Reconsider the triangle: Effects of birth parents’ communicative practices on Chinese hidden children’s identification with family of origin

Abstract

Employing the theoretical approach of discourse dependence, the present study investigates the effects of birth parents’ communicative practices upon Chinese hidden children’s identification with family of origin before and after family reunification. Semi-structured interviews with 10 hidden children presented a birth parent-centered triangle of communication among birth parents, hidden children, and foster caregivers. The birth parents’ open communication with hidden children and foster caregivers, display of affections, along with the representation of family membership, affected hidden children’s birth family identification. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Family identity discourse-dependent families hidden children China one-child policy family reunification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold

L. B.

(2008). Family communication: Theory and research. Pearson Education.

Baer

(2020). Experiences of divorced women using an online education modality to seek self-identity and empowerment. [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing (Publication No. 28095632).

Balsells

M. À.

Pastor

Molina

M. C.

Fuentes-Pelaez

Vázquez

(2017). Understanding social support in reunification: The views of foster children, birth families and social workers. British Journal of Social Work, 47(3), 812–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw049

Barriball

While

(1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x

Baxter

L. A

(2014). Remaking "family" communicatively. Peter Lang.

Berrick

J. D.

Skivenes

(2013). Fostering in the welfare states of the U.S. and Norway. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0958928713507469

Boyle

(2017). “What is the impact of birth family contact on children in adoption and long-term foster care?” A systematic review. Child and Family Social Work, 22(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12236

Braithwaite

D. O.

Bach

B. W.

Baxter

L. A.

DiVerniero

Hammonds

J. R.

Hosek

A. M.

Willer

E. K.

Wolf

B. M.

(2010). Constructing family: A typology of voluntary kin. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407510361615

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

10.

Caughlin

J. P.

Afifi

T. D.

(2004). When is topic avoidance unsatisfying? Examining moderators of the association between avoidance and dissatisfaction. Human Communication Research, 30(4), 479–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00742.x

11.

Chang

C. F.

Chen

Z. J.

Chatham-Carpenter

(2016). Constructing and negotiating identity in “birth culture”: An intercultural communication approach. China Media Research, 12(1), 3–13.

12.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

13.

Colaner

C. W.

Halliwell

Guignon

(2014). “What do you say to your mother when your mother's standing beside you?” Birth and adoptive family contributions to adoptive identity via relational identity and relational–relational identity gaps. Communication Monographs, 81(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.955808

14.

Colaner

C. W.

Horstman

H. K.

Rittenour

C. E.

(2018). Negotiating adoptive and birth shared family identity: A social identity complexity approach. Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1384564

15.

Docan-Morgan

(2017). Korean adoptees’ discursive construction of birth family and adoptive family identity through names and labels. Communication Quarterly, 65(5), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1299192

16.

Edström

(2018). Visibility patterns of gendered ageism in the media buzz: A study of the representation of gender and age over three decades. Feminist Media Studies, 18(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1409989

17.

Floud

(1982). The adoption triangle. Adoption & Fostering, 6(4), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030857598200600411

18.

Galvin

K. M.

(2006a). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In Turner

L. H.

West

(Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–19). Sage.

19.

Galvin

K. M.

(2006b). Joined by hearts and words: Adoptive family relationships. In Floyd

Morman

M. T.

(Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 137–152). Sage.

20.

Galvin

K. M.

Braithwaite

D. O.

(2014). Theory and research from the communication field: Discourses that constitute and reflect families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12030

21.

Galvin

K. M.

Colaner

(2014). Created through law and language: Communicative complexities of adoptive families. In Floyd

K. W.

Morman

M. T.

(Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 191–210). Sage.

22.

Gietel-Basten

Han

X. H.

Cheng

(2019). Assessing the impact of the “one-child policy” in China: A synthetic control approach. PLoS ONE, 14(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220170

23.

Hays

A. H.

Horstman

H. K.

Colaner

C. W.

Nelson

L. R.

(2015). ‘‘She chose us to be your parents’’: Exploring the content and process of adoption entrance narratives told in families formed through open adoption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(7), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515611494

24.

D. Y.-F.

(1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(3), 349–365.

25.

Horstman

H. K.

Colaner

C. W.

Nelson

L. R.

Bish

Hays

(2018). Communicatively constructing birth family relationships in open adoptive families: Naming, connecting, and relational functioning. Journal of Family Communication, 18(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1429444

26.

Huang

Lei

Zhao

(2016). One-child policy and the rise of man-made twins. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00567

27.

Jarvis

J. A.

Gibby

A. L.

Dufur

M. J.

Pribesh

(2020). Family structure and child well-being in a non-western context: The role of parent–child relations and parental conflict in South Korea. Population Research and Policy Review, 39(3), 439–464. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09586-8

28.

Jen

C.-H.

Chen

W.-W.

C.-W.

(2019). Flexible mindset in the family: Filial piety, cognitive flexibility, and general mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 36(6), 1715–1730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518770912

29.

Jin

(2012). A review of studies on hidden children in the rural areas. Forum on Contemporary Education, (3), 118–122.

30.

Johnson

K. A

(2004). Wanting a daughter, needing a son: Abandonment, adoption, and orphanage care in China. Yeong and Yeong Book Company.

31.

Johnson

K. A

(2016). China’s hidden children: Abandonment, adoption, and the human costs of the one-child policy. University of Chicago Press.

32.

