Cardiac disease induced post-traumatic stress symptoms (CDI-PTSS) have been associated with negative consequences for patients’ mental and physical health. Identifying risk factors as well as potential buffers is necessary for understanding the development and maintenance of CDI-PTSS. The current study focused on the mediating and moderating role played by patients’ perceptions of their partners’ ways of providing support (active engagement, overprotection, and protective buffering) in the development and stabilization of CDI-PTSS levels over time.
Method
Male patients (N = 106) were recruited at hospitalization (T1) and completed the study’s questionnaires at two time points: approximately four months after hospital discharge (T2) and approximately eight months after discharge (T3).
Results
Structual equation modeling was used to test the study hypotheses. All three forms of T2 perceived partner support were positively associated with T2 CDI-PTSS levels which, in turn, were positively associated with T3 CDI-PTSS levels. The linear association between T2 and T3 CDI-PTSS was positive but decreased as perceived partner protective buffering levels increased.
Conclusions
In the context of CDI-PTSS, perceived partner support seems to have a different effect than it has in non-traumatic illness contexts. Interventions for couples coping with CDI-PTSS should be designed accordingly.
AgarwalS.PresciuttiA.CorneliusT.BirkJ.RohD. J.ParkS.EdmondsonD. (2019). Cardiac arrest and the subsequent hospitalization induced posttraumatic stress is associated with 1-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Critical Care Medicine, 47(6), 502–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003713
2.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor Analysis for applied research (2nd Edition). The Guilford Press.
4.
BryantR. A. (2019). Post‐traumatic stress disorder: A state‐of‐the‐art review of evidence and challenges. World Psychiatry, 18(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20656
5.
Butner-KozimorL. M.SavlaJ. (2020). Couples facing skin cancer in old age: A dyadic investigation of partner support and quality of life. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(2), 746–766.
6.
BuunkB. P.BerkhuysenM. A.SandermanR.NieuwlandW.RanchorA. V. (1996). Actieve betrokkenheid, beschermend bufferen en overbescherming: Meetinstrument voor de rol van de partner bij hartrevalidatie. Gedrag en Gezondheid, 24(1), 304–313. [The role of the partner in heart disease: Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection].
7.
CarlsonH. N.WeinerJ. L. (2020). The neural, behavioral, and epidemiological underpinnings of comorbid alcohol use disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. International Review of Neurobiology, 157(1), 69–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2020.09.006
8.
ChenE.LamP. H.FinegoodE. D.TurianoN. A.MroczekD. K.MillerG. E. (2021). The balance of giving versus receiving social support and all-cause mortality in a US national sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(24), 1. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024770118
9.
CoyneJ. C.SmithD. A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives' distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.404
10.
CoyneJ. C.SmithD. A. F. (1994). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.8.1.43
11.
DekelR.SiegelA.FridkinS.SvetlitzkyV. (2018). Does it help? The contribution of wives' ways of giving support to their veteran husbands’ posttraumatic stress symptoms and functional impairment. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 31(6), 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22343
12.
EdmondsonD.RichardsonS.FalzonL.DavidsonK. W.MillsM. A.NeriaY. (2012). Posttraumatic stress disorder prevalence and risk of recurrence in acute coronary syndrome patients: A meta-analytic review. Plos One, 7(6), e38915–e38915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038915
13.
EllisPaul D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes. : Cambridge University Press.
14.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
15.
FalconierM. K.JacksonJ. B.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
16.
FoaE. B.McLeanC. P.ZangY.ZhongJ.PowersM. B.KauffmanB. Y.KnowlesK. (2016). Psychometric properties of the posttraumatic diagnostic scale for DSM–5 (PDS–5). Psychological Assessment, 28, 1166–1171. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0000258
17.
George-LeviS.PelegS.VilchinskyN.RafaeliE.KhaskiaaA.MosseriM.HodH. (2020). Attachment insecurity hinders cardiac patients’ ability to receive partners’ care: A longitudinal dyadic study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(5), 1494–1512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519900998
18.
George-LeviS.VilchinskyN.TolmaczR.KhaskiaaA.MosseriM.HodH. (2016). It takes two to take”: Caregiving style, relational entitlement, and medication adherence. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(6), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000203
19.
HagedoornM.DaganM.PutermanE.HoffC.MeijerinkW. J.DeLongisA.SandermanR. (2011). Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: The interplay of past and current spousal support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34(4), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9311-7
20.
HansfordM.JobsonL. (2021). Sociocultural context and the posttraumatic psychological response: Considering culture, social support, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001009
21.
