The aims of the present study were to (1) adapt and validate the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire (CDAQ) for young Chileans and (2) provide data on the prevalence of cyber dating abuse in young Chileans. As a sample, 1,538 Chilean high school and university students (14–24 years old) participated in the study (59.8% females). Results showed that the CDAQ had an adequate fit with the original correlated four-factor model as well as with a second-order factor model that considered the four scales as primary factors of two secondary factors: victimization (control and aggression from the victimization perspective) and perpetration (control and aggression from the perpetrator’s perspective). Reliability analysis also showed that the questionnaire presented satisfactory values for internal consistency. Scores on the CDAQ were positively correlated with traditional forms of assessing dating violence, providing new evidences of validity. Prevalence data showed cyber dating behaviors are common practices among young Chileans, with around three quarters of that population reporting being victims or aggressors. Finally, prevalence of control (around 72% for both perspectives) was higher than direct aggression (34.4% for victimization and 27% for direct aggression).
ArbuckleJ. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation.
2.
BaglinJ. (2014). Improving your exploratory FACTOR analysis for ordinal data: A demonstration using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 19. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=5
3.
BakerC. K.CarreñoP. K. (2016). Understanding the role of technology in adolescent dating and dating violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0196-5
4.
BakerC. K.HelmS. (2010). Pacific youth and shifting thresholds: Understanding teen dating violence in Hawai’i. Journal of School Violence, 9, 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220903585879
5.
BorrajoE.Gámez-GuadixM.PeredaN.CalveteE. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.063
BurkeS. C.WallenM.Vail-SmithK.KnoxD. (2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1162–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.010
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
DankM.LachmanP.ZweigJ. M.YahnerJ. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8
DoucetteH.CollibeeC.HoodE.StoneD. I. G.DeJesusB.RizzoC. J. (2018). Perpetration of electronic intrusiveness among adolescent females: Associations with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518815725
13.
DrauckerC. B.MartsolfD. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00235.x
14.
ElphinstonR. A.NollerP. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0318
15.
Exner-CortensD. (2018). Measuring adolescent dating violence. In WolfeD. A.TempleJ. R. (Eds.), Adolescent dating violence: Theory, research, and prevention (pp. 315–340). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811797-2.00013-X
16.
Exner-CortensD.GillL.EckenrodeJ. (2016a). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 1, behaviors). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007
17.
Exner-CortensD.GillL.EckenrodeJ. (2016b). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 2, attitudes). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.011
18.
HairJ. F.JrBlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
19.
HeirmanW.WalraveM. (2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2, 1–12.
JenningsW. G.OkeemC.PiqueroA. R.SellersC. S.TheobaldD.FarringtonD. P. (2017). Dating and intimate partner violence among young persons ages 15–30: Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 107–125.
24.
KlettkeB.HallfordD. J.MellorD. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007
25.
KorchmarosJ. D.YbarraM. L.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.BoydD.LenhartA. (2013). Perpetration of teen dating violence in a networked society. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16, 561–567.
26.
LanceC. E.ButtsM. MMichelsL. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cut off criteria: What did they really say?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919
27.
LaraL.López-CeperoJ. (2018). Psychometric properties of the dating violence questionnaire: Reviewing the evidence in Chilean youths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760612
28.
Leal-SotoF.ReinosoL.RojasK.RomeroR. (2010). Violencia en las relaciones de pareja en adolescentes escolares de Arica [Intimate partner violence among adolescent students of Arica, Chile]. Revista Infancia y Educación, 1, 18–35.
29.
LeisringP. A.GiumettiG. W. (2014). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but abusive text messages also hurt: Development and validation of the cyber psychological abuse scale. Partner Abuse, 5, 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.3.323
López-CeperoJ.Vallejos-SaldarriagaJ.Merino-GarcíaM. (2018). Digital intimate partner violence among Peruvian youths: Validation of an instrument and a theoretical proposal. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518803610
32.
LuY.OuytselJ. V.WalraveM.PonnetK.TempleJ. R. (2018). Cross-sectional and temporal associations between cyber dating abuse victimization and mental health and substance use outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.009
33.
MarganskiA.MelanderL. (2018). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1071–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614283
34.
MarshH. W.HauK.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
35.
MelanderL.HughesV. (2018). College partner violence in the digital age: Explaining cyber aggression using routine activities theory. Partner Abuse, 9, 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.9.2.158
36.
MorelliM.BianchiD.ChirumboloA.BaioccoR. (2018). The cyber dating violence inventory. Validation of a new scale for online perpetration and victimization among dating partners. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1305885
37.
PeskinM. FMarkhamC. M.ShegogR.TempleJ. R.BaumlerE. R.AddyR. C.HernandezB.CuccaroP.GabayE. K.ThielM.EmeryS. T. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of the perpetration of cyber dating abuse among early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0568-1
ReedL. A.TolmanR. M.WardL. M. (2016). Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women, 22, 1556–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216630143
40.
ReedL. A.TolmanR. M.WardL. M. (2017). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 59, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.05.015
41.
SmithK. J.CénatJ. M.LapierreA.DionJ.HébertM.CôtéK. (2018). Cyber dating violence: Prevalence and correlates among high school students from small urban areas in Quebec. Journal of Affective Disorders, 234, 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.043
42.
StephensonV. L.WickhamB. M.CapezzaN. M. (2018). Psychological abuse in the context of social media. Violence and Gender, 5, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0061
43.
StonardK. E. (2018). The prevalence and overlap of technology-assisted and offline adolescent dating violence. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0023-4
44.
StonardK. E.BowenE.LawrenceT. R.PriceS. A. (2014). The relevance of technology to the nature, prevalence and impact of adolescent dating violence and abuse: A research synthesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 390–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.005
45.
StonardK. E.BowenE.WalkerK.PriceS. A. (2017). “They’ll always find a way to get to you”: Technology use in adolescent romantic relationships and its role in dating violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2083–2117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515590787
46.
TempleJ.ChoiH. J.BremM.Wolford-ClevengerC.StuartG. L.PeskinM. F.ElmquisJ. (2016). The temporal association between traditional and cyber dating abuse among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0380-3
47.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
48.
Van OuytselJ.PonnetK.WalraveM. (2018). Cyber dating abuse victimization among secondary school students from a lifestyle-routine activities theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516629390
49.
VizcarraM. B.PooA. M. (2011). Violencia de pareja en estudiantes universitarios del sur de chile [intimate partner violence in south Chilean college students]. Universitas Psychologica, 10, 89–98.
50.
ZaporH.Wolford-ClevengerC.ElmquistJ. A.FebresJ.ShoreyR. C.BrasfieldH.LeisringP. A.StuartG. L. (2017). Psychological aggression committed through technology: A study with dating college students. Partner Abuse, 8, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.8.2.127
51.
ZweigJ. M.DankM.YahnerJ.LachmanP. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8
52.
ZweigJ. M.LachmanP.YahnerJ.DankM. (2014). Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0047-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
