Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study used relational turbulence theory to examine (a) how the relational impact of miscarriage corresponded with bereaved mothers’ grief responses and (b) the association between a partner’s supportive conversational behaviors and relationship qualities. The sample included 193 women who had experienced a miscarriage within the previous year. As predicted, relational uncertainty was positively associated with women’s negative appraisals of miscarriage; facilitation from a partner was positively associated with women’s negative emotions; bereaved mothers’ negative appraisals and negative emotional responses covaried; and a partner’s supportive conversational behaviors were positively associated with facilitation from a partner. Contrary to our predictions, interference from a partner was not associated with more intense negative emotions, and a partner’s supportive conversational behaviors were positively associated with relational uncertainty and interference from a partner. The discussion highlights the relational impact of miscarriage on bereaved mothers’ experiences of grief.

Keywords

Grief miscarriage partner interdependence relational uncertainty supportive communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbound

L. N.

Liamputtong

(2003). Pregnancy loss: What it means to women who miscarry and their partners. Social Work in Health Care, 36, 37–62.

Altman

Taylor

(1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

American Pregnancy Association (2015). Miscarriage. http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancycomplications/miscarriage.html

Athey

Spielvogel

A. M.

(2000). Risk factors and interventions for psychological sequelae in women after miscarriage. Primary Care Update Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 64–69. https:/doi.org/10.1016/S1068-607X(00)00023-8

Barrett-Lennard

G. T.

(2015). The relationship inventory: A complete resource and guide. Wiley-Blackwell.

Berscheid

(1983). Emotion. In Kelley

H. H.

Berscheid

Christensen

Harvey

Huston

T. L.

Levinger

McClintock

Peplau

L. A.

Peterson

D. R.

(Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 110–168). Freeman.

Bodie

G. D.

(2011). The active-empathic listening scale (AELS): Conceptualization and evidence of validity within the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, 59, 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.583495

Bodie

G. D.

Vickery

A. J.

Cannava

Jones

S. M.

(2015). The role of “active listening” in informal helping conversations: Impact on perceptions of listener helpfulness, sensitivity, and supportiveness and discloser emotional improvement. Western Journal of Communication, 79, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.943429

Bolger

Amarel

(2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458

10.

Brier

(2008). Grief following miscarriage: A comprehensive review of the literature. Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0505

11.

Brisini

Solomon

D. H.

(2019). Relational turbulence and marital communication when children with autism start school: A longitudinal dyadic diary study. Health Communication. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1567445

12.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

13.

Burleson

B. R.

Goldsmith

D. J.

(1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In Andersen

P. A.

Guerrero

L. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 245– 280). Academic Press.

14.

Bute

J. J.

Brann

(2015). Co-ownership of private information in the miscarriage context. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.982686

15.

Bute

J. J.

Brann

Hernandez

(2019). Exploring societal-level privacy rule for talking about miscarriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517731828

16.

Chalmers

Meyer

(1992). A cross-cultural view of the psychosocial management of miscarriage. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 13, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674829209019573

17.

Conway

Russell

(2000). Couples’ grief and experience of support in the aftermath of miscarriage. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711200160714

18.

Dillard

J. P.

Kinney

T. A.

Cruz

M. G.

(1996). Influence, appraisals, and emotions in close relationships. Communication Monographs, 63, 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376382

19.

Dyregrov

(2008). What types of support do the bereaved encounter and what do they want? In Dyregrov

Dyregrov

(Eds.), Effective grief and bereavement support: The role of family, friends, colleagues, schools and support professionals (pp. 50–69). Jessica Kingsley.

20.

Elliott

James

Reimschuessel

Cislo

Sack

(1985). Significant events and the analysis of immediate therapeutic impacts. Psychotherapy, 22, 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085548

21.

Feng

(2009). Testing an integrated model of advice giving in supportive interactions. Human Communication Research, 35, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01340.x

22.

Fowler

Afifi

W. A.

(2011). Applying the theory of motivated information management to adult children’s discussions of caregiving with aging parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510384896

23.

Frost

Bradley

Levitas

Smith

Garcia

(2007). The loss of possibility: Scientisation of death and the special case of early miscarriage. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 1003–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01019.x

24.

Goldsmith

(1992). Managing conflicting goals in supportive interaction: An integrative theoretical framework. Communication Research, 19, 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002007

25.

Goldsmith

(1994). The role of facework in supportive communication. In Burleson

B. R.

Albrecht

T. L.

Sarason

I. G.

(Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 29–49). Sage.

26.

Goldsmith

(2004). Communicating social support. Cambridge University Press.

27.

High

A. C.

Steuber

K. R.

(2014). An examination of support (in)adequacy: Types, sources, and consequences of social support among infertile women. Communication Monographs, 30, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.878868

28.

Hill

C. R.

Kellems

I. S.

(2002). Development and use of the helping skills measure to assess client perceptions of the effects of training and of helping skills in sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.2.264

29.

Holman

Horstman

H. K.

(2019). Similarities and dissimilarities in spouses’ narratives of miscarriage: A dyadic analysis of communicated narrative sense-making and well-being. Journal of Family Communication. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1628763

30.

