Residential mobility has received considerable research attention in recent years because of its influences on many aspects of our cognitive behaviors. However, little research has been conducted to explore how residential mobility affects generalized trust. The current study was conducted to fill this gap. From individual and societal level, Studies 1a, 1b and 1c employing survey questionnaires consistently documented a negative relationship between personal history of residential moves and generalized trust (trust in strangers), but there was no association between mobility and particularistic trust (trust in known others). Study 2 found that mobility priming significantly reduced perceived trustworthiness to strangers (Study 2a) and that less money was invested to strangers when participants were primed with mobility than when primed with stability in a trust game (Study 2b). Study 3 observed that individuals who planned to move dormitories in the near future, by comparison with those not planning to move, invested less money to strangers in a trust game. In addition, the current study also found that the association between mobility and generalized trust was mediated by perceived uncertainty evoked by mobility (in Study 2b & Study 3). Theoretical implications for the mechanisms underlying the mobility effect on generalized trust are discussed.
AdamE. K. (2004). Beyond quality: Parental and residential stability and children’s adjustment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(5), 210–213.
2.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
3.
BaileyP. E.SlessorG.RiegerM.RendellP. G.MoustafaA. A.RuffmanT. (2015). Trust and trustworthiness in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 977–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039736
4.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
5.
CaoJ.GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W. (2014). Does travel broaden the mind? Breadth of foreign experiences increases generalized trust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613514456
6.
CastleE.EisenbergerN. I.SeemanT. E.MoonsW. G.BoggeroI. A.GrinblattM. S.TaylorS. E. (2012). Neural and behavioral bases of age differences in perceptions of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(51), 20848–20852. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218518109
ColeyR. L.KullM. (2016). Cumulative, timing-specific, and interactive models of residential mobility and children’s cognitive and psychosocial skills. Child Development, 87(4), 1204–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12535
11.
CurranP. J.WestS. G.FinchJ. F. (1996). The Robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
EvansA. M.KruegerJ. I. (2014). Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(2), 90–103.
15.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks.
16.
GächterS.SchulzJ. F. (2016). Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies. Nature, 531(7595), 496–499. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17160
17.
GeE.ChenY.WuJ.MaceR. (2019). Large-scale cooperation driven by reputation, not fear of divine punishment. Royal Society Open Science, 6(8), 190991. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190991
18.
GelfandM. J.ChiuC.HongY. (2015). Handbook of advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 5). Oxford University Press.
19.
GeorgasJ.van de VijverF. J. R.BerryJ. W. (2004). The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indices, and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260459
20.
GoodmanE.AdlerN. E.KawachiI.FrazierA. L.HuangB.ColditzG. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), e31–e31. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.e31
21.
HamamuraT. (2012). Social class predicts generalized trust but only in wealthy societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111399649
22.
International Organization for Migration. (2015). World migration report 2015. Migrants and cities: New partnerships to manage mobility. International Organization for Migration Geneva.
23.
KopfE. (1977). Untarnishing the dream: Mobility, opportunity, and order in modern America. Journal of Social History, 11(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh/11.2.206
LiT.FungH. H. (2013). Age differences in trust: An investigation across 38 countries. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 68(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs072
26.
LiW.-Q.LiL. M. W.LiM. (2019). Residential mobility reduces ingroup favouritism in prosocial behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12338
27.
LountR. B.PettitN. C. (2012). The social context of trust: The role of status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005
28.
LunJ.OishiS.TenneyE. R. (2012). Residential mobility moderates preferences for egalitarian versus loyal helpers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.002
29.
MetzgerM. W.FowlerP. J.AndersonC. L.LindsayC. A. (2015). Residential mobility during adolescence: Do even “upward” moves predict dropout risk?Social Science Research, 53, 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.004
30.
OishiS. (2010). The Psychology of Residential Mobility: Implications for the Self, Social Relationships, and Well-Being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356781
31.
OishiS.KesebirS.MiaoF. F.TalhelmT.EndoY.UchidaY.ShibanaiY.NorasakkunkitV. (2013). Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network: But why?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.008
32.
OishiS.LunJ.ShermanG. D. (2007a). Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.131
33.
OishiS.MiaoF. F.KooM.KislingJ.RatliffK. A. (2012). Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024949
34.
OishiS.RothmanA. J.SnyderM.SuJ.ZehmK.HertelA. W.GonzalesM. H.ShermanG. D. (2007b). The socioecological model of procommunity action: The benefits of residential stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.831
35.
OishiS.SchimmackU. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019389
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
38.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
39.
RevelleW. (2020). PSYCH: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (1.9.12.31)[Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
RotterJ. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464
42.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
43.
RozinP.KabnickK.PeteE.FischlerC.ShieldsC. (2003). The ecology of eating: Smaller portion sizes in France than in the United States help explain the French paradox. Psychological Science, 14(5), 450–454.
44.
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786
45.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
46.
SnijdersC.KerenG. (1999). Determinants of trust. In BudescuD.V.ErevI.ZwickR. (Eds.), Games and human behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 355–385). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
47.
StolleD. (1998). Bowling together, bowling alone: The development of generalized trust in voluntary associations. Political Psychology, 497–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/3792175
48.
ThomsonR.YukiM.TalhelmT.SchugJ.KitoM.AyanianA. H.BeckerJ. C.BeckerM.ChiuC.ChoiH.-S. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115
49.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.
50.
Van LangeP. A. M.RockenbachB.YamagishiT. (2017). Trust in social dilemmas. Oxford University Press.
51.
VernbergE. M.GreenhootA. F.BiggsB. K. (2006). Intercommunity relocation and adolescent friendships: Who struggles and why?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.511
WuJ.BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2016). Reputation, gossip, and human cooperation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(6), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12255
YamagishiT.CookK. S.WatabeM. (1998). Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/210005
56.
YamagishiT.YamagishiM. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397
57.
YuM.WuX.HuangL.LuoS. (2020). Residential mobility mindset enhances temporal discounting in the loss framework. Physiology & Behavior, 225, 113107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113107
58.
YukiM.SchugJ. (2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In GillathO.AdamsG.KunkelA. (Eds.), Relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 137–151). American Psychological Association. http://content.apa.org/books/13489-007
59.
YukiM.SchugJ.HorikawaH.TakemuraK.SatoK.YokotaK.KamayaK. (2007). Development of a scale to measure perceptions of relational mobility in society. Working Paper, Hokkaido University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
