Using the correlated trait and correlated method minus one model (CT-C(M-1)), this study separated trait effects and trait method-specific effects of attachment figure-domain units in the IPPA-R. The model fit of the proposed model was examined and compared with those of other alternative models using a sample of 1290 adolescents from China. Results indicated that models specifying attachment domains across relationships as methods fitted data better than models specifying attachment domains across relationships as traits in the CT-C(M-1) model. In addition, the factor representing attachment-with-mother was found to significantly predict anxiety, stress, and social efficacy, whereas the attachment-with-father factor was a significant predictor of social self-efficacy, both of which supported the differential functioning of mother and father. Results suggest that the CT-C(M-1) model is a promising approach to separate the unique contributions of different attachment figures and relationship attachment domain-specific effect measured by IPPA-R.
AllenJ. P.PorterM.McfarlandC.McelhaneyK. B.MarshP. (2007). The Relation of Attachment Security to Adolescents? Paternal and Peer Relationships, Depression, and Externalizing Behavior. Child Development, 78(4), 1222–1239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01062.x
2.
ArmsdenG. C.GreenbergM. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427–454. DOI: 10.1007/BF02202939
3.
ArmsdenG. C.GreenbergM. T. (1989). The inventory of parent and peer attachment (IPPA), Washington, WA, USA: University of Washington.
4.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB.MuthénB. O. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Matrix, 1(5), 1–6.
5.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I attachment. London: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
6.
BrethertonI. (2010). Fathers in attachment theory and research: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 180(1–2), 9–23. DOI: 10.1080/03004430903414661
7.
BureauJ.-F.MartinJ.YurkowskiK.SchmiedelS.QuanJ.MossE.PallancaD. (2017). Correlates of child–father and child–mother attachment in the preschool years. Attachment & Human Development, 19(2), 130–150. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2016.1263350
8.
CabreraN. J.VollingB. L.BarrR. (2018). Fathers are parents, too! widening the lens on parenting for children’s development. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 152–157. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12275
9.
CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds). (2016). Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (3rd ed.). New York, US: The Guilford Press.
10.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. DOI: 10.1080/10705510701301834
11.
CollinsN. L.ReadS. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In Attachment processes in adulthood. (pp. 53–90). London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
12.
DaganO.Sagi-SchwartzA. (2018). Early attachment network with mother and father: an unsettled issue. Child Development Perspectives, 12(2), 115–121. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12272
13.
De WolffM. S.van IjzendoornM. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68(4), 571–591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04218.x
14.
EidM. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, (2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294377.
15.
EidM.LischetzkeT.NussbeckF. W.TrierweilerL. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C (M-1) model. PsychologicalMethods, 8(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.38.
16.
EidM.GeiserC.KochT.HeeneM. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541-562. DOI: 10.1037/met0000083
17.
FanJ.MengH.GaoX.LopezF. J.LiuC. (2010). Validation of a U.S. adult social self-efficacy inventory in Chinese populations. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(4), 473–496. DOI: 10.1177/0011000009352514
18.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2004). Interpersonal safe haven and secure base caregiving processes in adulthood. In RholesW. S.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 300–338). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Publications.
19.
FraleyR. C.HeffernanM. E.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625. DOI: 10.1037/a0022898
20.
FreemanH.BrownB. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(6), 653–674. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012200511045
21.
GirmeY. U.AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E.HarveyS. M.RholesW. S.SimpsonJ. A. (2018). The ebbs and flows of attachment: Within-person variation in attachment undermine secure individuals’ relationship wellbeing across time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(3), 397–421. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000115
22.
GrossmannK.GrossmannK. E. (2019). Essentials when studying child-father attachment: A fundamental view on safe haven and secure base phenomena. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1589056
23.
GulloneE.RobinsonK. (2005). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment-Revised (IPPA-R) for children: a psychometric investigation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12(1), 67–79. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.433
24.
HanX.JiangB.TangJ.WangY. (2005). Zizun liangbiao shiyong guocheng zhong de wenti ji jianyi [Problems and suggestions for using Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale]. Zhongguo Xingwei Yixue Kexue, 8, 763.
25.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.3.511
26.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
KeizerR.HelmerhorstK. O. W.van Rijn-van GelderenL. (2019). Perceived quality of the mother–adolescent and father–adolescent attachment relationship and adolescents’ self-esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(6), 1203–1217. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-019-01007-0
28.
KernsK. A.MathewsB. L.KoehnA. J.WilliamsC. T.Siener-CieslaS. (2015). Assessing both safe haven and secure base support in parent–child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 17(4), 337–353. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2015.1042487
29.
KlohnenE. C.WellerJ. A.LuoS.ChoeM. (2005). Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: One for all, and all for one?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1665–1682. DOI: 10.1177/0146167205278307
30.
KuoP. X.SainiE. K.TengelitschE.VollingB. L. (2019). Is one secure attachment enough? Infant cortisol reactivity and the security of infant-mother and infant-father attachments at the end of the first year. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1582595
31.
LaibleD. (2007). Attachment with parents and peers in late adolescence: Links with emotional competence and social behavior. Personality & Individual Differences, 43(5), 1185–1197. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.010
32.
LinhanL.ZhijingH.LuT. (2006). Beijing shi qingshao nian dui fuqing muqing ji tongban de yilian jiqi guanxi [The comparison of attachment to mother, father and peer for adolescents in Beijing]. Zhonggguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi, 10, 639–642. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2006.10.002
33.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide.(Eighth Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
34.
OldfieldJ.HumphreyN.HebronJ. (2016). The role of parental and peer attachment relationships and school connectedness in predicting adolescent mental health outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 21(1), 21–29. DOI: 10.1111/camh.12108
35.
PendergastL. L.von der EmbseN.KilgusS. P.EklundK. R. (2017). Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 60, 65–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002
36.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.MarshH. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167–180. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
38.
ShererM.MadduxJ. E.MercandanteB.Prentice-DunnS.JacobsB.RogersR. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
39.
SunY. (2004). Qingshao nian yifu pingzhi qingxu zhili yu shiying zhi guanxi [The adolescents’ attachment, emotional intelligence and school adaption] [unpublished master thesis]. National Sun Yat-sen University.
40.
SunQ.WangC.JiangG.-R. (2017). Culture-based emotional working models of attachment, Western-based attachment, and psychosocial functioning of Chinese young adults. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 6(4), 195–208. DOI: 10.1037/ipp0000075
41.
SvetinaD.RutkowskiL.RutkowskiD. (2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: an illustration using M plus and the lavaan/semtools packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111–130. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
42.
WangC. D.HayslipB.SunQ.ZhuW. (2019). Grandparents as the primary care providers for their gradchildren: A cross-cultural comparison of China and US samples. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 89(4), 331-355. DOI: 10.1177/0091415018824722
43.
WangC. D.MallinckrodtB. (2006). Acculturation, attachment, and psychosocial adjustment of Chinese/Taiwanese international students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 422–433. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.422
44.
WangK.ShiH.-S.GengF.-L.ZouL.-Q.TanS.-P.WangY.ChanR. C. K. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 in China. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), e88–e100. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000207
45.
WuH.EstabrookR. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
