Communal coping has been linked to better psychological and physical health across a variety of stressful contexts. However, there has been no experimental work causally linking communal coping to relationship and health outcomes. In addition, research has emphasized the collaboration over the shared appraisal component of communal coping. The present study sought to isolate the role of appraisal by manipulating whether dyads viewed a stressor as shared or individual. Friend dyads (n = 64 dyads; 128 participants) were randomly assigned to view a stressor as either a shared or an individual problem, but both groups were allowed to work together. Across self-report and observational measures dyads reported more collaboration and support, better relationship outcomes, and more positive mood after the stressor in the shared than the individual appraisal group. This is the first laboratory evidence to establish causal links of communal coping—specifically shared appraisal—to positive relationship and health outcomes.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
BaucomK. J.BaucomB. R.ChristensenA. (2012). Do the naïve know best? The predictive power of naïve ratings of couple interactions. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 983–994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028680
4.
BergC. A.HelgesonV. S.TracyE. L.ButnerJ. E.KellyC. S.Van VleetM.LitchmanM. L. (2020). Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes. Health Psychology, 39(8), 689–699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000871
5.
BergC. A.SkinnerM.KoK.ButlerJ. M.PalmerD. L.ButnerJ.WeibeD. (2009). The fit between stress appraisal and dyadic coping in understanding perceived coping effectiveness for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(4), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015556
6.
BergC. A.WiebeD. J.ButnerJ.BloorL.BradstreetC.UpchurchR.HayesJStephensonR.NailL.PattonG. (2008). Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 505–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012687
7.
BodenmannG. (2018, July12–16). Dyadic coping: What we know and where we could go. Keynote talk at the 2018 International Association for Relationships Research Annual Meeting, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
8.
CohenS. E.SymeS. L. (1985). Social support and health. Academic Press.
9.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791
10.
DiMatteoM. R. (2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 23(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207
11.
FeketeE. M.StephensM. A. P.MickelsonK. D.DruleyJ. A. (2007). Couples’ support provision during illness: The role of perceived emotional responsiveness. Families, Systems, & Health, 25(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.1037/1091-7527.25.2.204
12.
HelgesonV. S.BergC. A.KellyC. S.Van VleetM.ZajdelM.TracyE. L.LitchmanM. L. (2019). Patient and partner illness appraisals and health among adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 42(3), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-0001-1
13.
HelgesonV. S.HochstedlerK.EssienI. (2016, July20–24). Effects of manipulated communal coping on dating couples coping with a stressor[Paper presentation]. International Association of Relationship Research, Toronto, Canada.
14.
HelgesonV. S.JakubiakB.SeltmanH.HausmannL.KorytkowskiM. (2017). Implicit and explicit communal coping in couples with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(7), 1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516669604
15.
HelgesonV. S.JakubiakB.Van VleetM.ZajdelM. (2018). Communal coping and adjustment to chronic illness: Theory update and evidence. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 22(2), 170–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317735767
16.
JohnsonM. D.AndersonJ. R.WalkerA.WilcoxA.LewisV. L.RobbinsD. C. (2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 722–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034006
17.
KaranA.RosenthalR.RobbinsM. L. (2019). Meta-analytic evidence that we-talk predicts relationship and personal functioning in romantic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2624–2651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518795336
18.
KirschbaumC.PirkeK. M.HellhammerD. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’—A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1–2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004
19.
KudielkaB. M.HellhammerD. H.KirschbaumC. (2007). Ten years of research with the Trier Social Stress Test—Revisited. In Harmon-JonesE.WinkielmanP. (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 56–83). The Guilford Press.
20.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
21.
LeeJ.HelgesonV. S.Van VleetM.TracyE. L.de GreyR. G. K.ZajdelM.BergC. A. (2020). Implications of we-talk for relationships and health among patients with type 1 diabetes and their spouses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519865613
22.
LyonsR. F.MickelsonK. D.SullivanM. J.CoyneJ. C. (1998). Coping as a communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 579–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155001
23.
PennebakerJ. W.BoydR. L.JordanK.BlackburnK. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/31333
24.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
RohrbaughM. J.ShohamV.CoyneJ. C.CranfordJ. A.SonnegaJ. S.NicklasJ. M. (2004). Beyond the “self” in self-efficacy: Spouse confidence predicts patient survival following heart failure. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.184
27.
RohrbaughM. J.ShohamV.SkoyenJ. A.JensenM.MehlM. R. (2012). We-talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple-focused intervention for health-compromised smokers. Family Process, 51(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01388.x
28.
RottmannN.HansenD. G.LarsenP. V. (2015). Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychology, 34(5), 486–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000218
29.
SlatcherR. B.SelcukE.OngA. D. (2015). Perceived partner responsiveness predicts diurnal cortisol profiles 10 years later. Psychological Science, 26(7), 972–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615575022
30.
TriefP. M.FisherL.SandbergJ.CibulaD. A.DimmockJ.HesslerD. M.ForkenP.WeinstockR. S. (2016). Health and psychosocial outcomes of a telephonic couples behavior change intervention in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 39(12), 2165–2173. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0035
31.
UchinoB. N. (2006). Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5
32.
UsalaP. D.HertzogC. (1989). Measurement of affective states in adults: Evaluation of an adjective rating scale instrument. Research on Aging, 11(4), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027589114001
33.
Van VleetM.HelgesonV. S.SeltmanH. J.KorytkowskiM. T.HausmannL. R. M. (2018). Communally coping with diabetes: An observational investigation using the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(5), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000414
34.
Van VleetM.HelgesonV. S.SeltmanH. J.KorytkowskiM. T.HausmannL. R. M. (2019). An examination of the communal coping process in recently diagnosed diabetes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1297–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518761226
35.
WooldridgeJ. S.RanbyK. W. (2018, April). A couples-based approach for increasing physical activity among couples with type 2 diabetes: A preliminary study[Poster presentation]. 38th Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
36.
ZajdelM.HelgesonV. S. (2020). Communal coping: A multi-method approach with links to relationships and health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(5), 1700–1721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520903811
37.
ZajdelM.HelgesonV. S.NaqviJ.SeltmanH.KorytkowskiM. (2019, March). The role of daily appraisal and collaboration in coping with type 2 diabetes[Poster presentation]. 39th Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
38.
ZajdelM.HelgesonV. S.SeltmanH. J.KorytkowskiM. T.HausmannL. R. (2018). Daily communal coping in couples with type 2 diabetes: Links to mood and self-care. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax047
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
