Stability of shared appraisal: The role of attachment and implications for relationships and health

Abstract

In the context of coping with chronic illness, shared appraisal refers to one person’s perception that the illness is a shared issue. Despite increasing research linking shared appraisal to positive relationship and health outcomes, whether it is static or fluctuates across time has not yet been investigated. Fluctuations in shared appraisal may affect patient and spouse well-being and influence disease management. We investigated the association of daily shared appraisal fluctuations (operationalized as intraindividual standard deviations) to relationship satisfaction, psychological well-being, and diabetes-specific well-being over 2 weeks among 199 couples in which one person had type 1 diabetes. In addition, we examined attachment insecurity as a correlate of shared appraisal fluctuations. Individuals higher in anxiety or avoidance may more frequently reevaluate their relationship. Thus, their shared appraisal may be more reactive to daily events. Actor–partner interdependence models showed greater fluctuations in spouse appraisal were associated with lower patient relationship satisfaction (partner effect) but not with spouse relationship satisfaction and with greater spouse psychological distress (actor effect) but not patient psychological distress. There were no actor or partner effects of patient appraisal fluctuations on these outcomes. In terms of diabetes outcomes, regression analyses showed that greater fluctuations in patient and spouse appraisal were each associated with higher patient diabetes distress, and greater fluctuations in spouse appraisal were associated with lower patient self-care. Higher attachment anxiety was related to greater appraisal fluctuations in the spouse but not the patient. These findings highlight the importance of spouse appraisal stability for spouse relationships and well-being and for patient diabetes outcomes and suggest that attachment insecurity may be implicated in the instability of shared appraisal.

Keywords

Actor–partner interdependence modeling attachment communal coping health relationships shared appraisal stability type 1 diabetes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arriaga

X. B.

(2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765.

Arriaga

X. B.

Reed

J. T.

Goodfriend

Agnew

C. R.

(2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065.

Berg

C. A.

Wiebe

D. J.

Butner

Bloor

Bradstreet

Upchurch

Hayes

Stephenson

Nail

Patton

(2008). Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychology and Aging, 23, 505–516.

Berg

C. A.

Helgeson

V. S.

Tracy

E. L.

Butner

Kelly

C. S.

Van Vleet

Litchman

M. L.

(2020). Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes. Manuscript in preparation.

Bowlby

(1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). Basic Books.

Brennan

K. A.

Clark

C. L.

Shaver

P. R.

(1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson

J. A.

Rholes

W. S.

(Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford.

Campbell

Simpson

J. A.

Boldry

Kashy

D. A.

(2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531.

Campbell

Simpson

J. A.

Boldry

J. G.

Rubin

(2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 14–31.

Canterberry

Gillath

(2013). Neural evidence for a multifaceted model of attachment security. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 232–240.

10.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

(1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.

11.

Diener

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

12.

Fraley

R. C.

(2019). Attachment in adulthood: Recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 401–422.

13.

Fraley

R. C.

Waller

N. G.

Brennan

K. A.

(2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.

14.

Funk

J. L.

Rogge

R. D.

(2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583.

15.

Girme

Y. U.

Agnew

C. R.

VanderDrift

L. E.

Harvey

S. M.

Rholes

W. S.

Simpson

J. A.

(2018). The ebbs and flows of attachment: Within-person variation in attachment undermine secure individuals’ relationship wellbeing across time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 397–421.

16.

Hallgren

K. A.

McCrady

B. S.

(2016). We-language and sustained reductions in drinking in couple-based treatment for alcohol use disorders. Family Process, 55, 62–78.

17.

Helgeson

V. S.

Jakubiak

Seltman

Hausmann

Korytkowski

(2017). Implicit and explicit communal coping in couples with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 1099–1121.

18.

Helgeson

V. S.

Berg

C. A.

Kelly

C. S.

Van Vleet

Zajdel

Tracy

E. L.

Litchman

M. L.

(2019). Patient and partner illness appraisals and health among adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 42, 480–492.

19.

Helgeson

V. S.

Jakubiak

Van Vleet

Zajdel

(2018). Communal coping and adjustment to chronic illness: Theory update and evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 170–195.

20.

Johnson

M. D.

Anderson

J. R.

Walker

Wilcox

Lewis

V. L.

Robbins

D. C.

(2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 722–730.

21.

Karan

Rosenthal

Robbins

M. L.

(2019). Meta-analytic evidence that we-talk predicts relationship and personal functioning in romantic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 2624–2651.

22.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

23.

