Emotional facial expressions are relevant to flirtation because they provide information on an individual’s intentions or motivations. Individual differences in the ability to accurately detect and discriminate between normative facially expressed emotions could lead to misperceptions of the level of sexual interest being conveyed, which has been linked to sexual assault and harassment. To explore this notion, we recruited a national sample of college aged male and female participants (N = 219) who completed a novel facial expression recognition task used to detect accuracy in processing facial emotions of happiness, surprise, anger, and disgust. Participants also viewed multiple video clips of blind dates between two different-sex participants and rated each partner on their degree of flirtatiousness. Consistent with predictions, we found that individuals who misidentified other facial emotions for happiness appeared to overestimate flirtation. Though not predicted, participants who failed to accurately identify happy faces also overestimated flirtation, whereas individuals who took longer to respond to emotional facial expressions and misidentified an emotion as conveying happiness made greater errors in perceptions of flirtatiousness. Overall, these findings suggest that individual differences in the ability to detect and discriminate happiness through facial expressions are relevant to misperceptions of flirtatious behavior, and more broadly illuminates the role of basic emotion recognition on perceptions of flirtatiousness.
AbbeyA. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.830
2.
AbbeyA.HarnishR. J. (1995). Perception of sexual intent: The role of gender, alcohol consumption, and rape supportive attitudes. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 32(5–6), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544599
3.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.WebbS. A. (2008). Decoding deficits of different types of batterers during presentation of facial affect slides. Journal of Family Violence, 23(5), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9151-1
4.
BarrettL. F. (2011). Was Darwin wrong about emotional expressions?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429125
5.
BarrettL. F.AdolphsR.MarsellaS.MartinezA. M.PollakS. D. (2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930
6.
BaumeisterR. F.CataneseK. R.VohsK. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5
7.
BendaM. S.ScherfK. S. (2020). The complex emotion expression database: A validated stimulus set of trained actors. PLOS ONE, 15(2), Article e0228248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228248
8.
BrownL. A.CohenA. S. (2010). Facial emotion recognition in schizotypy: The role of accuracy and social cognitive bias. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 16(3), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1017/s135561771000007x
9.
CahoonD. D.EdmondsE. M. (1989). Male-female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females’ clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(3), 280–281. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334607
10.
CalvoM.EstevesF. (2005). Detection of emotional faces: Low perceptual threshold and wide attentional span. Visual Cognition, 12(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000094
11.
CareyK. B.NorrisA. L.DurneyS. E.ShepardsonR. L.CareyM. P. (2018). Mental health consequences of sexual assault among first-year college women. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431915
12.
ChealJ. L.RutherfordM. D. (2013). Context-dependent categorical perception of surprise. Perception, 42(3), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7130
13.
ChenC.GarrodO.SchynsP.JackR. (2015). The face is the mirror of the cultural mind. Journal of Vision, 15(12), 928–928. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.928
14.
CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology press.
15.
ConnollyH. L.LefevreC. E.YoungA. W.LewisG. J. (2020). Emotion recognition ability: Evidence for a supramodal factor and its links to social cognition. Cognition, 197(1), Article 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104166
16.
CorcoranK. J. (1996). The influence of gender, expectancy, and partner beverage selection on (meta)perceptions in a "blind" dating situation. Addictive Behaviors, 21(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(95)00061-5
17.
CordaroD. T.SunR.KeltnerD.KambleS.HuddarN.McNeilG. (2018). Universals and cultural variations in 22 emotional expressions across five cultures. Emotion, 18(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000302
DuS.TaoY.MartinezA. M. (2014). Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(15), E1454–E1462. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322355111
20.
DuttonD. G.AronA. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037031
21.
EkmanP. (1999). Basic emotions. In DalgleishT.PowerM.J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). John Wiley & Sons.
22.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030377
23.
FarrisC.TreatT. A.VikenR. J.McFallR. M. (2008). Perceptual mechanisms that characterize gender differences in decoding women's sexual intent. Psychological Science, 19(4), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02092.x
24.
FarrisC.VikenR. J.TreatT. A. (2010). Perceived association between diagnostic and non-diagnostic cues of women's sexual interest: General Recognition Theory predictors of risk for sexual coercion. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.10.001
25.
FarrisC.VikenR. J.TreatT. A.McFallR. M. (2006). Heterosocial perceptual organization: Application of the choice model to sexual coercion. Psychological Science, 17(10), 869–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01796.x
26.
FedinaL.HolmesJ. L.BackesB. L. (2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129
27.
Forni-SantosL.OsórioF. L. (2015). Influence of gender in the recognition of basic facial expressions: A critical literature review. World J Psychiatry, 5(3), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.342
GersickA.KurzbanR. (2014). Covert sexual signaling: Human flirtation and implications for other social species. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200305
30.
GillespieS. M.RotshteinP.SatherleyR.-M.BeechA. R.MitchellI. J. (2015). Emotional expression recognition and attribution bias among sexual and violent offenders: A signal detection analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 595–595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00595
31.
Haj-MohamadiP.GillathO.RosenbergE. L. (2021). Identifying a facial expression of flirtation and its effect on men. Journal of Sex Research, 58(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1805583
32.
HallJ. A.XingC.BrooksS. (2014). Accurately detecting flirting: Error management theory, the traditional sexual script, and flirting base rate. Communication Research, 42(7), 939–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534972
33.
HarnishR. J.AbbeyA.DeBonoK. G. (1990). Toward an understanding of “the sex game”: The effects of gender and self‐monitoring on perceptions of sexuality and likability in initial interactions 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(16), 1333–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01475.x
34.
HaseltonM. G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00529-9
35.
HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81
36.
HenningsenD. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 50(7-8), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023068.49352.4b
37.
HerrmannE.CallJ.Hernández-LloredaV.HareB.TomaselloM. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science (New York, N.Y.), 317(5843), 1360–1366. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146282
38.
HowellE. C.EtchellsP. J.Penton-VoakI. S. (2012). The sexual overperception bias is associated with sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.024
39.
JackR. E.CrivelliC.WheatleyT. (2018). Data-driven methods to diversify knowledge of human psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.002
40.
KoenigB. L.KirkpatrickL. A.KetelaarT. (2007). Misperception of sexual and romantic interests in opposite-sex friendships: Four hypotheses. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00163.x
41.
KosonogovV.TitovaA. (2019). Recognition of all basic emotions varies in accuracy and reaction time: A new verbal method of measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 54(5), 582–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12512
42.
KoukounasE.LetchN. M. (2001). Psychological correlates of perception of sexual intent in women. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600564
43.
KrumhuberE.MansteadA.KappasA. (2007). Temporal aspects of facial displays in person and expression perception: The effects of smile dynamics, head-tilt, and gender. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-006-0019-x
44.
La FranceB. H.HenningsenD. D.OatesA.ShawC. M. (2009). Social-sexual interactions? Meta-analyses of sex differences in perceptions of flirtatiousness, seductiveness, and promiscuousness. Communication Monographs, 76(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903074701
45.
LeeA. J.SidariM. J.MurphyS. C.SherlockJ. M.ZietschB. P. (2020). Sex differences in misperceptions of sexual interest can Be explained by sociosexual orientation and men projecting their own interest onto women. Psychological Science, 31(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619900315
46.
LentonA. P.BryanA. (2005). An affair to remember: The role of sexual scripts in perceptions of sexual intent. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00127.x
47.
LeppänenJ. M.HietanenJ. K. (2004). Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why?Psychological Research, 69(1-2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0157-2
48.
LevensonM.KiehlK.FitzpatrickC. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.151
49.
LevineT. R.KimR. K.Sun ParkH.HughesM. (2006). Deception detection accuracy is a predictable linear function of message veracity base-rate: A formal test of park and levine’s probability model. Communication Monographs, 73(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750600873736
50.
