Relational ambivalence is conceptualized as having conflicting thoughts and feelings toward one’s partner or relationship. The current study explored how ambivalence about an ex-partner in a post-dissolution stage was associated with breakup distress as well as reconciliation. The moderating role of whether the relationship had previously cycled through breakups and renewals (on-off) or not (non-cyclical) was also examined. The 275 participants completed an initial survey following their most recent breakup (within the past 30 days) and up to five monthly surveys. Analyses showed cognitive and emotional ambivalence were associated with greater breakup distress and a greater likelihood of relationship renewal. Additionally, although cyclical partners had slightly greater emotional, but not cognitive, ambivalence toward their former partners, relationship type did not moderate the associations between ambivalence and breakup distress or reconciliation. The findings provide insights on how ambivalence could be incorporated into research on post-dissolution experiences.
ArriagaX. B.ReedJ. T.GoodfriendW.AgnewC. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1045
2.
BrennerR. E.VogelD. L. (2015). Measuring thought content valence after a breakup: Development of the positive and negative ex-relationship thoughts (PANERT) scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000073
3.
CliffordC. E.VennumA.BuskM.FinchamF. D. (2017). Testing the impact of sliding versus deciding in cyclical and non-cyclical relationships. Personal Relationships, 24, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12179
4.
ConnidisI. A. (2015). Exploring ambivalence in family ties: Progress and prospects. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12150
5.
CupachW. R.SpitzbergB. H.BolingbrokeC. M.TellitocciB. S. (2011). Persistence of attempts to reconcile a terminated romantic relationship: A partial test of relational goal pursuit theory. Communication Reports, 24, 99–115.
6.
DaileyR. M. (2020). On-again, off-again relationships: Navigating (in)stability in romantic relationships. Cambridge University Press.
7.
DaileyR. M.BrodyN.LeFebvreL.CrookB. (2013). Charting changes in commitment: Trajectories of on-again/off-again relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 1020–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513480284
8.
DaileyR. M.CrookB.BrodyN.LeFebvreL. (2017). Fluctuations in on-again/off-again in relationships: Foreboding or functional?Personal Relationships, 24, 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12211
9.
DaileyR. M.JinB.PfiesterR. A.BeckG. (2011). On-again/off-again relationships: What keeps partners coming back?Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.503249
10.
DaileyR. M.LeFebvreL.CrookB.BrodyN. (2016). Communication and relational uncertainty in on-again/off-again romantic relationships: Assessing changes and patterns across recalled turning points. Western Journal of Communication, 80, 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2015.1094123
11.
DaileyR. M.McCrackenA. A.JinB.RossettoK. R.GreenE. W. (2013). Negotiating breakups and renewals: Types of on-again/off-again dating relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 77, 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.775325
12.
DaileyR. M.MiddletonA.GreenE. W. (2012). Predicting perceived relational stability in on-again/off-again relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 52–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511420192
13.
DaileyR. M.PfiesterA.JinB.BeckG.ClarkG. (2009). On-again/off-again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships?Personal Relationships, 16, 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01208.x
14.
DavisD.ShaverP. R.VernonM. L. (2003). Physical, emotional, and behavioral reactions to breaking up: The roles of gender, age, emotional involvement, and attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007006
15.
ElliotA. J.DevineP. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
16.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson.
GriffithR. L.GillathO.ZhaoX.MartinezR. (2017). Staying friends with ex-romantic partners: Predictors, reasons, and outcomes. Personal Relationships, 24, 550–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12197
19.
Halpern-MeekinS.ManningW. D.GiordanoP. C.LongmoreM. A. (2013a). Relationship churning in emerging adulthood: On/off relationships and sex with an ex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28, 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558412464524
20.
Halpern-MeekinS.ManningW. D.GiordanoP. C.LongmoreM. A. (2013b). Relationship churning, physical violence, and verbal abuse in young adult relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01029.x
21.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC.LevyN. (2015). An action-based model of cognitive-dissonance processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414566449
22.
