Although teacher–student relationship has been shown to be associated with bullying perpetration, little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this relationship. The present study investigated (a) the mediating effect of deviant peer affiliation in the relationship between teacher–student relationship and bullying perpetration and (b) the moderating effect of peer pressure in the relationship between deviant peer affiliation and bullying perpetration. Our theoretical model was examined with 2407 Chinese adolescents. Participants completed questionnaires regarding teacher–student relationship, bullying, deviant peer affiliation, and peer pressure. After controlling for gender and age, teacher–student relationship was significantly negatively associated with bullying perpetration. Mediation analysis indicated that deviant peer affiliation partially mediated the relation between teacher–student relationship and bullying perpetration. Moderated mediation analysis further revealed that the relationship between deviant peer affiliation and bullying perpetration was moderated by peer pressure. Specifically, for adolescents with high peer pressure, the relationship between deviant peer affiliation and bullying perpetration became much stronger. These results can contribute to design effective interventions aimed at preventing and reducing adolescents’ bullying perpetration.
ArcadepaniF. B.EskenaziD. Y. G.FidalgoT. M.HongJ. S. (2021). An exploration of the link between bullying perpetration and substance use: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(1), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019837593
2.
BaoZ.LiD.ZhangW.WangY. (2015). School climate and delinquency among Chinese adolescents: Analyses of effortful control as a moderator and deviant peer affiliation as a mediator. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9903-8
3.
BouchardK. L.SmithJ. D. (2016). Teacher-Student relationship quality and children’s bullying experiences with peers: Reflecting on the mesosystem. The Educational Forum, 81(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2016.1243182
4.
BurtS. A.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2009). Nonshared environmental mediation of the association between deviant peer affiliation and adolescent externalizing behaviors over time: Results from a cross-lagged monozygotic twin differences design. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016687
5.
CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In HawkinsJ. D. (Ed.) Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). Cambridge University Press.
6.
Chan (Oliver)H. C.WongD. S. W. (2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies: Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.010
7.
ChoY.ChungO.-B. (2011). A mediated moderation model of conformative peer bullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(3), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9538-0
8.
ChoS.HongJ. S.SterzingP. R.WooY. (2017). Parental attachment and bullying in South Korean adolescents: Mediating effects of low self-control, deviant Peer associations, and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 63(9), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714968
9.
CotterK. L.SmokowskiP. R. (2016). An investigation of relational risk and promotive factors associated with adolescent female aggression. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(5), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0700-1
10.
CutrínO.ManeiroL.SobralJ.Gómez-FraguelaJ. A. (2019). Longitudinal effects of parenting mediated by deviant peers on violent and non-violent antisocial behaviour and substance use in adolescence. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018a12
11.
Da SilvaM. A.GonzalezJ. C.PersonG. L.MartinsS. S. (2020). Bidirectional association between bullying perpetration and internalizing problems among youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.022
12.
De VriesS. L.HoeveM.StamsG. J.AsscherJ. J. (2016). Adolescent-parent attachment and externalizing behavior: The mediating role of individual and social factors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-9999-5
13.
DeWitD. J.OffordD. R.SanfordM.RyeB. J.ShainM.WrightR. (2000). The effect of school culture on adolescent behavioural problems: Self-esteem, attachment to learning, and peer approval of deviance as mediating mechanisms. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/082957350001600102
14.
Di StasioM. R.SavageR.BurgosG. (2016). Social comparison, competition and teacher-student relationships in junior high school classrooms predicts bullying and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.10.002
15.
EastmanM.FosheeV.EnnettS.Sotres-AlvarezD.ReyesH. L. M.FarisR.NorthK. (2018). Profiles of internalizing and externalizing symptoms associated with bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.007
16.
ErtesvågS. K. (2016). Students who bully and their perceptions of teacher support and monitoring. British Educational Research Journal, 42(5), 826–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3240
17.
EvansC. B. R.SmokowskiP. R. (2015). Theoretical explanations for bullying in school: How ecological processes propagate perpetration and victimization. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0432-2
18.
FarringtonD. P.KazemianL.PiqueroA. R. (2018). The Oxford handbook of developmental and life-course criminology. Oxford Handbooks.
19.
GiniG.PozzoliT.BusseyK. (2015). The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9920-7
20.
GrantN. J.MerrinG. J.KingM. T.EspelageD. L. (2019). Examining within-person and between-person associations of family violence and peer deviance on bullying perpetration among middle school students. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000210
21.
HamelN.SchwabS.WahlS. (2021). Bullying: Group differences of being victim and being bully and the influence of social relations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68(6), 100964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100964
22.
HanY.KimH.MaJ. (2015). School bonds and the onset of substance use among Korean youth: An examination of social control theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3), 2923–2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302923
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
24.
HinnantJ. B.ErathS. A.TuK. M.El-SheikhM. (2016). Permissive parenting, deviant peer affiliations, and delinquent behavior in adolescence: The moderating role of sympathetic nervous system reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(6), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0114-8
25.
HinnantJ. B.Forman-AlbertiA. B. (2019). Deviant peer behavior and adolescent delinquency: Protective effects of inhibitory control, planning, or decision making?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(3), 682–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12405
26.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
27.
HongJ. S.KimD. H.PiqueroA. R. (2017). Assessing the links between punitive parenting, peer deviance, social isolation and bullying perpetration and victimization in South Korean adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.017
28.
JiaJ.LiD.LiX.ZhouY.WangY.SunW. (2017). Psychological security and deviant peer affiliation as mediators between teacher-student relationship and adolescent Internet addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.063
29.
JiaJ.LiD.LiX.ZhouY.WangY.SunW.ZhaoL. (2018). Peer victimization and adolescent Internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological security and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.042
30.
JiangG. R. (2002). Research on classroom social ecology environment. Central China Normal University Press.
31.
KallestadJ. H.OlweusD. (2003). Predicting teachers’ and schools’ implementation of the Olweus bullying prevention program: A multilevel study. Prevention and Treatment, 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.621a
32.
KretschmerT.VeenstraR.DekovićM.OldehinkelA. J. (2017). Bullying development across adolescence, its antecedents, outcomes, and gender-specific patterns. Development and Psychopathology, 29(3), 941–955. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000596
33.
LanX.MoscardinoU. (2019). Direct and interactive effects of perceived teacher-student relationship and grit on student wellbeing among stay-behind early adolescents in urban China. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.12.003
34.
LeeS. S.-T.WongD. S.-W. (2009). School, parents, and peer factors in relation to Hong Kong students’ bullying. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 15(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2009.9748030
35.
LinS.YuC.ChenW.TianY.ZhangW. (2018). Peer victimization and aggressive behavior among Chinese adolescents: Delinquent peer affiliation as a mediator and parental knowledge as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01036
36.
LiD.ZhouY.LiX.ZhouZ. (2016). Perceived school climate and adolescent Internet addiction: The mediating role of deviant peer affiliation and the moderating role of effortful control. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.015
37.
LokeA. Y.MakY. W.WuC. S. T. (2016). The association of peer pressure and peer affiliation with the health risk behaviors of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Public Health, 137, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.024
38.
LongobardiC.IottiN. O.JungertT.SettanniM. (2018). Student-teacher relationships and bullying: The role of student social status. Journal of Adolescence, 63, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.001
39.
LongobardiC.SettanniM.PrinoL. E.FabrisM. A.MarengoD. (2019). Students’ psychological adjustment in normative school transitions from kindergarten to high school: Investigating the role of teacher-student relationship quality. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01238
40.
LutharS. S.CrossmanE. J.SmallP. J. (2015). Resilience and adversity. In LernerR. M.LambM. E. (Eds.) Socioemotional processes: 3. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 247–286). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy307
41.
MarengoD.FabrisM. A.PrinoL. E.SettanniM.LongobardiC. (2021). Student-teacher conflict moderates the link between students’ social status in the classroom and involvement in bullying behaviors and exposure to peer victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 87, 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.01.005
42.
McCoyS. S.DimlerL. M.SamuelsD. V.NatsuakiM. N. (2017). Adolescent susceptibility to deviant peer pressure: Does gender matter?Adolescent Research Review, 4(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0071-2
43.
MonahanK. C.SteinbergL.CauffmanE. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017417
44.