Kellas

J. K.

Suter

E. A.

(2012). Accounting for lesbian-headed families: Lesbian mothers’ responses to discursive challenges. Communication Monographs, 79(4), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.723812

33.

Kinniburgh-White

Cartwright

Seymour

(2010). Young adults’ narratives of relational development with stepfathers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(7), 890–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510376252

34.

Kranstuber

Kellas

J. K.

(2011). “Instead of growing under her heart, I grew in it”: The relationship between adoptee entrance narratives and adoptees’ self-concept. Communication Quarterly, 59(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.563440

35.

LaBrenz

C. A.

Fong

Cubbin

(2020). The road to reunification: Family-and state system-factors associated with successful reunification for children ages zero-to-five. Child Abuse & Neglect, 99(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104252

36.

(2018). Maintaining ties and reaffirming unity: Family rituals in the age of migration. Journal of Family Communication, 18(4), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1475391

37.

López

del Valle

J. F.

Montserral

Bravo

(2013). Factors associated with family reunification for children in foster care. Child & Family Social Work, 18(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00847.x

38.

Luecken

L. J.

Appelhans

B. M.

Kraft

Brown

(2006). A cognitive-affective model of the impact of early-life family relationships on physiological stress responses in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506062466

39.

X. Y.

Zhou

Gao

Jin

(2020). Family-to-family child migration network of informal adoption in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00542-7

40.

McElroy

Yang

D. T.

(2000). Carrots and sticks: Fertility effects of China’s population policies. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.389

41.

McInroy

L. B.

Craig

S. L.

(2015). Transgender representation in offline and online media: LGBTQ youth perspectives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(6), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.995392

42.

Miller-Ott

A. E.

(2017). Developing and maintaining foster family identity through foster parents’ identity work. Journal of Family Communication, 17(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1293061

43.

Nelson

L. R.

Colaner

C. W.

(2018). Becoming a transracial family: communicatively negotiating divergent identities in families formed through transracial adoption. Journal of Family Communication, 18(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1396987

44.

Nelson

L. R.

Horstman

H. K.

(2017). Communicated meaning-making in foster families: Relationships between foster parents’ entrance narratives and foster child well-being. Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1396987

45.

Scharp

K. M.

Thomas

L. J.

(2018). Making meaning of the parent–child relationship: A dialogic analysis of parent-initiated estrangement narratives. Journal of Family Communication, 18(4), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1484747

46.

Senese

V. P.

Miranda

M. C.

Lansford

J. E.

Bacchini

Nasti

Rohner

R. P.

(2020). Psychological maladjustment mediates the relation between recollections of parental rejection in childhood and adults’ fear of intimacy in Italy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(5), 636–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520912339

47.

Shek

D. T. L.

(2006). Chinese family research: Puzzles, progress, paradigms, and policy implications. Journal of Family Issues, 27(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05283508

48.

Smith

A. B.

Taylor

N. J.

(2003). Rethinking children’s involvement in decision-making after parental separation. In. Paper presented at the Eighth Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference. Steps forward for families: Research, practice and policy, Mebourne.

49.

Stamp

G. H.

(2004). Theories of family relationships and a family relationships theoretical model. In Vangelisti

A. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 1–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.

50.

Stark

(2003). Baby girls from China in New York: A thrice-told tale. Utah Law Review, (4), 1231–1301. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2123696

51.

Suter

(2009). Validity in qualitative research on personal relationships. The Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(2), 77–96.

52.

Suter

E. A.

Baxter

L. A.

Seurer

L. M.

Thomas

L. J.

(2014). Discursive constructions of the meaning of “family” in online narratives of foster adoptive parents. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 59–78. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.880791

53.

Suter

E. A.

Reyes

K. L.

Ballard

R. L.

(2010). Parental management of adoptive identities during challenging encounters: Adoptive parents as ‘protectors’ and ‘educators’. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510384419

54.

Thomas

L. J.

(2014). “Once a foster child ...”: Identity construction in former foster children’s narratives. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 15(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2014.955596

55.

Thomas

L. J.

Jackl

J. A.

Crowley

J. L.

(2017). “Family? ... not just blood”: Discursive constructions of “family” in adult, former foster children's narratives. Journal of Family Communication, 17(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1310728

56.

Togari

Sato

Otemori

Yonekura

Yokoyama

Kimura

Tanaka

Yamazaki

(2011). Sense of coherence in mothers and children, family relationships and participation in decision-making at home: An analysis based on Japanese parent–child pair data. Health Promotion International, 27(2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daq081

57.

Turner

L. H.

West

(2018). Invited essay: Investigating family voices from the margins. Journal of Family Communication, 18(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1435548

58.

Wang

J. H.

(2017). Girls sent away by birth parents. Boyangcong People. https://www.sohu.com/a/192212848_375839

59.

Bright

C. L.

Ahn

(2018). Responding to child maltreatment: Comparison between the USA and China. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12287

60.

Yan

Y. X

(2016). Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy, and family change in a Chinese village, 1949-1999 (Gong, X. X., Trans). Shanghai People’s Publishing House (Reprinted from Private life under socialism: Love, intimacy, and family change in a Chinese village, 1949–1999, by Yan, Y. X., 2003, Stanford University Press).

61.

Yoo

J. U.

(2020). Relationships between Korean parents’ marital satisfaction, parental satisfaction, and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(7), 2270–2285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520921462

62.

Zeng

F. L

(2002). The basis of foster care policy for disabled and orphaned children. China’s Social Welfare, (7), 28–29.