HuntL. J.ChungM. C. (2012). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of relationship dissolution on psychological distress. In PaludiM. A. (Ed.), The psychology of love, (Vol. 1., pp. 107–131). Praeger.
23.
JoelS.MacDonaldG.Page-GouldE. (2018). Wanting to stay and wanting to go: Unpacking the content and structure of relationship stay/leave decision processes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722834
24.
KnoppK.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS.OwenJ.MarkmanH. (2014). Fluctuations in commitment over time and relationship outcomes. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000029
25.
Koenig KellasJ.BeanD.CunninghamC.ChengK. Y. (2008). The ex-files: Trajectories, turning points, and adjustment in the development of post-dissolution relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507086804
LavnerJ. A.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2012). Incremental change or initial differences? Testing two models of marital deterioration. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029052
28.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
29.
LevyN.Harmon-JonesC.Harmon-JonesE. (2018). Dissonance and discomfort: Does a simple cognitive inconsistency evoke a negative affective state?Motivation Science, 4, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000079
30.
LewandowskiG. W.AronA.BassisS.KunakJ. (2006). Losing a self-expanding relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 13, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00120.x
31.
LockeK. D.BraunC. C. (2009). Ambivalence versus valence: Analyzing the effects of opposing attitudes. Social Cognition, 27, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.89
32.
MacDonaldG.LockeK. D.SpielmannS. S.JoelS. (2012). Insecure attachment predicts ambivalence social threat and reward perceptions in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512465221
33.
MasonA. E.SbarraD. A.BryanA. E. B.LeeL. A. (2012). Staying connected when coming apart: The psychological correlates of contact and sex with an ex-partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.5.488
34.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.Bar-OnN.Ein-DorT. (2010). The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017366
35.
MogilskiJ. K.WellingL. L. M. (2017). Staying friends with an ex: Sex and dark personality traits predict motivation for post-relationship friendship. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.016
36.
MonkJ. K. (2017). Boomerang couple: The role of differentiation, violence, commitment, and deciding in on-off relationship instability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
37.
MonkJ. K.OgolskyB. G.OswaldF. R. (2018). Coming out and getting back in: On-off instability and distress in same and different-sex relationships. Family Relations, 67, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12336
38.
Newby-ClarkI. R.McGregorI.ZannaM. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.2.157
39.
OgolskyB. G.SurraC. A.MonkJ. K. (2016). Pathways to commitment to wed: The development and dissolution of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12260
40.
ParkY.DebrotA.SpielmannS. S.JoelS.ImpettE.MacDonaldG. (2019). Distinguishing dismissing from fearful attachment in the association between closeness and commitment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618768823
41.
RodriguezL. M.WickhamR. E.ØverupC. SAmspokerA. B. (2016). Past and present, day by day: Communication with former romantic partners, relationship-contingent self-esteem, and current relationship outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.09.005
SaffreyC.EhrenbergM. (2007). When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and post relationship adjustment. Personal Relationships, 14, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00160.x
44.
SbarraD. A.EmeryR. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00112.x
SimpsonJ. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 683–692.
47.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
48.
TanK.AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E.HarveyS. M. (2015). Committed to us: Predicting relationships closeness following nonmarital romantic relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514536293
49.
ThompsonM. M. (1995). ‘Should i stay or should i go now?’ ambivalence and the dissolution of dating relationships (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (UMI Number: AAMNN89571).
50.
ThompsonM. M.HolmesJ. G. (1996). Ambivalence in close relationships: Conflicted cognitions as a catalyst for change. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 3; pp. 497–530). Guildford.
51.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
van HarreveldF.RutjensB. T.RotteveelM.NordgrenL. F.van der PligtJ. (2009). Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015
53.
VennumA.HardyN.SibleyD. S.FinchamF. D. (2015). Dedication and sliding in emerging adult cyclical and non-cyclical romantic relationships. Family Relations, 64, 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12126
54.
VennumA.JohnsonM. D. (2014). The impact of premarital cycling on early marriage. Family Relations, 63, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12082
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
