Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-1
The association between transition pattern of marital conflict resolution styles and marital quality trajectory during the early years of Chinese marriage
Based on three annual waves of data obtained from 194 Chinese couples during the first few years of marriage, this study examined how couples’ marital conflict resolution styles might change over time and also the association between such patterns of changes and the developmental trajectories of marital quality. Using latent transition analysis, at each of the three waves, we consistently identified four groups of couples based on the various types of strategies they employed when resolving marital conflicts: Cooperative Couples, Avoidant Couples, Aggressive Couples, and Aggressive Wife-Avoidant Husband Couples, and then we further classified couples into five groups based on their conflict resolution style transition patterns across the three waves: Steadily Constructive Pattern Group, More Constructive Pattern Group, Unpredictable Pattern Group, More Destructive Pattern Group, and Steadily Destructive Pattern Group. Lastly, utilizing the dyadic growth curve model, we linked the conflict resolution profiles identified at the first wave to both the initial levels of and the change rates of marital quality across waves and also linked the further identified conflict resolution style transition pattern groups to the change rates of marital quality across waves.
AmatoP. R.JohnsonD. R.BoothA.RogersS. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00001.x
2.
BabcockJ. C.WaltzJ.JacobsonN. S.GottmanJ. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40–50. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.40
3.
BauerD. J.ShanahanM. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Beijing Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press.
5.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
6.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
7.
BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 862–879. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00059.x
8.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B. (2009). Perceived match or mismatch on the Gottman’s conflict styles: Associations with relationship outcome variables. Family Process, 48, 531–545. doi:10.1037/t03447-000
9.
ButlerE. A.LeeT. L.GrossJ. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific?Emotion, 7, 30–48. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30
10.
CaoH.FangX.FineM. A.JuX.LanJ.LiuX. (2015). Beyond the average marital communication: Latent profiles of the observed interactions among Chinese newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 850–862. doi:10.1037/fam0000126
11.
ChristensenA.EldridgeK.Catta-PretaA.LimV. R.SantagataR. (2006). Cross-cultural consistency of the demand/withdraw interaction pattern in couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1029–1044. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00311.x
12.
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
CongerR. D.RueterM. A.ElderG. H.,Jr. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54–71. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.54
14.
CopelandW.ShanahanL.CostelloE. J.AngoldA. (2009). Configurations of common childhood psychosocial risk factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 451–459. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02005.x
15.
CulpL. N.BeachS. R. H. (1998). Marriage and depressive symptoms: The role and bases of self-esteem differ by gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 647–663. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00183.x
16.
DennisonR. P.KoernerS. S.SegrinC. (2014). A dyadic examination of family-of-origin influence on newlyweds’ marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 429–435. doi:10.1037/a0036807
17.
DriverJ.TabaresA.ShapiroA. F.GottmanJ. M. (2012). Couple interaction in happy and unhappy marriages: Gottman Laboratory studies. In WalshF. (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (pp. 57–77). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
DuR. S.PappL. M.CummingsE. M. (2004). Relations of husbands’ and wives’ dysphoria to marital conflict resolution strategies. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 171–183. doi:10.1037/t01210-000
19.
DuncanT. E.DuncanS. C.StryckerL. A. (2013). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
DurtschiJ. A. (2011). Trajectories of marital quality and behavior across the transition to parenthood (Master’s thesis). Available from PsycINFO. (AAI3477220)
21.
FinchamF. D. (2004). Communication in marriage. In VangelistiA. L. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 83–103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H.DavilaJ. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 72–81. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.72
23.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H.DavilaJ. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 542–545. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.542
24.
FinchamF. D.BradburyT. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49, 797–809. doi:10.2307/351973
25.
FitzpatrickM. (1988). A typological approach to marital interaction. In NollerP.FitzpatrickM. (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 98–120). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual.
26.
FitzpatrickM. A.VangelistiA. L.FirmanS. M. (1994). Perceptions of marital interaction and change during pregnancy: A typological approach. Personal Relationships, 1, 101–122. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00057.x
27.
GottmanJ. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6–15. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.6
28.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221
30.
GottmanJ. M.NotariusC. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 927–947. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.x
31.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
32.
HoutsR. M.Barnett-WalkerK.PaleyB.CoxM. J. (2008). Patterns of couple interaction during the transition to parenthood. Personal Relationships, 15, 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00187.x
33.
HustonT. L. (1994). Courtship antecedents of marital satisfaction and love. In ErberR.GilmoreR. (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 43–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
34.
HustonT. L. (2009). What’s love got to do with it? Why some marriages succeed and others fail. Personal Relationships, 16, 301–327. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01225.x
35.
HustonT. L.CaughlinJ. P.HoutsR. M.SmithS. E.GeorgeL. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237
36.
Jobe-ShieldsL.AndrewsA. R.ParraG. R.WilliamsN. A. (2015). Person-centered approaches to understanding early family risk. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 432–451. doi:10.1111/jftr.12118
37.
JohnsonM. D.CohanC. L.DavilaJ.LawrenceE.RoggeR. D.KarneyB. R.…BradburyT. N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 15–27. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.15
38.
JoseA.LearyK. D.MoyerA. (2010). Does premarital cohabitation predict subsequent marital stability and marital quality? A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 105–116. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00686.x
39.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
40.
KerigP. K. (1996). Assessing the links between inter-parental conflict and child adjustment: The conflicts and problem-solving scales. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 454–473. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.4.454
41.
KerigP. K. (1998). Gender and appraisals as mediators of adjustment in children exposed to interparental violence. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 345–363. doi:10.1023/A:1022871102437
42.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
43.
KurdekL. A. (1994). Areas of conflict for gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples: What couples argue about influences relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 923–934. doi:10.2307/35360
44.
