Attachment theory provides an informative theoretical description of how prosocial behaviors in response to the distress of others may be socialized. This study aimed to investigate associations between attachment security to mothers, fathers, closest grandparents and peers, and young adolescents’ (a) prosocial responses to others’ distress and (b) global prosocial behaviors, via the mediation of empathic concern. Cross-sectional survey data were obtained from 520 adolescents (aged 11–14) from nine schools in Cape Town, South Africa. Structural equation modeling revealed that a model in which all paths from the attachment variables were routed through empathic concern was superior to a model which proposed only direct effects of attachment on prosocial behavior. Peer and grandparent attachment were significantly associated, through empathic concern, with self-reported helping in response to others’ distress. For teacher-reported global prosocial behavior, the indirect effects of peer and grandparent attachment failed to reach significance. The results provide theoretical insight into the association between secure attachments and prosocial behavior, and highlight the importance of relationships with friends and grandparents in early adolescence.
AllenJ. P.MigaE. M. (2010). Attachment in adolescence: A move to the level of emotion regulation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407509360898
2.
AndrettaJ. R.RamirezA. M.BarnesM. E.OdomT.Roberson-AdamsS.WoodlandM. H. (2015). Perceived parental security profiles in African American adolescents involved in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000105
3.
ArmsdenG. (1986). Attachment to parents and peers in late adolescence: Relationships to affective status, self-esteem, and coping with loss, threat and challenges[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington.
4.
ArmsdenG.GreenbergM. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological wellbeing in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202939
5.
BeierJ. S.GrossJ. T.BrettB. E.SternJ. A.MartinD. R.CassidyJ. (2019). Helping, sharing, and comforting in young children: Links to individual differences in attachment. Child Development, 90(2), e273–e289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13100
6.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
7.
CapraraG. V.Luengo KanacriB. P.ZuffianòA.GerbinoM.PastorelliC. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: Direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2211–2229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0293-1
8.
CarloG.HausmannA.ChristiansenS.RandallB. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272431602239132
9.
CarloG.KnightG. P.McGinleyM.HayesR. (2011). The roles of parental inductions, moral emotions, and moral cognitions in prosocial tendencies among Mexican American and European American early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 757–781. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272431610373100
10.
CarloG.KnightG. P.McGinleyM.ZamboangaB. L.JarvisL. H. (2010). The multidimensionality of prosocial behaviors and evidence of measurement equivalence in Mexican American and European American early adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00637.x
11.
CarloG.McGinleyM.HayesR. C.MartinezM. M. (2012). Empathy as a mediator of the relations between parent and peer attachment and prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors in Mexican American college students. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407511431181
12.
CarloG.MestreM. V.SamperP.TurA.ArmentaB. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010
13.
CarloG.Padilla-WalkerL. M.NielsonM. G. (2015). Longitudinal bidirectional relations between adolescents’ sympathy and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1771–1777. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000056
14.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85–104.
15.
DunfieldK. A.KuhlmeierV. A. (2013). Classifying prosocial behavior: Children’s responses to instrumental need, emotional distress, and material desire. Child Development, 84, 1766–1776. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12075
16.
EisenbergN. (2009). Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 129–148). American Psychological Association.
17.
EisenbergN.SpinradT. L. (2014). Multidimensionality of prosocial behavior: Rethinking the conceptualization and development of prosocial behavior. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 17–39). Oxford University Press.
18.
EisenbergN.SpinradT. L.MorrisA. (2014). Empathy-related responding in children. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 184–207). Psychology Press.
19.
El MallahS. (2019). Conceptualization and measurement of adolescent prosocial behavior: Looking back and moving forward. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(S1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12476
20.
GerbinoM.ZuffianòA.EisenbergN.CastellaniV.Luengo KanacriB. P.PastorelliC.CapraraG. V. (2017). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior predicts good grades beyond intelligence and personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12309
GrohA. M.Pasco FearonR. M.Van IJzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.RoismanG. I. (2017). Attachment in the early life course: Meta-analytic evidence for its role in socioemotional development. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12213
23.
GrossJ. T.SternJ. A.BrettB. E.CassidyJ. (2017). The multifaceted nature of prosocial behavior in children: Links with attachment theory and research. Social Development, 26, 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12242
24.
GrusecJ. E.DavidovM. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81, 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x
25.
HallK.MokomaneZ. (2018). The shape of children’s families and households: A demographic overview. In HallK.RichterL.MokomaneZ.LakeL. (Eds.), South African child gauge 2018 (pp. 32–45). Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town. https://www.ci.uct.ac.za/ci/child-gauge/2018
26.
HarperJ. M.Padilla-WalkerL. M.JensenA. C. (2016). Do siblings matter independent of both parents and friends? Sympathy as a mediator between sibling relationship quality and adolescent outcomes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12174
HawesD. J.DaddsM. R. (2004). Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 644–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01427.x
29.
HawkS. T.KeijsersL.BranjeS. J. T.Van der GraaffJ.De WiedM.MeeusW. (2013). Examining the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) among early and late adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.696080
30.
HendersonC. E.HayslipB.SandersL. M.LoudenL. (2009). Grandmother-grandchild relationship quality predicts psychological adjustment among youth from divorced families. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192513X09334913
31.
KellerH.BardK.MorelliG.ChaudharyN.VicedoM.Rosabal-CotoM.ScheideckerG.MurrayM.GottliebA. (2018). The myth of universal sensitive responsiveness: Comment on Mesman et al. (2017). Child Development, 89, 1921–1928. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13031
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
34.
