Reciprocal self-disclosure and rejection strategies on bumble

Abstract

Dating apps are an increasingly common element of modern dating, yet little research describes users’ experiences rejecting potential partners through these apps. This study examines how female Bumble users reject potential partners online in relation to self-disclosure, perceived partner disclosure, pre-rejection stress, and app usage. To investigate these issues, we conducted an online survey of 419 female Bumble users who had recently rejected someone through the app. Results revealed that women on Bumble employ ghosting strategies far more often than confrontational rejection and suggest that the degree to which women self-disclose, perceive a partner’s self-disclosure, and experience pre-rejection stress may impact their rejection strategies. This study informs the hyperpersonal model by demonstrating that reciprocal disclosure may characterize online dating interactions—even in relationships that fail to reach the face-to-face stage. However, results also broach the possibility of communication burnout in online dating, in which some users may lessen self-disclosure after extensive app usage.

Keywords

Online dating romantic rejection self-disclosure ghosting interpersonal relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abad-Santos

(2017). Ghosting, the easiest way to dump someone, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2015/7/2/8886787/ghosting-dating-explained

Banks

Westerman

D. K.

Sharabi

L. L.

(2017). A mere holding effect: Haptic influences on impression formation through mobile dating apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.035.

Baumeister

R. F.

Wotman

S. R.

Stillwell

A. M.

(1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394.

Bivens

Hoque

A. S.

(2018). Programming sex, gender, and sexuality: Infrastructural failures in the “feminist” dating app Bumble. Canadian Journal of Communication, 43, 444-459. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2019v44n3a3375.

Clement

. (2019). Most popular online dating apps in the United States as of September 2019, by audience size. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/826778

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

(1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.

Dai

Shin

S. Y.

Kashian

Jang

Walther

J. B.

(2016). The influence of responses to self-disclosure on liking in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 394-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15602515.

De Wiele

C. V.

Campbell

J. F.

(2019). From swiping to ghosting: Conceptualizing rejection in mobile dating. In Hetsroni

Tuncez

(Eds.), It happened on Tinder: Reflections and studies on internet-infused dating (pp. 158–175). Institute of Network Cultures.

Deri

Zitek

E. M.

(2017). Did you reject me for someone else? Rejections that are comparative feel worse. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(12), 1675-1685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217726988.

10.

Fitzpatrick

Birnholtz

(2018). “I shut the door”: Interactions, tensions, and negotiations from a location-based social app. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2469-2488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817725064.

11.

Freedman

Powell

D. N.

Williams

K. D.

(2019). Ghosting and destiny: Implicit theories of relationships predict beliefs about ghosting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 905-924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517748791.

12.

Gibbs

J. L.

Ellison

N. B.

Heino

R. D.

(2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 3(2), 152-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285368.

13.

Grøntvedt

T. G.

Bendixen

Botnen

E. O.

Kennair

L. E. O.

(2020). Hook, line and sinker: Do Tinder matches and meet ups lead to one-night stands? Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00222-z.

14.

Hall

J. A.

Park

Song

Cody

M. J.

(2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509349633.

15.

Hance

M. A.

Blackhart

Dew

(2018). Free to be me: The relationship between the true self, rejection sensitivity, and the use of online dating sites. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1389684.

16.

Hancock

Keast

Ellis

(2017). The impact of cyber dating abuse on self-esteem: The mediating role of emotional distress. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-2-2.

17.

Hill

C. T.

Stull

D. E.

(1982). Disclosure reciprocity: Conceptual and measurement issues. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(4), 238–244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3033919

18.

Jiang

L. C.

Bazarova

N. N.

Hancock

J. T.

(2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37, 58-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x.

19.

Jiang

L. C.

Bazarova

N. N.

Hancock

J. T.

(2013). From perception to behavior: Disclosure reciprocity and the intensification of intimacy in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 40(1), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211405313.

20.

Kashian

Jang

Shin

S. Y.

Dai

Walther

J. B.

(2017). Self-disclosure and liking in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.041.

21.

Koessler

R. B.

Kohut

Campbell

(2019a). When your boo becomes a ghost: The association between breakup strategy and breakup role in experiences of relationship dissolution. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.230.

22.

Koessler

R. B.

Kohut

Campbell

L. J.

(2019b). Integration and expansion of qualitative analyses of relationship dissolution through ghosting. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3kvdx.

23.

Lawson

H. M.

Leck

(2006). Dynamics of Internet dating. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305283402.

24.

LeFebvre

(2017). Phantom lovers: Ghosting as a relationship dissolution strategy in the technological age. In Punyanunt-Carter

NM.

Wrench

J.S.

(Eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 219-235). Lexington Books.

25.

LeFebvre

L. E.

Allen

Rasner

R. D.

Garstad

Wilms

Parrish

(2019). Ghosting in emerging adults’ romantic relationships: The digital dissolution disappearance strategy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(2), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618820519.

26.

LeFebvre

L. E.

Fan

(2020). Ghosted?: Navigating strategies for reducing uncertainty and implications surrounding ambiguous loss. Personal Relationships, 27(2), 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12322.

27.

Manning

Denker

K. J.

Johnson

(2019). Justifications for ‘ghosting out’ of developing or ongoing romantic relationships: Anxieties regarding digitally-mediated romantic interaction. In Hetsroni

Tuncez

(Eds.), It happened on Tinder: Reflections and studies on internet-infused dating (pp. 114–132). Institute of Network Cultures.

28.

Miller

L. C.

Berg

J. H.

Archer

R. L.

(1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self–disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234-1244. https://doi/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234.

29.

Musan

(2020). “Does online dating harm your mental wellbeing?”—The relationship between online dating rejection and mental wellbeing and the moderating role of self-compassion. [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis]. University of Twente.

30.

Navarro

Larrañaga

Yubero

Víllora

(2020). Psychological correlates of ghosting and breadcrumbing experiences: A preliminary study among adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031116.

31.

Nguyen

Bin

Y. S.

Campbell

(2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0277.

32.

Peter

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2006). Individual differences in perceptions of Internet communication. European Journal of Communication, 21, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105064046.

33.

Pronk

T. M.

Denissen

J. J. A.

(2020). A rejection mind-set: Choice overload in online dating. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 388-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619866189.

34.

Pruchniewska

(2020). “I like that it’s my choice a couple different times”: Gender, affordances, and user experience on Bumble dating. International Journal of Communication 14, 2422–2439. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12657/3072

35.

Richardson

Cannon

Teichert

Vance

Kramer

Barter

King

Callahan

(2020). Religion-focused dating apps: A q methodology study on the uses of Mutual. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 10148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101448.

36.

Rosen

L. D.

Whaling

Carrier

L. M.

Cheever

N. A.

Rokkum

(2013). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2501-2511. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338964/.

37.

Ruppel

E. K.

Gross

Stoll

Peck

B. S.

Allen

Kim

S.-Y.

(2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12179.

38.

Schouten

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2009). An experimental test of processes underlying self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), 3. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4227/3270

39.

Sharabi

L. L.

Caughlin

J. P.

(2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24, 370–391.

40.

Sharabi

L. L.

Dykstra-DeVette

T. A.

(2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11-12), 3389-3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518822780.

41.

Song

Lee

S. Y.

Kim

(2019). Does mindset matter for using social networking sites?: Understanding motivations for and uses of Instagram with growth versus fixed mindset. International Journal of Advertising, 38(6), 886-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1637614.

42.

Sprecher

Hendrick

S. S.

(2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857-877. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803.

43.

Sprecher

Zimmerman

Abrahams

E. M.

(2010). Choosing compassionate strategies to end a relationship. Social Psychology, 41(2), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000010.

44.

Stratmoen

Rivera

E. D.

Saucier

D. A.

(2020). “Sorry, I already have a boyfriend”: Masculine honor beliefs and perceptions of women’s use of deceptive rejection behaviors to avert unwanted romantic advances. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(2), 467-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519865615.

45.

Sumter

S. R.

Vandenbosch

Ligtenberg

(2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009.

46.

Tanner

Tabo

P.Q.

(2018). Ladies first: The influence of mobile dating applications on the psychological empowerment of female users. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 21, 289-317. https://doi.org/10.28945/4137.

47.

Tidwell

L. C.

Walther

J. B.

(2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317-348. https://doi/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x.

48.

Timmermans

Hermans

Opree

S. J.

(2020). Gone with the wind: Exploring mobile daters’ ghosting experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520970287.

49.

Tong

S. T.

Walther

J. B.

(2010). Just say ‘‘no thanks’’: Romantic rejection in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(4), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510384895.

50.

Vogels

E. A.

(2020). 10 facts about Americans and online dating. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/06/10-facts-about-americans-and-online-dating/

51.

Walther

J. B.

(2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002.

52.

Walther

J. B.

(2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In Knapp

M. L.

Daly

J. A.

(Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 443–480). Sage.

53.

Walther

J.B.

Van Der Heide

Ramierez

Burgoon

J.K.

Pena

(2015). Interpersonal and hyperpersonal dimensions of computer-mediated communication. In Shyam Sundar

(Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 3–22). Wiley Blackwell.

54.

Watson

W.K.

Stelle

(2011). Online dating: Adults self descriptions and preferences [Paper presentation]. 64th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Gerontological Society, Boston, MA.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB