When people end their relationships, they must choose which parts of the relationship to remember and forget as they prepare themselves for future partners. This memory process is complicated by the recordability and permanence of mediated messages because individuals must actively curate their virtual possessions—such as pictures with a previous partner or online relationship statuses. Using the relational dissolution model framework, this study investigated the behaviors people use online to manage the end of their relationships and how these choices may influence the way they adjust to the breakup. College students (N = 234) were surveyed to examine how their keeping and deleting of virtual possessions are related to their post-breakup adjustment. Results suggest that keeping virtual possessions negatively relates to post-breakup adjustment. Participants who were more nostalgic were more likely to keep virtual possessions following a breakup, which mediated the relationship between nostalgia and post-breakup adjustment. The implications show how the persistence of mediated possessions has the potential to affect the breakup process as people struggle to manage their relational memories.
AbeytaA. A.NelsonT. A.RoutledgeC. (2019). The pushes and pulls of the past: The effects of attachment-related avoidance and nostalgia on approach-oriented social goals. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.008
2.
AbeytaA. A.RoutledgeC.JuhlJ. (2015). Looking back to move forward: Nostalgia as a psychological resource for promoting relationship goals and overcoming relationship challenges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000036
BlackburnK.LeFebvreL.BrodyN. (2018). Breakup memory curation: Exploring the management of virtual relics post-dissolution. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association Convention.
5.
BrodyN.LeFebvreL.BlackburnK. (2016). Social networking site behaviors across the relational lifespan: Measurement and association with relationship escalation and de-escalation. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116680004
6.
CumiskeyK. M.HjorthL. (2017). Haunting hands: Mobile media practices and loss. Oxford University Press.
7.
del Palacio-GonzálezA.ClarkD. A.O'SullivanL. F. (2017). Cognitive processing in the aftermath of relationship dissolution: Associations with concurrent and prospective distress and posttraumatic growth. Stress and Health, 33, 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2738
8.
DuckS. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In DuckS. (Ed.), Personal relationships: Dissolving personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 1–30). Academic Press.
9.
FoxJ.OsbornJ. L.WarberK. M. (2014). Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of Facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.031
10.
FoxJ.WarberK. M.MakstallerD. C. (2013). The role of Facebook in romantic relationship development: An exploration of Knapp’s relational stage model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 771–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512468370
11.
FramptonJ. R.FoxJ. (2018). Social media’s role in romantic partners’ retroactive jealousy: Social comparison, uncertainty, and information seeking. Social Media and Society, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118800317
12.
GudmundsdottirG. (2014). The online self: Memory and forgetting in the digital age. European Journal of Life Writing, 3, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.5463/ejlw.3.100
13.
HerronD.MoncurW.van den HovenE. (2017). Digital decoupling and disentangling: Towards design for romantic break up. In Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 1175–1185). https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064765
14.
HollisV.KonradA.SpringerA.AntounM.AntounC.MartinR.WhittakerS. (2017). What does all this data mean for my future mood? Actionable analytics and targeted reflection for emotional well-being. Human–Computer Interaction, 32, 208–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1277724
15.
HumphreysL. (2018). The Qualified self: Social media and the accounting of everyday life. MIT Press.
16.
IyerA.JettenJ. (2011). What’s left behind: Identity continuity moderates the effect of nostalgia on well-being and life choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022496
17.
Johnson-LairdP. N.OatleyK. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 81–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908408075
18.
Koenig KellasJ.BeanD.CunninghamC.ChengK. Y. (2008). The ex-files: Trajectories, turning points, and adjustment in the development of post-dissolutional relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507086804
19.
KonradA.IsaacsE.WhittakerJ. (2016). Technology mediated memory: Is technology altering our memories and interfering with well-being?ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 23, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2934667
20.
KuhnA. (2000). A journey through memory. In RadstoneS. (Ed.), Memory and methodology (pp. 179–196). Berg.
21.
LeFebvreL. E.HaggadoneB. (2018). Remembering the voice: Exploring information and sentiment in voicemail archival practices. Mobile Media and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918804844
22.
LeFebvreL.BlackburnK.BrodyN. (2015). Navigating romantic relationships on Facebook: Extending the relational dissolution model to account for social networking environments. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 32, 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514524848
23.
MitchellT. R.ThompsonL.PetersonE.CronkR. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1333
24.
MoncurW.GibsonL.HerronD. (2016, February). The role of digital technologies during relationship breakdowns. In Proceedings of the computer supported cooperative work conference (pp. 371–382). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819925
25.
PereiraA. G.Vesnic-AlujevicL.GhezziA. (2014). The ethics of memory in a digital age: Interrogating the right to be forgotten. In GhazziA.PereiraA. G.Vesnic-AlujevicL. (Eds.), The ethics of forgetting and remembering in the digital world through the eye of the media (pp. 9–27). Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
27.
RicoeurP. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting (BlameyK.PellauerD., Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
28.
RollieS. S.DuckS. W. (2006). Divorce and dissolution of romantic relationships: Stage models and their limitations. In FineM. A.HarveyJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (pp. 223–240). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
RoutledgeC.WildschutT.SedikidesC.JuhlJ.ArndtJ. (2012). The power of the past: Nostalgia as a meaning-making resource. Memory, 20, 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.677452
30.
SaffreyC.EhrenbergM. (2007). When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and post-relationship adjustment. Personal Relationships, 14, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00160.x
31.
SasC.WhittakerS. (2013, April). Design for forgetting: Disposing of digital possessions after a breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1823–1832). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466241
32.
SasC.WhittakerS.ZimmermanJ. (2016). Design for rituals of letting go: An embodiment perspective on disposal practices informed by grief therapy. ACM Trans Computer-Human Interaction, 23, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2926714
33.
SedgewickJ. R.FlathM. E.EliasL. J. (2017). Presenting your best self (ie): The influence of gender on vertical orientation of selfies on tinder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604
34.
SedikidesC.WildschutT.ArndtJ.RoutledgeC. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 304–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00595.x
35.
TomaC. L.HancockJ. T.EllisonN. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318067
36.
TreynorW.GonzalezR.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561
WalkerW. R.SkowronskiJ. J. (2013). Autobiographical memory and the creation of meaning from personally experienced events. In KeithD.MarkmanT. P.MatthewJ. L. (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 149–170). American Psychological Association.
39.
WalkerW. R.SkowronskiJ. J.GibbonsJ. A.VoglR. J.RitchieT. D. (2009). Why people rehearse their memories: Frequency of use and relations to the intensity of emotions associated with autobiographical memories. Memory, 17, 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903107846
40.
WaltherJ. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
41.
WildschutT.SedikidesCArndtJ.RoutledgeC. D. (2006). Nostalgia: Content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 304–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975
