Teacher-Student and Student-Student Relationship Quality in Relation to Adolescents’ Defending Behaviors: A Moderated Polynomial Regression With Response Surface Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the unique and joint effects of teacher-student and student-student relationship quality on adolescents’ defending behaviors. Participants were 1,639 Chinese adolescents (52.51% girls, M_age = 14.49 years, SD = 1.11). They completed questionnaires on demographics, teacher-student relationship quality, student-student relationship quality, and psychological resilience at Time 1. After 7 months, they completed the defending behaviors measure at Time 2. Results indicated that both teacher-student and student-student relationship quality were positively and significantly associated with adolescents’ defending behaviors. Additionally, along the line of congruence (LOC), adolescents’ defending behaviors were higher when both teacher-student and student-student relationship quality were simultaneously high rather than low. Along the line of incongruence (LOIC), adolescents with high teacher-student relationship quality and low student-student relationship quality exhibited fewer defending behaviors compared to those with the opposite pattern. Furthermore, psychological resilience moderated the pattern along the LOC linking teacher-student and student-student relationship quality to defending behaviors, such that the positive association between simultaneously high relationship quality and defending behaviors was significant only among adolescents with high psychological resilience, but not among those with low psychological resilience. Psychological resilience did not significantly moderate the pattern along the LOIC. In conclusion, this study identifies distinct patterns along the LOC and LOIC of teacher-student and student-student relationship quality in relation to adolescents’ defending behaviors, with psychological resilience playing a moderating role in the pattern along the LOC.

Keywords

defending behaviors teacher-student relationship quality student-student relationship quality psychological resilience response surface analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afzal

Rafiq

Kanwal

(2023). The influence of teacher-student relationships on students’ academic achievement at university level. Gomal University Journal of Research, 39(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-39-01-06

Ahmadi

Noetel

Parker

Ryan

R. M.

Ntoumanis

Reeve

Dicke

Yeung

Ahmadi

Bartholomew

Chiu

T. K. F.

Curran

Erturan

Flunger

Frederick

Froiland

J. M.

González-Cutre

Haerens

Lonsdale

(2023). A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(8), 1158–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783

Ahmed

(2008). ‘Stop it, that’s enough’: Bystander intervention and its relationship to school connectedness and shame management. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 3(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450120802002548

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Berkowitz

Winstok

(2022). The association between teacher-student and peer relationships and the escalation of peer school victimization. Child Indicators Research, 15(6), 2243–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09961-1

Burger

Strohmeier

Spröber

Bauman

Rigby

(2015). How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004

Campbell-Sills

Stein

M. B.

(2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 20(6), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271

Chen

Zhang

Deater-Deckard

(2020). A “defender protective effect” in multiple-role combinations of bullying among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7–8), 1587–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517698278

Cheng

Dong

Zhong

Yao

(2020). Psychometric properties of the 10-item connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC-10) in Chinese undergraduates and depressive patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 261, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.018

10.

Choi

Cho

Y. I.

(2013). Influence of psychological and social factors on bystanders’ roles in school bullying among Korean-American students in the United States. School Psychology International, 34(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311430406

11.

Chung

J. O. K.

Lam

K. K. W.

K. Y.

Cheung

A. T.

L. L. K.

Gibson

W. H. C.

(2020). Relationships among resilience, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(13–14), 2396–2405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318800159

12.

Contreras

González

Láscar

López

(2022). Negative teacher-student and student-student relationships are associated with school dropout: Evidence from a large-scale longitudinal study in Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 91, Article 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102576

13.

Cui

S. M.

(2021). School climate, bystanders’ responses, and bullying perpetration in the context of rural-to-urban migration in China. Deviant Behavior, 42(11), 1416–1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1752601

14.

Demaray

M. K.

Malecki

C. K.

(2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086213

15.

Deng

Yang

(2021). Adolescent empathy influences bystander defending in school bullying: A three-level meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 690898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690898

16.

Drolet

Arcand

(2013). Positive development, sense of belonging, and support of peers among early adolescents: Perspectives of different actors. International Education Studies, 6(4), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p29

17.

Edwards

J. R.

Parry

M. E.

(1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613. https://doi.org/10.2307/256822

18.

Evans

C. B.

Smokowski

P. R.

(2015). Prosocial bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0338-5

19.