LanzaS. T.FlahertyB. P.CollinsL. M. (2003). Latent class and latent transition analysis. In SchinkaJ. A.VelicerW. F. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (pp. 663–685). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
45.
LanzaS. T.PatrickM. E.MaggsJ. L. (2010). Latent transition analysis: benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in substance use. Journal of Drug Issues, 40, 93–120. doi:10.1007/s00406-013-0475-3
46.
LarsonJ. H.HolmanT. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228–237. doi:10.2307/585327
47.
LavnerJ. A.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication?Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 680–694. doi:10.1111/jomf.12301
48.
LeeW.NakamuraS.ChungM.ChunY.FuM.LiangS.LiuC. (2013). Asian couples in negotiation: A mixed-method observational study of cultural variations across five Asian regions. Family Process, 52, 499–518. doi:10.1111/famp.12040
49.
LiY.CheungR. Y. M.CummingsE. M. (2016). Marital conflict and emotional insecurity among Chinese adolescents: Cultural value moderation. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 316–333. doi:10.1111/jora.12193
50.
LiY.PutallazM.SuY. (2011). Interparental conflict styles and parenting behaviors: Associations with overt and relational aggression among Chinese children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57, 402–428. doi:10.1353/mpq.2011.0017
51.
MahoneyA.PargamentK. I.JewellT.SwankA. B.ScottE.EmeryE.RyeM. (1999). Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 321–338. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.3.321
52.
MarkmanH. J.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.RaganE. P.WhittonS. W. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 289–298. doi:10.1037/a0019481
53.
MatsumotoD.YooS.FontaineJ.Anguas-WongA.ArriolaM.AtacaB.…GrossiE. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 55–74. doi:10.1177/0022022107311854
NiehuisS.LeeK. H.ReifmanA.SwensonA.HunsakerS. (2011). Idealization and disillusionment in intimate relationships: A review of theory, method, and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 273–302. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00100.x
56.
NiehuisS.ReifmanA.FengD.HustonT. L. (2016). Courtship progression rate and declines in expressed affection early in marriage: A test of the disillusionment model. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 1074–1100. doi:10.1177/0192513X14540159
57.
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 141–151. doi:10.2307/351302
58.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D.McNultyJ. K.FinkelE. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217. doi:10.1037/pspi0000059
59.
PimentelE. E. (2000). Just how do I love thee? Marital relations in urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 32–47. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00032.x
60.
RidleyC. A.FeldmanC. M. (2003). Female domestic violence toward male partners: Exploring conflict responses and outcomes. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 157–170. doi:10.1023/A:1023516521612
61.
RidleyC. A.WilhelmM. S.SurraC. A. (2001). Married couples’ conflict responses and marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 517–534. doi:10.1177/0265407501184005
62.
RodgersR. H.WhiteJ. M. (1993). Family development theory. In BossP. G.DohertyW. J.LaRossaR.SchummW. R.SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 225–257). New York, NY: Plenum.
63.
SagrestanoL. M.HeaveyC. L.ChristensenA. (2006). Individual differences versus social structural approaches to explaining demand-withdraw and social influence behaviors. In DindiaK.CanaryD. J. (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 379–395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
64.
ScheerenP.VieiraR. V. D. A.GoulartV. R.WagnerA. (2014). Marital quality and attachment: The mediator role of conflict resolution styles. Paideía, 24, 177–186. doi:10.1590/1982-43272458201405
65.
SchneewindK. A.GerhardA.-K. (2002). Relationship personality, conflict resolution, and marital satisfaction in the first 5 years of marriage. Family Relations, 51, 63–71. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00063.x
66.
SchummW. R.Paff-BergenL.HatchR. C.ObiorahF. C.CopelandJ. M.MeensL. D.BugaighisM. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas marital satisfaction scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 381–387. doi:10.2307/352405
67.
SmithD. A.VivianD.O’LearyK. D. (1990). Longitudinal prediction of marital discord from premarital expressions of affect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 790–798. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.58.6.790
68.
StoraasliR. D.MarkmanH. J. (1990). Relationship problems in the early stages of marriage: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 80–98. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.4.1.80
69.
StolarskiM.PostekS.SmiejaM. (2011). Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution strategies in romantic heterosexual couples. Studia Psychologiczne, 49, 65–76. doi:10.2478/v10167-010-0041-9
70.
ToddN. R.HoustonJ. D. (2013). Examining patterns of political, social service, and collaborative involvement of religious congregations: A latent class and transition analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 442–438. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9561-3
71.
UmbersonD.WilliamsK.PowersD. A.ChenM. D.CampbellA. M. (2005). As good as it gets? A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 493–511. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0131
72.
WhiteJ. M.KleinD. M. (2008). Family Theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
73.
WilliamsonH. C.JuX.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R.FangX.LiuX. (2012). Communication behavior and relationship satisfaction among American and Chinese newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 308–315. doi:10.1037/a0027752
74.
WoodinE. M. (2011). A two-dimensional approach to relationship conflict: Meta-analytic findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 325–335. doi:10.1037/a0023791
75.
XuY.BurlesonB. R. (2004). The association of experienced spousal support with marital satisfaction: Evaluating the moderating effects of sex, ethnic culture, and type of support. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 123–145. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0402_3
76.
ZacchilliT. L.HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (2009). The romantic partner conflict scale: A new scale to measure relationship conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1073–1096. doi:10.1177/0265407509347936
77.
ZhangJ.SmithS.SwisherM.FuD.FogartyK. (2011). Gender role disruption and marital satisfaction among wives of Chinese international students in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42, 523–542. doi:10.1037/t01038-000
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
