Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-5
External stressors and trajectories of marital quality during the early years of Chinese marriage: Buffering effects of resources at multiple ecological levels
Drawing from the stress resistance process within the conservation of resources theory, this study examined how resources at multiple ecological levels—personal (self-esteem), relational (spousal support), and social network (relationships with parents and parents-in-law)—moderate the spillover and crossover effects from external stressors to trajectories of marital quality. We used three-annual-wave, dyadic data from 268 heterosexual Chinese couples who were at the beginning stages of marriage. Consistent with theory, personal, relational, and social network resources all buffered the detrimental effects of external stressors for marital quality. Further, nuanced findings emerged, likely given the social cultural context in contemporary China. Specifically, gender differences emerged in whether a specific resource attenuated the detrimental effects of external stressors (e.g., husbands’ vs. wives’ self-esteem attenuated detrimental effects of external stressors). Moreover, opposite patterns existed for the short-term versus long-term results for husbands’ relational resources. In sum, our findings highlight that when helping couples cope with stressors, it is necessary to (a) include available resources at multiple ecological levels (personal, relational, social network) and (b) consider whether social cultural backgrounds may have influenced the effectiveness of a specific resource.
AndersonS. F.SalkR. H.HydeJ. S. (2015). Stress in romantic relationships and adolescent depressive symptoms: Influence of parental support. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(3), 339–348. http://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000089.
2.
BarryR. A.BundeM.BrockR. L.LawrenceE. (2009). Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 48–57. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0014174.
3.
BodenmannG.RandallA. K.FalconierM. K. (2016). Coping in couples: The systemic-transactional model. In FalconierM. K.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. Routledge.
4.
BranchM. (2014). Malignant side effects of null-hypothesis significance testing. Theory & Psychology, 24(2), 256–277.
5.
BreitensteinC. J.MilekA.NussbeckF. W.DavilaJ.BodenmannG. (2018). Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction in late adolescent couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(5), 770–790. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517698049.
6.
BucxF.van WelF.KnijnT. (2012). Life course status and exchanges of support between young adults and parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 101–115. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00883.x.
7.
BürknerP.-C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the r package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. http://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017.
8.
CalleaA.Lo PrestiA.MaunoS.UrbiniF. (2017). The associations of quantitative/qualitative job insecurity and well-being: The role of self-esteem. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(1), 46–56. http://doi.org/10.1037/str0000091.
9.
CaoH.FineM.FangX.ZhouN. (2019). Chinese adult children’s perceived parents’ satisfaction with adult children’s marriage, in-law relationship quality, and adult children’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1098–1122. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518755319.
10.
ChenZ.FiskeS. T.LeeT. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 765–778. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9585-9.
11.
ChongA.GordonA. E.DonB. P. (2017). Emotional support from parents and in-laws: The roles of gender and contact. Sex Roles, 76(5–6), 369–379. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0587-0.
12.
ChuC. Y. C.XieY.YuR. R. (2011). Coresidence with elderly parents: A comparative study of southeast China and Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 120–135. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00793.x.
13.
ClarkJ. E.OsborneJ. W.GallagherP.WatsonS. (2016). A simple method for optimising transformation of non-parametric data: An illustration by reference to cortisol assays. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 31(4), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.2528.
14.
DanielsbackaM.TanskanenA. O.RotkirchA. (2015). Impact of genetic relatedness and emotional closeness on intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 889–907. http://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12206.
15.
DumontM.ProvostM. A. (1999). Resilience in adolescents: Protective role of social support, coping strategies, self-esteem, and social activities on experience of stress and depression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(3), 343–363. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021637011732.
16.
EpsteinN. B.WerlinichC. A. (1999). The Relationship Issues Survey: A measure of areas of couple conflict. Unpublished questionnaire. : Department of Family Studies, University of Maryland.
17.
ErolR. Y.OrthU. (2013). Actor and partner effects of self-esteem on relationship satisfaction and the mediating role of secure attachment between the partners. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(1), 26–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.11.003.
18.
FelmleeD. H. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79(4), 1259–1287. http://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0039.
19.
Few-DemoA. L.AllenK. R. (2020). Gender, feminist, and intersectional perspectives on families: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12638.
20.
FinchamF. D.BradburyT. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 797–809. http://doi.org/10.2307/351973.
21.
FingermanK. L.GilliganM.VanderDriftL.PitzerL. (2012). In-law relationships before and after marriage: Husbands, wives, and their mothers-in-law. Research in Human Development, 9(2), 106–125. http://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2012.680843.
22.
FokH.-K.ChengS.-T. (2018). Intimate relationships and happiness in Asia: A critical review. In DemirM.SümerN. (Eds.), Close relationships and happiness across cultures (pp. 55–67). Springer.
23.
FonsecaG.CunhaD.CrespoC.RelvasA. P. (2016). Families in the context of macroeconomic crises: A systematic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(6), 687–697. http://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000230.
24.
GariépyG.HonkaniemiH.Quesnel-ValléeA. (2016). Social support and protection from depression: Systematic review of current findings in Western countries. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(4), 284–293. http://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.169094.
25.
GnambsT.SchroedersU. (2020). Cognitive abilities explain wording effects in the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Assessment, 27(2), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117746503.
26.
GreenbergerE.ChenC.DmitrievaJ.FarruggiaS. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Do they matter?Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8.
27.
HengstebeckN. D.HelmsH. M.RodriguezY. (2015). Spouses’ gender role attitudes, wives’ employment status, and Mexican-origin husbands’ marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 36(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14547416.
28.
HighA. C., & SteuberK. R. (2014). An examination of support (in)adequacy: Types, sources, and consequences of social support among infertile women. Communication Monographs, 81, 157-178. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.878868.
29.
HobfollS. E. (1985). Personal and social resources and the ecology of stress resistance. In ShaverP. (Ed.), Self, situations, and social behavior (pp. 265–290). Sage.
30.
HobfollS. E. (1988). The model of ecological congruence: Blueprint for understanding stress resistance. In HobfollS. E. (Ed.), The ecology of stress. Taylor & Francis.
31.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513.
32.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ.-P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640.
33.
HofmansJ (2017). Modeling psychological contract violation using dual regime models: An event-based approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(8), 1948. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01948.
34.
HorsleyG. C. (1997). In-laws: Extended family therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(1), 18-27.
35.
JiY. (2015). Asian families at the crossroads: A meeting of east, west, tradition, modernity, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12223.
36.
JiY.WuX.SunS.HeG. (2017). Unequal care, unequal work: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of gender inequality in post-reform urban China. Sex Roles, 77(2), 765–778. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0751-1.
37.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635.
38.
KimK.ChengY.-P.ZaritS. H.FingermanK. L. (2015). Relationships between adults and parents in Asia. In ChengS.-T.ChiI.FungH. H.LiL. W.WooJ. (Eds.), Successful aging: Asian perspectives (pp. 101–122). Springer.Successful Aging
39.
KruschkeJ. K.LiddellT. M. (2018). Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 155–177. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-0171272-1.
40.
Lachance-GrzelaM.BouchardG. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63(11), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9797-z.
41.
LakeE. T. (2002). Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index. Research in Nursing & Health, 25(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10032.
42.
LanJ.LiX.CaoH.ZhouN.LinX.DengL.FangX. (2017). Inequity of sacrifice and marital satisfaction in Chinese young couples. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(2), 169–192. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12153.
43.
LavnerJ. A.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2012). Incremental change or initial differences? Testing two models of marital deterioration. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(4), 606–616. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029052.
44.
LiX.CaoH.CurranM. A.FangX.ZhouN. (2020). Traditional gender ideology, work family conflict, and marital quality among chinese dual-earner couples: A moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 83(6), 622–635. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01125-1.
45.
LiX.CaoH.LanJ.JuX.ZhengY.ChenY.ZhouN.FangX. (2019). The association between transition pattern of marital conflict resolution styles and marital quality trajectory during the early years of Chinese marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 153–186. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517721380.
46.
LiX.CurranM. A.ZhouN.SeridoJ.ShimS.CaoH. (2019b). Financial behaviors and adult identity: Mediating analyses of a college cohort. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 64(101049). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101049 (Article 101419).
47.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford press.
48.
LiuF. (2019). Chinese young men’s construction of exemplary masculinity: The hegemony of Chenggong. Men and Masculinities, 22(2), 294–316. http://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17696911.
49.
LuiP. P.RollockD. (2018). Greater than the sum of its parts: Development of a measure of collectivism among Asians. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000163.
50.
