP.ŁadaA.Michałek-KwiecieńJ. (2022a). Parental negative emotionality and emotional reactions to child’s crying: The mediating role of child’s temperament. Early Child Development and Care, 192(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1753719
35.
KaźmierczakM.PawlickaP.Anikiej-WiczenbachP.Łada-MaśkoA. B.KiełbratowskaB.RybickaM.KotłowskaA.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IjzendoornM. H. (2021). Empathy and hormonal changes as predictors of sensitive responsiveness towards infant crying: A study protocol. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094815
KaźmierczakM.Van IjzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. (2022b). Do empathy and oxytocin predict responsiveness to a crying infant simulator in expecting and non-expecting couples? A multilevel study. Attachment & Human Development, 24(5), 624–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2022.2063911
38.
LeerkesE.SommersS.BailesL. (2022). The validity of prenatal assessments of mothers’ emotional, cognitive, and physiological reactions to infant cry. Parenting, science and practice, 22(4), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2021.1975122
39.
LeerkesE. M. (2010). Predictors of maternal sensitivity to infant distress. Parenting, science and practice, 10(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190903290840
40.
LeerkesE. M.BailesL.SwinglerM. M.AugustineM. A.NorcrossP. L. (2021). A comprehensive model of women’s social cognition and responsiveness to infant crying: Integrating personality, emotion, executive function, and sleep. Infant Behavior and Development, 64, Article 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101577
41.
LeerkesE. M.QuJ. (2020). The my emotions questionnaire: A self-report of mothers’ emotional responses to infant crying. Infant Mental Health Journal, 41(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21830
42.
LeerkesE. M.SuppleA. J.O’BrienM.CalkinsS. D.HaltiganJ. D.WongM. S.FortunaK. (2015). Antecedents of maternal sensitivity during distressing tasks: Integrating attachment, social information processing, and psychobiological perspectives. Child Development, 86(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12288
43.
LeerkesE. M.WeaverJ. M.O'BrienM. (2012). Differentiating maternal sensitivity to infant distress and non-distress. Parenting, science and practice, 12(2-3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2012.683353
44.
LemeriseE. A.ArsenioW. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00124
45.
LinH. C.McFatterR. (2012). Empathy and distress: Two distinct but related emotions in response to infant crying. Infant Behavior and Development, 35(4), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.08.001
46.
NgX.NgL. Y.GabrieliG.AzhariA.NeohM. J.EspositoG. (2021). An fNIRS investigation of masculinity, femininity, and sex on nonparents’ empathic response to infant cries. Brain Sciences, 11(5), 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050635
47.
PangC.LiW.ZhouY.GaoT.HanS. (2023). Are women more empathetic than men? Questionnaire and EEG estimations of sex/gender differences in empathic ability. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 18(1), nsad008. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad008
48.
ParsonsC. E.YoungK. S.ParsonsE.SteinA.KringelbachM. L. (2012). Listening to infant distress vocalizations enhances effortful motor performance. Acta Paediatrica, 101(4), e189–e191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02554.x
49.
PruittM. M.McKayE. R.LelakowskaG.EkasN. V. (2020). The infant simulator paradigm with non-parents: Attitudes, physiology, and observed caregiving. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(9), 2515–2529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01643-x
50.
RasmussenH. F.CornerG. W.MargolinG. (2019). Young adult couples’ behavioral and physiological responses to the infant simulator: A preliminary illustration of coparenting. Infant Behavior and Development, 56, Article 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.04.004
51.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
52.
ReijneveldS. A.Van der WalM. F.BrugmanE.SingR. A. H.Verloove-VanhorickS. P. (2004). Infant crying and abuse. Lancet (London, England), 364(9442), 1340–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17191-2
53.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
54.
ShaiD. (2019). The inconsolable doll task: Prenatal coparenting behavioral dynamics under stress predicting child cognitive development at 18 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 56, Article 101254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.04.003
55.
ShaiD.BergnerR. (2021). Prenatal coparenting under high arousal predicts infants’ cognitive development at 18 months. In Kuersten-HoganR.McHaleJ. P. (Eds.), Prenatal family dynamics: Couple and coparenting relationships during and postpregnancy. (pp. 107–128). Springer.
56.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM.GrossJ. T.SternJ. A.CassidyJ. A. (2016). A lifespan perspective on attachment and care for others: Empathy, altruism, and prosocial behavior. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 878–916). Guilford.
57.
SpinradT. L.EisenbergN. (2019). Socialization of moral emotions and behavior. In LaibleD. J.CarloG.WalkerL. M. P.. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development (pp. 57–72). Oxford University Press.
58.
SternJ. A.BorelliJ. L.SmileyP. A. (2015). Assessing parental empathy: A role for empathy in child attachment. Attachment and Human Development, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2014.969749
59.
TingleyD.YamamotoT.HiroseK.KeeleL.ImaiK. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05
60.
VerhofstadtL.DevoldreI.BuysseA.StevensM.HinnekensC.IckesW.DavisM. (2016). The role of cognitive and affective empathy in spouses’ support interactions: An observational study. PLoS One, 11(2), Article e0149944. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149944
61.
VoorthuisA.OutD.Van der VeenR.BhandariR.Van IjzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J. (2013). One doll fits all: Validation of the Leiden infant simulator sensitivity assessment (LISSA). Attachment and Human Development, 15(5-6), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.820897
62.
VuoriainenE.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.HuffmeijerR.Van IjzendoornM. H.PeltolaM. J. (2022). Processing children’s faces in the parental brain: A meta-analysis of ERP studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 136, Article 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104604
63.
WinczewskiL. A.BowenJ. D.CollinsN. L. (2016). Is empathic accuracy enough to facilitate responsive behavior in dyadic interaction? Distinguishing ability from motivation. Psychological Science, 27(3), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624491
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