Horstman

H. K.

Holman

(2018). Communicated sense-making after miscarriage: A dyadic analysis of spousal communicated perspective-taking, well-being, and parenting role salience. Health Communication, 33, 1317–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1351852

31.

Horstman

H. K.

Holman

McBride

M. C.

(2019). Men’s use of metaphors to make sense of their spouse’s miscarriage: Expanding the communicated sense-making model. Health Communication. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1570430

32.

Huffman

C. S.

Swanson

Lynn

M. R.

(2014). Measuring the meaning of miscarriage: Revision of the impact of miscarriage scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 22, 29–45.

33.

Jones

S. M.

Bodie

G. D.

(2014). Supportive communication. In Berger

C. R.

(Ed.), Interpersonal communication (pp. 371–394). De Gruyter Mouton.

34.

Jones

S. M.

Wirtz

(2006). How does the comforting process work? An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Human Communication Research, 32, 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00274.x

35.

Kellas

J. K.

Trees

A. R.

(2006). Finding meaning in difficult family experiences: Sense-making and interaction processes during joint family storytelling. The Journal of Family Communication, 6, 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0601_4

36.

Kline

R. B.

(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . The Guilford Press.

37.

Knobloch

L. K.

Ebata

A. T.

McGlaughlin

P. C.

Ogolsky

(2013). Depressive symptoms, relational turbulence, and the reintegration difficulty of military couples following wartime deployment. Health Communication, 28, 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.800440

38.

Knobloch

L. K.

Miller

L. E.

Carpenter

K. E.

(2007). Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship. Personal Relationships, 14, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00143.x

39.

Knobloch

L. K.

Sharabi

L. L.

Delaney

A. L.

Suranne

S. M.

(2016). The role of relational uncertainty in topic avoidance among couples with depression. Communication Monographs, 83, 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.998691

40.

Knobloch

L. K.

Solomon

D. H.

(1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499

41.

Knobloch

L. K.

Solomon

D. H.

(2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00806.x

42.

Knobloch

L. K.

Solomon

D. H.

(2004). Interference and facilitation from partners in the development of interdependence within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 11, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00074.x

43.

Lazarus

R. S.

Folkman

(1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

44.

McGreal

Evans

Burrows

(1997). Gender differences in coping following loss of a child through miscarriage or stillbirth: A pilot study. Stress Medicine, 13, 159–165.

45.

Miller

L. C.

Berg

J. H.

Archer

R. L.

(1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037=0022-3514.44.6.1234

46.

Mukherjee

Edwards

Baird

D. D.

Savitz

D. A.

Hartmann

K. E.

(2013). Risk of miscarriage among Black women and White women in a US prospective cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177, 1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws393

47.

Norton

(1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/351302

48.

Pauley

P. M.

Floyd

Hesse

(2015). The stress-buffering effects of a brief dyadic interaction before an acute stressor. Health Communication, 30, 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.888385

49.

Rogers

C. R.

(2007). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.44.3.240

50.

Salakari

Kaunonen

Aho

A. L.

(2014). Negative changes in a couple’s relationship after a child’s death. Interpersona, 8, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.166

51.

Simmons

R. K.

Singh

Maconochie

Doyle

Green

(2006). Experience of miscarriage in the UK: Qualitative findings from the national women’s health study. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1934–1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.024

52.

Solomon

D. H.

Brisini

(2017). Operationalizing relational turbulence theory: Measurement and construct validation. Personal Relationships, 24, 768–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12212

53.

Solomon

D. H.

Brisini

(2018). Relational uncertainty and interdependence processes in marriage: A test of relational turbulence theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518788700

54.

Solomon

D. H.

Knobloch

L. K.

(2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177=0265407504047838

55.

Solomon

D. H.

Knobloch

L. K.

Theiss

J. A.

McLaren

R. M.

(2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42, 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091

56.

Steuber

K. R.

Solomon

D. H.

(2008). Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 831–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096698

57.

Stroebe

Finkenauer

Meij

Schut

Van den Bout

Stroebe

(2013). Partner-oriented self-regulation among bereaved parents: The costs of holding in grief for the partner’s sake. Psychological Science, 24, 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457383

58.

Theiss

J. A.

Knobloch

L. K.

(2014). Relational turbulence and the post-deployment transition: Self, partner, and relationship focused turbulence. Communication Research, 4, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211429285

59.

Theiss

J. A.

Knobloch

L. K.

Checton

M. G.

Magsamen-Conrad

(2009). Relationship characteristics associated with the experience of hurt in romantic relationships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Human Communication Research, 35, 588–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01364.x

60.

Theiss

J. A.

Solomon

D. H.

(2006). Coupling longitudinal data and multilevel modeling to examine the antecedents and consequences of jealousy experiences in romantic relationships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Human Communication Research, 32, 469–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00284.x

61.

Weber

K. D.

Patterson

B. R.

(1996). Construction and validation of a communication based emotional support scale. Communication Research Reports, 13, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099609362072

62.

Weigel

D. J.

Brown

O’Riordan

C. K.

(2011). Everyday expressions of commitment and relational uncertainty as predictors of relationship quality and stability over time. Communication Reports, 24, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2010.511400

63.

Wondra

J. D.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(2015). An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences. Psychological Review, 122, 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039252

A relational turbulence theory perspective on women’s grief following miscarriage

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References