Kernis

M. H.

(2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. Journal of Personality, 73, 1569–1605.

24.

Kernis

M. H.

Whisenhunt

C. R.

Waschull

S. B.

Greenier

K. D.

Berry

A. J.

Herlocker

C. E.

Anderson

C. A.

(1998). Multiple facets of self-esteem and their relations to depressive symptoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 657–668.

25.

Lee

Gillath

(2016). Perceived closeness to multiple social connections and attachment style: A longitudinal examination. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 680–689.

26.

Lee

Helgeson

V. S.

Van Vleet

Tracy

E. L.

Kent de Grey

R. G.

Zajdel

Berg

C. A.

(2020). Implications of we-talk for relationships and health among patients with type 1 diabetes and their spouses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37, 345–354.

27.

Lemay

E. P.

Clark

M. S.

(2015). Motivated cognition in relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 72–75.

28.

Lewin

A. B.

LaGreca

A. M.

Geffken

G. R.

Williams

L. B.

Duke

D. C.

Storch

E. A.

Silverstein

J. H.

(2009). Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: The self-care inventory (SCI). Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 999–1007.

29.

Lyons

R. F.

Mickelson

K. D.

Sullivan

M. J.

Coyne

J. C.

(1998). Coping as a communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579–605.

30.

Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(2007). Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 139–156.

31.

Moore

M. T.

Fresco

D. M.

(2012). Depressive realism: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 496–509.

32.

Murray

S. L.

Holmes

J. G.

Griffin

D. W.

(1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.

33.

Orehek

Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis

Quick

Weaverling

G. C.

(2017). Attachment and self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 365–380.

34.

Pinheiro

Bates

DebRoy

Sarkar

(2018). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-137. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=nlme

35.

Polonsky

W. H.

Fisher

Earles

Dudl

R. J.

Lees

Mullan

Jackson

R. A.

(2005). Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: Development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care, 28, 626–631.

36.

Porter

L. S.

Davis

Keefe

F. J.

(2007). Attachment and pain: Recent findings and future directions. Pain, 128, 195–198.

37.

Radloff

L. S.

(1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

38.

Rentscher

K. E.

(2019). Communal coping in couples with health problems. Frontiers in Psychology , 10 , 398. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00398

39.

Robbins

M. L.

Mehl

M. R.

Smith

H. L.

Weihs

K. L.

(2013). Linguistic indicators of patient, couple, and family adjustment following breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 1501–1508.

40.

Rohrbaugh

M. J.

Mehl

M. R.

Shoham

Reilly

E. S.

Ewy

G. A.

(2008). Prognostic significance of spouse we talk in couples coping with heart failure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 781–789.

41.

Shaver

P. R.

Mikulincer

(2006). Attachment theory, individual psychodynamics, and relationship functioning. In Perlman

Vangelisti

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 251–271). Cambridge University Press.

42.

Simpson

J. A.

(2019). Bringing life history theory into relationship science. Personal Relationships, 26, 4–20.

43.

Simpson

J. A.

Rholes

W. S.

(2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 19–24.

44.

Stephens

M. A. P.

Franks

M. M.

Rook

K. S.

Iida

Hemphill

R. C.

Salem

J. K.

(2013). Spouses’ attempts to regulate day-to-day dietary adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology, 32, 1029–1037.

45.

Talbot

Nouwen

Gingras

Gosselin

Audet

(1997). The assessment of diabetes-related cognitive and social factors: The Multidimensional Diabetes Questionnaire. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 291–312.

46.

Tracy

E. L.

Berg

C. A.

Baucom

K. J. W.

Turner

S. L.

Kelly

C. S.

Van Vleet

Butner

Helgeson

V. S.

(2019). Daily sleep quality and daily stressors in couples coping with Type 1 Diabetes. Health Psychology, 38, 75–83.

47.

Van Vleet

Helgeson

V. S.

Berg

C. A.

(2019). The importance of having fun: Daily play among adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 3695–3710.

48.

Whitton

S. W.

Rhoades

G. K.

Whisman

M. A.

(2014). Fluctuation in relationship quality over time and individual well-being: Main, mediated, and moderated effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 858–871.

49.

Whitton

S. W.

Whisman

M. A.

(2010). Relationship satisfaction instability and depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 791–794.

50.

Zajdel

Helgeson

V. S.

(in press). Communal coping: A multi-method approach and links to relationships and health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

51.

Zajdel

Helgeson

V. S.

Kelly

C. S.

Berg

C. A.

(2018). Shared illness appraisal and self-efficacy among adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318817895

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB