There is limited research on dating stress, or stressful experiences related to the dating process (e.g., inconsistent communication, sudden lack of response, and rude behavior). Little attention has been given to classifying stressors involved with the pursuit of potential partners from initial contact to relationship formation. In the current study, we developed a novel measure for such experiences, the Inventory of Dating Stress (IDS). We investigated the factor structure and preliminary construct validity for the IDS in an online sample of adults (n = 478). Results revealed a reliable four-factor structure (Mixed Signals, Mismatch, Ambiguous Rejection, and Harassment) across 18 items and the IDS demonstrated initial construct validity. Overall, the current study offers evidence of preliminary psychometric support for the IDS as a measure of dating stress.
AndrighettoL.RivaP.GabbiadiniA. (2019). Lonely hearts and angry minds: Online dating rejection increases male (but not female) hostility. Aggressive Behavior, 45(5), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21852
2.
BanduraA. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3.
BankerJ. E.KaestleC. E.AllenK. R. (2010). Dating is hard work: A narrative approach to understanding sexual and romantic relationships in young adulthood. Contemporary Family Therapy, 32(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9111-9
BirnbaumG. E.Kanat-MaymonY.MizrahiM.BarnivA.NagarS.GovindenJ.ReisH. T. (2018). Are you into me? Uncertainty and sexual desire in online encounters and established relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 372-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.023.
6.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212441028
7.
BirnbaumG. E.ZholtackK.ReisH. T. (2020). No pain, no gain: Perceived partner mate value mediates the desire-inducing effect of being hard to get during online and face-to-face encounters. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(8–9), 2510–2528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520927469
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
10.
BühlerJ. L.KraussS.OrthU. (2021). Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000342
11.
Center for Collegiate Mental Health. (2019). 2018 Annual report (Publication No. STA 19-180).
12.
ChorneyD. B.MorrisT. L. (2008). The changing face of dating anxiety: Issues in assessment with special populations. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00132.x
13.
ClarkM. S.BeckL. A. (2011). Initiating and evaluating close relationships: A task central to emerging adults. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. (pp. 190–212). Cambridge University Press.
DavilaJ.ZhouJ.NoronaJ.BhatiaV.MizeL.LashmanK. (2021). Teaching romantic competence skills to emerging adults: A relationship education workshop. Personal Relationships, 28(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12366
16.
DescutnerC. J.ThelenM. H. (1991). Development and validation of a Fear-of-Intimacy Scale. Psychological Assessment, 3(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.218
17.
EinsteinD. A. (2014). Extension of the transdiagnostic model to focus on intolerance of uncertainty: A review of the literature and implications for treatment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21(3), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12077
18.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.KarneyB. R.ReisH. T.SprecherS. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
19.
FreedmanG.PowellD. N.LeB.WilliamsK. D. (2019). Ghosting and destiny: Implicit theories of relationships predict beliefs about ghosting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517748791
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
22.
James-KangalN.WhittonS. W. (2019). Conflict management in emerging adults’ “nonrelationships.” Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 8(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000118
23.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P. (2013). Playing hard-to-get: Manipulating one’s perceived availability as a mate. European Journal of Personality, 27(5), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1881
24.
JöreskogK. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343
25.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
26.
LeFebvreL. E.AllenM.RasnerR. D.GarstadS.WilmsA.ParrishC. (2019). Ghosting in emerging adults’ romantic relationships: The digital dissolution disappearance strategy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618820519
27.
LeFebvreL. E.FanX. (2020). Ghosted?: Navigating strategies for reducing uncertainty and implications surrounding ambiguous loss. Personal Relationships, 27(2), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12322
ManiaciM. R.RoggeR. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008.
30.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
33.
RosenfeldM. J.ThomasR. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050
34.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
35.
SlavichG. M.O’DonovanA.EpelE. S.KemenyM. E. (2010). Black sheep get the blues: A psychobiological model of social rejection and depression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.003
36.
SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B. W.LöweB. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
37.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.FinchamF. D. (2011). Understanding romantic relationships among emerging adults: The significant roles of cohabitation and ambiguity. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. (pp. 234–251). Cambridge University Press.
38.
TaylorA. C.RappleyeaD. L.FangX.CannonD. (2013). Emerging adults’ perceptions of acceptable behaviors prior to forming a committed, dating relationship. Journal of Adult Development, 20(4), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9169-3
39.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291170
40.
VennumA.FinchamF. D. (2011). Assessing decision making in young adult romantic relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023287
41.
VeroffJ.KulkaR. A.DouvanE. A. M. (1981). Mental health in America: Patterns of help-seeking from 1957-1976. Basic Books.
42.
WhismanM. A.BaucomD. H. (2012). Intimate relationships and psychopathology. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-011-0107-2
43.
YuanK.-H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