MalamuthN. M.SockloskieR. J.KossM. P.TanakaJ. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 670–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.670
51.
MatsumotoD.KeltnerD.ShiotaM. N.O'SullivanM.FrankM. (2008). Facial expressions of emotion. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 211–234). The Guilford Press.
52.
MattsonR. E.ParkerM. M.McKinnonA. M.MasseyS. G.MerriwetherA. M.HardestyM.YoungS. R. (2022). Just say yes? A cluster analytic approach to evaluating college students’ understandings of affirmative consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(5–6), 3197–3209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02217-z
53.
MayerJ. D.SaloveyP.CarusoD. R.SitareniosG. (2001). Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence. Emotion, 1(3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.232
MontepareJ.DobishH. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(4), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332800296
56.
MooreM. M. (2010). Human nonverbal courtship behavior--a brief historical review. Journal of Sex Research, 47(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903402520
57.
MuehlenhardC. L.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N.PetersonZ. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
58.
NewstromN. P.HarrisS. M.MinerM. H. (2021). Sexual consent: How relationships, gender, and sexual self-disclosure affect signaling and interpreting cues for sexual consent in a hypothetical heterosexual sexual situation. Sex Roles, 84(7), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01178-2
RanganathR.JurafskyD.McFarlandD. A. (2009, August). It’s not you, it’s me: Detecting flirting and its misperception in speed-dates. In Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 334–342). Suntec City.
61.
RickelJ.MarsellaS.GratchJ.HillR.TraumD.SwartoutW. (2002). Toward a new generation of virtual humans for interactive experiences. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2002.1024750
62.
RozinP.CohenA. B. (2003). High frequency of facial expressions corresponding to confusion, concentration, and worry in an analysis of naturally occurring facial expressions of Americans. Emotion, 3(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.68
SchmidtK. L.CohnJ. F. (2001). Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression research. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 116(S33), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20001
65.
SinozichS.LangtonL. (2014). Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995-2013. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
66.
SmithS. G.ZhangX.BasileK. C.MerrickM. T.WangJ.KresnowM.ChenJ. (2018). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2015 data brief – updated release. CDC.
67.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1973). A short version of the attitudes toward women scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2(4), 219–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329252
68.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704
69.
TomichP. L.SchusterP. M. (1996). Gender differences in the perception of sexuality: Methodological considerations. Sex Roles, 34(11), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544320
70.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A.MarcusD. J.WesterlundA.CaseyB. J.NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
71.
TreatT. A.ChurchE. K.VikenR. J. (2017). Effects of gender, rape-supportive attitudes, and explicit instruction on perceptions of women’s momentary sexual interest. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 979–986. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1176-5
72.
TreatT. A.McFallR. M.VikenR. J.KruschkeJ. K. (2001). Using cognitive science methods to assess the role of social information processing in sexually coercive behavior. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.549
73.
TreatT. A.McMurrayB.BettyJ. R.VikenR. J. (2019). Tracking men’s perceptions of women’s sexual interest. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419884322
74.
UljarevicM.HamiltonA. (2013). Recognition of emotions in autism: A formal meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord, 43(7), 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1695-5
75.
VanhalstJ.GibbB. E.PrinsteinM. J. (2017). Lonely adolescents exhibit heightened sensitivity for facial cues of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 31(2), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1092420
76.
WellsL. J.GillespieS. M.RotshteinP. (2016). Identification of emotional facial expressions: Effects of expression, intensity, and sex on eye gaze. Plos One, 11(12), Article e0168307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168307
77.
WilsonT. D.LisleD. J.SchoolerJ. W.HodgesS. D.KlaarenK. J.LaFleurS. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(3), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293193010
78.
WilsonT. D.SchoolerJ. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181
79.
ZsidoA. N.AratoN.IhaszV.BaslerJ.Matuz-BudaiT.InhofO.SchachtA.LabadiB.CoelhoC. M. (2021). “finding an emotional face” revisited: Differences in own-age bias and the happiness superiority effect in children and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 580565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.580565.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