HatchR.YoungD.BarberV.GriffithsJ.HarrisonD. A.WatkinsonP. (2018). Anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after critical illness: A UK-wide prospective cohort study. Critical Care, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2223-6
22.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2013). Conditional process modeling: Using structural equation modeling to examine contingent causal processes. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 219–266). IAP Information Age Publishing..
23.
Jacquet‐SmailovicM.TarquinioC.AllaF.DenisI.KircheA.TarquinioC.BrennstuhlM. J. (2021). Posttraumatic stress disorder following myocardial infarction: A systematic review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(1), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22591
24.
KearnsN. T.ContractorA. A.WeissN. H.BlumenthalH. (2021). Coping strategy utilization among posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity and substance use co-occurrence typologies: A latent class analysis. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 13(8), 929–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000964
25.
KroemekeA.Sobczyk-KruszelnickaM. (2019). Protective buffering and individual and relational adjustment following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A dyadic daily-diary study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 2195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02195
26.
KuijerR. G.YbemaJ. F.BuunkB. P.De JongG. M.Thijs-BoerF.SandermanR. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.2.256
27.
LittleR. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(1), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
28.
Niemann-MirmehdiM.HäuslerA.GellertP.NordheimJ. (2019). Perceived overprotection and its association with quality of life in dementia. GeroPsych, 32(3), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000207
29.
NurullahA. S. (2012). Received and provided social support: A review of current evidence and future directions. American Journal of Health Studies, 27(3), 173–188. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2158458
30.
O'BertosS. E.HolmbergD.ShieldsC. A.MathesonL. P. (2020). Partners’ attachment styles and overprotective support as predictors of patient outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000331
31.
PerndorferC.SorianoE. C.SiegelS. D.LaurenceauJ. P. (2019). Everyday protective buffering predicts intimacy and fear of cancer recurrence in couples coping with early‐stage breast cancer. Psycho-oncology, 28(2), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4942
32.
PlamannK.McCarthy VeachP.LeRoyB. S.MacFarlaneI. M.PetzelS. V.ZierhutH. A. (2021). Effects of monitoring versus blunting on the public’s preferences for information in a hypothetical cancer diagnosis scenario. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 30(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1302
33.
RapelliGDonatoSPaganiAFPariseMIafrateRPietrabissaGGiustiEMCastelnuovoGBertoniA (2021). The association between cardiac illness-related distress and partner support: The moderating role of dyadic coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 624095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624095
SimonN.RobertsN. P.LewisC. E.van GelderenM. J.BissonJ. I. (2019). Associations between perceived social support, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD): Implications for treatment. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1573129
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
38.
TsaoC. W.AdayA. W.AlmarzooqZ. I.AlonsoA.BeatonA. Z.BittencourtM. S.American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee (2022). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: A report from the American heart association. Circulation, 145(8), e153–e639. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052
39.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
40.
UchinoB. N.BowenK.de GreyR. K.MikelJ.FisherE. B. (2018). Social support and physical health: Models, mechanisms, and opportunities. In Principles and concepts of behavioral medicine (pp. 341–372). Springer.
41.
VilchinskyN. (2021). Cardiac‐disease‐induced‐PTSD: Settling the diagnostic debate. In GrafP.DozoisD. J. A. (Eds.), Handbook on the state of the art in applied psychology (pp. 197–206). Wiley Blackwell.
42.
VilchinskyN.DekelR. (2018). Cardiac disease-induced PTSD: The need for a dyadic perspective. In BertoniA.DonatoS.MolgoraS. (Eds.), Psychology research progress. When "we" are stressed: A dyadic approach to coping with stressful events (pp. 109-124). Nova Science Publishe.
43.
VilchinskyN.DekelR.LeibowitzM.RegesO.KhaskiaA.MosseriM. (2011). Dynamics of support perceptions among couples coping with cardiac illness: The effect on recovery outcomes. Health Psychology, 30(4), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023453
44.
VilchinskyN.GinzburgK.FaitK.FoaE. B. (2017). Cardiac-disease-induced PTSD (CDI-PTSD): A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 55(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.009
45.
WiesmaierovaS.PetrovaD.Arrebola MorenoA. (2019). Social support buffers the negative effects of stress in cardiac patients: A cross-sectional study with acute coronary syndrome patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 42(1), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9998-4
ZnivaR.PauliP.SchulzS. M. (2017). Overprotective social support leads to increased cardiovascular and subjective stress reactivity. Biological Psychology, 123, 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.12.009
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