ObsuthI.MurrayA. L.MaltiT.SulgerP.RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2017). A non-bipartite propensity score analysis of the effects of teacher-student relationships on adolescent problem and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1661–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0534-y
PrinoL. E.LongobardiC.FabrisM. A.ParadaR. H.SettanniM. (2019). Effects of bullying victimization on internalizing and externalizing symptoms: The mediating role of alexithymia. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2586–2593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01484-8
48.
SabolT. J.PiantaR. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672262
49.
SantorD. A.MesserveyD.KusumakarV. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005152515264
50.
SettanniM.LongobardiC.SclavoE.FraireM.PrinoL. E. (2015). Development and psychometric analysis of the student-teacher relationship scale-short form. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(898), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00898
SullivanC. J. (2006). Early adolescent delinquency: Assessing the role of childhood problems, family environment, and peer pressure. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006292656
53.
SwiftL. E.HubbardJ. A.BookhoutM. K.GrassettiS. N.SmithM. A.MorrowM. T. (2017). Teacher factors contributing to dosage of the KiVa anti-bullying program. Journal of School Psychology, 65, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.07.005
54.
TaliaferroL. A.DotyJ. L.GowerA. L.QuernaK.RovitoM. J. (2020). Profiles of risk and protection for violence and bullying perpetration among adolescent boys. Journal of School Health, 90(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12867
55.
TalwarP (1998). The family and peer group influences in aggression. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 40(4), 346–349.
56.
TengZ.NieQ.ZhuZ.GuoC. (2019). Violent video game exposure and (Cyber)bullying perpetration among Chinese youth: The moderating role of trait aggression and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106193
57.
ThompsonE. L.MehariK. R.FarrellA. D. (2020). Deviant peer factors during early adolescence: Cause or consequence of physical aggression?Child Development, 91(2), Article e415–e431. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13242
58.
TianY.YuC.LinS.LuJ.LiuY.ZhangW. (2019). Parental psychological control and adolescent aggressive behavior: Deviant peer affiliation as a mediator and school connectedness as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00358
59.
WangC.SwearerS. M.LembeckP.CollinsA.BerryB. (2015). Teachers matter: An examination of student-teacher relationships, attitudes toward bullying, and bullying behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2015.1056923
60.
WangX.YangL.GaoL.YangJ.LeiL.WangC. (2017a). Childhood maltreatment and Chinese adolescents’ bullying and defending: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Child Abuse and Neglect, 69, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.016
61.
WangX.YangJ.WangP.ZhangY.LiB.XieX.LeiL. (2020). Deviant peer affiliation and bullying perpetration in adolescents: The mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of moral identity. The Journal of Psychology, 154(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1696733
62.
WangZ.YuC.ZhangW.ChenY.ZhuJ.LiuQ. (2017b). School climate and adolescent aggression: A moderated mediation model involving deviant peer affiliation and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.004
63.
WilliamsL. R.AnthonyE. K. (2013). A model of positive family and peer relationships on adolescent functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(3), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9876-1
64.
YangJ.WangX.LeiL. (2020). Perceived school climate and adolescents’ bullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and peers’ defending. Children and Youth Services Review, 109(2), 104716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104716
65.
YavuzerY.KarataşZ.CivilidağA.GündoğduR. (2014). The role of peer pressure, automatic thoughts and self-esteem on adolescents’ aggression. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 14(54), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.54.4
66.
YoonD.SnyderS. M.YoonS. (2020). Child maltreatment types and adolescent substance use: The role of deviant peer affiliation. Child & Family Social Work, 25(2), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12691
67.
YoonD.YoonS.YoonM.SnyderS. M. (2019). Developmental trajectories of deviant peer affiliation in adolescence: Associations with types of child maltreatment and substance use. Children and Youth Services Review, 105, 104446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104446
68.
ZhaiB.LiD.JiaJ.LiuY.SunW.WangY. (2019). Peer victimization and problematic internet use in adolescents: The mediating role of deviant peer affiliation and the moderating role of family functioning. Addictive Behaviors, 96, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.016
69.
ZhuJ.YuC.ZhangW.BaoZ.JiangY.ChenY.ZhenS. (2016). Peer victimization, deviant peer affiliation and impulsivity: Predicting adolescent problem behaviors. Child Abuse and Neglect, 58, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.06.008
