The reported study examined the implications of receiving superficial self-disclosures from a friend. A total of 199 adults reported on communication episodes initiated by a friend during the previous 7 days via five communication technologies and completed measures of liking, relationship satisfaction, and willingness to provide social support to their friend. The results revealed significant interactions between the total volume of self-disclosures received and proportion of superficial disclosures for liking and relationship satisfaction. Among respondents who received a relatively greater volume of self-disclosures, the proportion of superficial disclosures received was inversely associated with relationship satisfaction and liking. Perceived costs mediated the preceding relationships.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, UK: Sage.
2.
AltmanI.TaylorD. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3.
BazarovaN. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62, 815–832. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x
4.
BergerC.CalabreseR. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
5.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CollinsN. L.MillerL. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
7.
CozbyP. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 73–91.
DerlegaV. J.ChaikinA. L. (1975). Sharing intimacy: What we reveal to others and why. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hill.
10.
DerlegaV. J.MettsS.PetronioS.MargulisS. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
DindiaK. (1997). Self-disclosure and self and relationship identity: A transactional/dialectical perspective. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 411–426). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12.
DindiaK.AllenM. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106
13.
FoynesM. M.FreydJ. J. (2013). An exploratory study evaluating responses to the disclosure of stressful life experiences as they occurred in real time. Psychological Trauma, 5, 295–300.
14.
GreeneK.DerlegaV. J.MathewsA. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In VangelistiA.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409–427). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HamptonK.GouletL. S.RainieL.PurcellK. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, and Society, 8, 125–147.
18.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 93–98.
19.
HomansG. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 597–606. doi:10.1086/222355
20.
JangC. Y.StefanoneM. A. (2011). Non-directed self-disclosure in the blogosphere. Information, Communication and Society, 14, 1039–1059.
21.
JoinsonA. N.HoughtonD. J.VasalouA.MarderB. L. (2011). Digital crowding: Privacy, self-disclosure and technology. In TrepteS.ReineckeL. (Eds.), Privacy online. Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 31–44). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
JoinsonA. N.PaineC. B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet. In JoinsonA. NMcKennaK. Y. APostmesT.ReipsU.-D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 237–252). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
JourardS. M. (1971). The transparent self. New York, NY: D. Van Nostrand.
24.
KatzJ.AakhusM. (2002). Making meaning of mobiles: A theory of Apparatgeist. In KatzJ.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 301–320). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KimJ.DindiaK. (2011). Online self-disclosure: A review of research. In WrightK. B.WebbL. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 156–180). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
26.
LeeC. K. M. (2011). Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices. In ThurlowC.MroczekK. (Eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media (pp. 110–128). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
LedbetterA. M. (2009). Patterns of media use and multiplexity: Associations with sex, geographic distance and friendship interdependence. New Media & Society, 11, 1187–1208.
28.
MeeksB. S.HendrickS. S.HendrickC. (1998). Communication, love, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142. doi:10.1177/0265407598156003
29.
MillerV. (2008). New media, networking, and phatic culture. Convergence, 14, 387–400.
30.
OulasvirtaA.LehtonenE.KurvinenE.RaentoR. (2010). Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 237–249. doi:10.1007/s00779-009-0259-y
31.
PetronioS. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
32.
PettigrewJ. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 697–716.
33.
PurcellK. (2011). Half of adult cell phone owners have apps on their phones. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org
34.
RadovanovicD.RagneddaM. (2012). Small talk in the digital age: Making sense of phatic posts. In RoweM.StankovicM.DadzieA.-S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the WWW’12 Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts (Vol. 838, pp. 10–13). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
35.
RettieR. (2009). SMS: Exploiting the interactional characteristics of near-synchrony. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 1131–1148. doi:10.1080/13691180902786943
36.
RoloffM. E. (1981). Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
RubinZ. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273. doi:10.1037/h0029841
38.
RuppelE. K. (in press). Use of communication technologies in romantic relationships: Self-disclosure and the role of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi:10.1177/0265407514541075
39.
SherbourneC. D.StewartA. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32, 705–714. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
40.
SmithA. (2011). Americans and text messaging. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org
41.
SprecherS.HedrickS. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.
42.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
43.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: John Wiley.
44.
TongS. T.WaltherJ. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and computer-mediated communication. In WrightK. B.WebbL. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118) New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
45.
TurkleS. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In KatzJ. E.CastellesM. (Eds.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 121–137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
VangelistiA. L.BanskiM. (1993). Couples’ debriefing conversations: The impact of gender, occupation, and demographic characteristics. Family Relations, 42, 149–157. doi:10.2307/585448
47.
WorthyM.GaryA. L.KahnG. M. (1969). Self-disclosure as an exchange process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 59–63. doi:10.1037/h0027990
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
