Social integration is known to be positively related to academic performance. It is also well-known to play a different role for (self-identified) men and women. In this paper, we examine the differences seen in the correlations between academic performance and social integration for men and women. Gender was determined on the basis of self-identification. Utilizing the data from the Russian representative panel of late adolescents (N = 4,400), we demonstrate a positive relationship between the core discussion network size as a measure of social integration. Using moderation analysis, we demonstrate that the role of social integration for women is more pronounced than for men. Our findings show the importance of social integration and support for girls and women and suggest possible policy implications.
AlbertF.KoltaiJ.DavidB. (2021). The increasing importance of friends: Changes in core discussion network composition in post-communist Hungary between 1997–2015. Social Networks, 66, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.02.005
2.
BakkerS. R.HendriksP. H. J.KorziliusH. P. L. M. (2022). Let it go or let it grow? Personal network development and the mobilization of intra-organizational social capital. Social Networks, 68, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.06.002
BlommaertL.MeulemanR.LeenheerS.ButkēvičaA. (2020). The gender gap in job authority: Do social network resources matter?Acta Sociologica, 63(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699319847504
5.
BurtR. S.MarsdenP. V.RossiP. H. (1985). A research agenda for survey network data. Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University.
6.
CasadB. J.FranksJ. E.GaraskyC. E.KittlemanM. M.RoeslerA. C.HallD. Y.PetzelZ. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631
7.
ChidambaramV.ShanmugamK.ParayitamS. (2023). Parental neglect and emotional wellbeing among adolescent students from India: Social network addiction as a mediator and gender as a moderator. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(7), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2046164
8.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
9.
DillB. T.ZambranaR. E. (2020). Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens Feminist theory reader (pp. 108–116). Routledge.
10.
DokukaS.ValeevaD.YudkevichM. (2020). How academic achievement spreads: The role of distinct social networks in academic performance diffusion. PLoS One, 15(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236737
Fox TreeJ. E.VaidJ. (2022). Why so few, still? Challenges to attracting, advancing, and keeping women faculty of color in academia. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 792198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.792198
13.
FroehlichL.OlssonM. I.DorroughA. R.MartinyS. E. (2020). Gender at work across nations: Men and women working in male‐dominated and female‐dominated occupations are differentially associated with agency and communion. Journal of Social Issues, 76(3), 484–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12390
14.
GeorgiadouA.SyedJ. (2021). The interaction between gender and informal social networks: An East Asian perspective: Gender diversity management in East Asia. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(4), 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12347
15.
GundersonE. A.RamirezG.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
16.
IgarashiT.TakaiJ.YoshidaT. (2005). Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056492
17.
JacksonM.KhavensonT.ChirkinaT. (2020). Raising the stakes: Inequality and testing in the Russian education system. Social Forces, 98(4), 1613–1635. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz152
18.
KimJ. W.LimC.FalciC. (2020). Subjective social class, perceived quality of social relationships, and happiness: A case of mediation and moderation across gender. International Sociology, 35(3), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920906375
MarsdenP. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095397
21.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301
22.
MishraS. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students. Educational Research Review, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307
23.
MushtaqI.KhanS. N. (2012). Factors affecting students academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 1–7.
24.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem-solving, and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.
25.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, reading, and science. OECD Publishing.
26.
PalchykovV.KaskiK.KertészJ.BarabásiA. L.DunbarR. I. (2012). Sex differences in intimate relationships. Scientific Reports, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00370
27.
PasqueP. A.NicholsonS. E. (Eds), (2023). Empowering women in higher education and student affairs: Theory, research, narratives, and practice from feminist perspectives. Taylor & Francis.
28.
PrakhovI.YudkevichM. (2019). University admission in Russia: Do the wealthier benefit from standardized exams?International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.007
29.
RothP. L.ClarkeR. L. (1998). Meta-analyzing the relation between grades and salary. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1621
StadtfeldC.VörösA.ElmerT.BodaZ.RaabeI. J. (2019). Integration in emerging social networks explains academic failure and success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(3), 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811388115
32.
SzellM.ThurnerS. (2013). How women organize social networks different from men. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01214
33.
ThieleL.SauerN. C.KauffeldS. (2018). Why extraversion is not enough: The mediating role of initial peer network centrality linking personality to long-term academic performance. Higher Education, 76(5), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0242-5
34.
Van EmmerikI. H. (2006). Gender differences in the creation of different types of social capital: A multilevel study. Social Networks, 28(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.002
35.
VaqueroL. M.CebrianM. (2013). The rich club phenomenon in the classroom. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01174
36.
VargasD. L.BridgemanA. M.SchmidtD. R.KohlP. B.WilcoxB. R.CarrL. D. (2018). Correlation between student collaboration network centrality and academic performance. Physical Review of Physics Education Research, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020112
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