Evans

C. B.

Smokowski

P. R.

(2017). Negative bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital deprivation and anti-social capital. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 48(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0657-0

20.

Gabrielli

Rizzi

Carbone

Piras

E. M.

(2021). School interventions for bullying-cyberbullying prevention in adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP projects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), Article 11697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111697

21.

Goldstein

Brooks

R. B.

(2013). Why study resilience? In Goldstein

Brooks

R. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). Springer Science + Business Media.

22.

González Moreno

Molero Jurado

M. D. M.

(2024). Self-esteem and resilience in adolescence: Differences between bystander roles and their implications in school violence in Spain. Future Times, 2(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/future2020006

23.

Holt-Lunstad

(2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902

24.

Jadoon

A. I.

Khan

Syeda Tehmina Naz Bukhari

N. T. S.

Gilani

S. Z.

Ishfaq

Ullah

(2022). Effect of teacher-student relationship on pro-social behavior and academic achievement of secondary school students. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 21(1), 331–337.

25.

Jenkins

L. N.

Fredrick

S. S.

(2017). Social capital and bystander behavior in bullying: Internalizing problems as a barrier to prosocial intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0637-0

26.

Jiang

(2002). Class social ecological environment research. Central China Normal University Press.

27.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

(2007). Preventing bullying: Developing and maintaining positive relationships among schoolmates. In National coalition against bullying conference (pp. 3–4).

28.

Jungert

Piroddi

Thornberg

(2016). Early adolescents’ motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student-teacher relationships: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.001

29.

Kärnä

Voeten

Poskiparta

Salmivalli

(2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’ behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0052

30.

Kollerová

Yanagida

Mazzone

Soukup

Strohmeier

(2018). “They think that I should defend”: Effects of peer and teacher injunctive norms on defending victimized classmates in early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2424–2439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0918-2

31.

Laka

(2020). The influence of parental involvement, teacher, and peer support on mastery goal orientation and self-efficacy among vocational high school students. Sapa: Jurnal Kateketik dan Pastoral, 5(2), 13–28.

32.

Lambe

L. J.

Della Cioppa

Hong

I. K.

Craig

W. M.

(2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007

33.

Laursen

Veenstra

(2021). Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12606

34.

Leipold

Greve

(2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14(1), 40–50.

35.

Lerner

R. M.

(2004). Diversity in individual↔context relations as the basis for positive development across the life span: A developmental systems perspective for theory, research, and application (the 2004 society for the study of human development presidential address). Research in Human Development, 1(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427617rhd0104_5

36.

Levantini

Gelati

Camodeca

(2024). Defending behavior in school bullying: The role of empathic self-efficacy, social preference, and student-teacher relationship. Social Psychology of Education, 27(4), 2015–2029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09892-5

37.

Lewin

(1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/218177

38.

Lodge

Frydenberg

(2005). The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: Positive steps toward promoting peaceful schools. Theory Into Practice, 44(4), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4404_6

39.

Longobardi

Settanni

Lin

Fabris

M. A.

(2021). Student-teacher relationship quality and prosocial behaviour: The mediating role of academic achievement and a positive attitude towards school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12378

40.

Mesman

Vreeker

Hillegers

(2021). Resilience and mental health in children and adolescents: An update of the recent literature and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 34(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000741

41.

Naglieri

LeBuffe

(2006). Measuring resilience in children. In Goldstein

Brooks

(Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 107–123): Springer.

42.

Padrón

Y. N.

Waxman

H. C.

Lee

Y. H.

(2014). Classroom learning environment differences between resilient, average, and nonresilient middle school students in reading. Education and Urban Society, 46(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124512446217

43.

Patterson

L. J.

Allan

Cross

(2017). Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 19(3), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815606369

44.

Pietrzak

R. H.

Johnson

D. C.

Goldstein

M. B.

Malley

J. C.

Rivers

A. J.

Morgan

C. A.

Southwick

S. M.

(2010). Psychosocial buffers of traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, and psychosocial difficulties in veterans of operations enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom: The role of resilience, unit support, and postdeployment social support. Journal of Affective Disorders, 120(1–3), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.04.015

45.

Porter

J. R.

Smith-Adcock

(2011). Children who help victims of bullying: Implications for practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 33(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-011-9121-9

46.

Pouwels

J. L.

Salmivalli

Saarento

van den Berg

Y. H.

Lansu

T. A.

Cillessen

A. H.

(2018). Predicting adolescents’ bullying participation from developmental trajectories of social status and behavior. Child Development, 89(4), 1157–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12794

47.

Pöyhönen

Juvonen

Salmivalli

(2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0046

48.

Pozzoli

Ang

R. P.

Gini

(2012a). Bystanders’ reactions to bullying: A cross-cultural analysis of personal correlates among Italian and Singaporean students. Social Development, 21(4), 686–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00651.x

49.

Pozzoli

Gini

(2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9

50.

Pozzoli

Gini

(2013). Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431612440172

51.

Pozzoli

Gini

Vieno

(2012b). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83(6), 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x

52.

Pronk

Olthof

Aleva

E. A.

van der Meulen

Vermande

M. M.

Goossens

F. A.

(2020). Longitudinal associations between adolescents’ bullying-related indirect defending, outsider behavior, and peer-group status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(Suppl 1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12450

53.

Putnam

R. D.

(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

54.

Ruiz-Robledillo

De Andrés-García

Pérez-Blasco

González-Bono

Moya-Albiol

(2014). Highly resilient coping entails better perceived health, high social support and low morning cortisol levels in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 686–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.12.007

55.

Sainio

Veenstra

Huitsing

Salmivalli

(2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410378068

56.

Salmivalli

(2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

57.

Salmivalli

(2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222

58.

Salmivalli

Voeten

Poskiparta

(2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090

59.

Shanock

L. R.

Baran

B. E.

Gentry

W. A.

Pattison

S. C.

Heggestad

E. D.

(2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4

60.

Shi

Huang

Hou

Song

(2022). Does cyberostracism reduce prosocial behaviors? The protective role of psychological resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074388

61.

Spadafora

Marini

Z. A.

Volk

A. A.

(2020). Should I defend or should I go? An adaptive, qualitative examination of the personal costs and benefits associated with bullying intervention. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573518793752

62.

Thornberg

Pozzoli

Gini

(2022). Defending or remaining passive as a bystander of school bullying in Sweden: The role of moral disengagement and antibullying class norms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP18666–NP18689. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211037427

63.

Thornberg

Wänström

Hong

J. S.

Espelage

D. L.

(2017). Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002

64.

Unicef . (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNICEF, Paris.

65.

Valkov

Lavrentsova

(2019). The effects of student-teacher and student-student relationship on school engagement: An empirical research in Bulgaria. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 91(3), 320–331.

66.

Waasdorp

T. E.

Clary

L. K.

Bradshaw

C. P.

(2022). School climate and bullying bystander responses in middle and high school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 80, Article 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101412

67.

Wachs

Bilz

Niproschke

Schubarth

(2019). Bullying intervention in schools: A multilevel analysis of teachers’ success in handling bullying from the students’ perspective. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(5), 642–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618780423

68.

Wachs

Görzig

Wright

M. F.

Schubarth

Bilz

(2020). Associations among adolescents’ relationships with parents, peers, and teachers, self-efficacy, and willingness to intervene in bullying: A social cognitive approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020420

69.

Wang

Swearer

S. M.

Lembeck

Collins

Berry

(2015). Teachers matter: An examination of student-teacher relationships, attitudes toward bullying, and bullying behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2015.1056923

70.

Wang

Yang

Gao

Yang

Lei

Wang

(2017b). Childhood maltreatment and Chinese adolescents’ bullying and defending: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 69, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.016

71.

Wang

Zhao

Wang

Xie

Wang

Lei

(2017a). Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: The mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(4), 708–717. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.079

72.

Wood

Smith

Varjas

Meyers

(2017). School personnel social support and nonsupport for bystanders of bullying: Exploring student perspectives. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.12.003

73.

Y. J.

Lee

(2022). The most salient global predictors of adolescents’ subjective Well-Being: Parental support, peer support, and anxiety. Child Indicators Research, 15(5), 1601–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09937-1

74.

Zhu

Zhang

Huang

(2023). Unsociability and social adjustment of Chinese preschool migrant children: The moderating role of resilience. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1074217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074217

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.09 MB

0.00 MB