LaghiF.D’AlessioM.PalliniS.BaioccoR. (2009). Attachment representations and time perspective in adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 90, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9249-0
35.
LaibleD. J.CarloG.RaffaelliM. (2000). The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005169004882
36.
LaibleD. J.CarloG.RoeschS. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.05.005
37.
LevittM. J. (2005). Social relations in childhood and adolescence: The convoy model perspective. Human Development, 48, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083214
38.
LiX.BianC.ChenY.HuangJ.MaY.TangL.YanQYeX.TangmJ.YuY. (2015). Indirect aggression and parental attachment in early adolescence: Examining the role of perspective taking and empathetic concern. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.008
39.
MalondaE.LlorcaA.MesuradoB.SamperP.MestreM. V. (2019). Parents or peers? Predictors of prosocial behavior and aggression: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02379
40.
MarkiewiczD.LawfordH.DoyleA. B.HaggartN. (2006). Developmental differences in adolescents’ and young adults’ use of mothers, fathers, best friends, and romantic partners to fulfill attachment needs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9014-5
41.
MesmanJ.Van IJzendoornM. H.Sagi-SchwartzA. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852–857). Guilford Press.
42.
MesuradoB.DistefanoM. J.RobioloG.RichaudM. C. (2019). The Hero program: Development and initial validation of an intervention program to promote prosocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 2566–2584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518793224
43.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2013). The role of attachment security in adolescent and adult close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 66–89). Oxford University Press.
44.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2015). An attachment perspective on prosocial attitudes and behavior. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 209–230). Oxford University Press.
MillerC. F.KochelK. P.WheelerL. A.UpdegraffK. A.FabesR. A.MartinC. L.HanishL. D. (2017). The efficacy of a relationship building intervention in 5th grade. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.01.002
47.
NieY.-G.LiJ.-B.VazsonyiA. T. (2016). Self-control mediates the associations between parental attachment and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.077
48.
NiezinkL. W.SieroF. W.DijkstraP.BuunkA. P.BareldsD. P. H. (2012). Empathic concern: Distinguishing between tenderness and sympathy. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9276-z
49.
OldfieldJ.HumphreyN.HebronJ. (2016). The role of parental and peer attachment relationships and school connectedness in predicting adolescent mental health outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 21, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12108
50.
PaceC. S.San MartiniP.ZavattiniG. C. (2011). The factor structure of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA): A survey of Italian adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.006
51.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (2014). The study of prosocial behavior: Past, present, and future. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press.
52.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG.NielsonM. G. (2015). Does helping keep teens protected? Longitudinal bidirectional relations between prosocial behavior and problem behavior. Child Development, 86, 1759–1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12411
53.
PanfileT. M.LaibleD. J. (2012). Attachment security and child’s empathy: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2012.0003
54.
ProfeW. B. (2016). Adolescents’ responses to the distress of others: The influence of multiple attachment figures via empathic concern[Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town]. https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/22999
55.
ProfeW.WildL. G. (2017). Mother, father, and grandparent involvement: Associations with adolescent mental health and substance use. Journal of Family Issues, 38(6), 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15583069
56.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing[Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
57.
RaudinoA.FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J. (2013). The quality of parent-child relationships in adolescence is associated with poor adult psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.002
58.
RevelleW. (2019). Package psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research(Version 1.9.12) [Computer software]. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University. https://personality-project.org/r/psych/
59.
RoseK.HawesD. J.HuntC. J. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of a friendship skills intervention on adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035827
RubinK. H.BowkerJ. C.McDonaldK.MenzerM. (2013). Peer relationships in childhood. In ZelazoP. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 242–275). Oxford University Press.
62.
ScharfM.MayselessO. (2007). Putting eggs in more than one basket: A new look at developmental processes of attachment in adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 117, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.191
63.
SchwarzB.MayerB.TrommsdorffG.Ben-AriehA.FriedlmeierM.LubiewskaK.MishraR.PeltzerK. (2012). Does the importance of parent and peer relationships for adolescents’ life satisfaction vary across cultures?Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611419508
64.
SeibertA. C.KernsK. A. (2009). Attachment figures in middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409103872
65.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
66.
SternJ. A.CassidyJ. (2018). Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences. Developmental Review, 47, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.09.002
67.
StoneL. L.OttenR.EngelsR. C. M. E.VermulstA. A.JanssensJ. M. A. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2
68.
ThompsonK. L.GulloneE. (2008). Prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescents: An investigation into associations with attachment and empathy. Anthrozoös, 21, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708X305774
69.
Van der GraaffJ.CarloG.CrocettiE.KootH. M.BranjeS. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
70.
Van HeerdenA.WildL. G. (2018). Grandparent support and mental and behavioural health in middle childhood. Social Development, 27, 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12275
71.
Van IJzendoornM. H.SagiA.LambermonM. W. E. (1992). The multiple caretaker paradox: Data from Holland and Israel. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1992(57), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219925703
72.
WangM.WangJ.DengX.ChenW. (2019). Why are empathic children more liked by peers? The mediating roles of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.029
73.
WildL. G. (2018). Grandparental involvement and South African adolescents’ emotional and behavioural health: A summary of research findings. Contemporary Social Science, 13(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1422536
74.
YorgasonJ. B.GustafsonK. B. (2014). Linking grandparent involvement with the development of prosocial behavior in adolescents. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 201–217). Oxford University Press.
75.
YounissJ. (1980). Parents and peers in social development: A Sullivan–Piaget perspective. University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