MaierC. A.PriestJ. B. (2016). Perceived fairness, marital conflict, and depression: A dyadic data analysis. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 44(2), 95–109. http://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1145083.
51.
MäkikangasA.KinnunenU. (2003). Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: Self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(3), 537–557. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00217-9.
52.
MakowskiD.Ben-ShacharM. S.ChenS. H. A., & LüdeckeD. (2019). Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 2767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767.
53.
MarshH. W.HauK.‐T.WenZ.NagengastB.MorinA. J. S. (2013). Moderation. In LittleT. D. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (Vol. 2, pp. 361–386). Oxford University Press.
54.
McLarenH. J.WongK. R.NguyenK. N.MahamadachchiK. N. D. (2020). Covid-19 and women’s triple burden: Vignettes from Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Vietnam and Australia. Social Sciences, 9(5), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050087.
55.
Morr SerewiczM. C. (2006). The difficulties of in-law relationships. In KirkpatrickD. C.DuckS.FoleyM. K. (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The processes of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 101–118). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
56.
NauckB., & SuckowJ. (2006). Intergenerational relationships in cross-cultural comparison: How social networks frame intergenerational relations between mothers and grandmothers in Japan, Korea, China, Indonesia, Israel, Germany, and Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 27(8), 1159-1185.
57.
NeffL. A., & KarneyB. R. (2017). Acknowledging the elephant in the room: How stressful environmental contexts shape relationship dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13(1), 107-110. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013.
58.
NgK.-M.PelusoP. R.SmithS. D. (2010). Marital satisfaction, intimacy, enqing, and relationship stressors among Asians. In CarlsonJ.SperryL. (Eds.), The family therapy and counseling series. Recovering intimacy in love relationships: A clinician's guide (pp. 331–352). Taylor & Francis.
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(1), 141–151. http://doi.org/10.2307/351302.
61.
PedersenA.MikkelsenE.Cronin-FentonD.KristensenN.PhamT. M.PedersenL., & PetersenI. (2017). Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research. Clinical Epidemiology, 9(1), 157-166. http://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S129785.
62.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
63.
RandallA. K., & BodenmannG. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13(1), 96-106.
64.
ReidM.ReczekC. (2011). Stress and support in family relationships after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Family Issues, 32(10), 1397–1418. http://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11412497.
65.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. Basic Books.
66.
SarasonI. G.JohnsonJ. H.SiegelJ. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the life experiences survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 932–946. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.932.
67.
SchmeeckleM.SprecherS. (2004). Extended family and social networks. In VangelistiA. L. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 349–375). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
68.
SettlesB. H.ShengX.ZangY.ZhaoJ. (2013). The one-child policy and its impact on Chinese families. In ChanK. (Ed.), International handbook of Chinese families (pp. 627–646). Springer.
69.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (2006). Attachment theory, individual psychodynamics, and relationship functioning. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 251–271). Cambridge University Press.
70.
SprecherS.FelmleeD.OrbuchT. L.WillettsM. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In VangelistiA. L.ReisH. T.FitzpatrickM. A. (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 257–284). Cambridge University Press.
71.
SteelP.TarasV.UggerslevK.BoscoF. (2018). The happy culture: A theoretical, meta-analytic, and empirical review of the relationship between culture and wealth and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(2), 128–169. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317721372.
72.
StoryL. B.BradburyT. N. (2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1139–1162. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2003.10.002.
73.
TijmstraJ. (2018). Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 548–559. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1447-4.
74.
VanhoutteghemI.Van HoveG.D'haeneG.SoyezV. (2014). ‘I never thought I would have to do this’: Narrative study with siblings-in-law who live together with a family member with a disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 315–322. http://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12077.
75.
VehtariA.GelmanA., & GabryJ. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing, 27(5), 1413-1432. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4.
76.
WilliamsonH. C.LavnerJ. A. (2020). Trajectories of marital satisfaction in diverse newlywed couples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 597–604. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619865056.
77.
YangS.HarlowL. L.PuggioniG.ReddingC. A. (2017). A comparison of different methods of zero-inflated data analysis and an application in health surveys. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(1), 518–543. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1493598600.
78.
YangD. and ZhangY. (1999). Life event scale (LES): Rating scale for mental health. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25(1), 101–106(in Chinese).
79.
YoungC.RobertsR.WardL. (2019). Application of resilience theories in the transition to parenthood: A scoping review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1540860.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
