Using daily diary data from 81 same-sex couples, we examined the link between stress experienced outside the relationship (external) and within the relationship (internal) for individuals (stress spillover) and their partners (stress crossover). Extending prior literature, we examined spillover and crossover of both common external (e.g., work stress) and sexual minority stress (e.g., discrimination based on sexual orientation) and the extent to which individuals’ own and their partner’s difficulties in emotion regulation moderated these associations. We found compelling evidence for spillover of common external stress and crossover of both types of stress. Further, we found both concurrent (same day) and lagged (next-day) stress spillover and crossover processes for both types of external stressors, moderated by both partners’ reported difficulties in emotion regulation. Findings related to stress spillover and crossover as well as implications for researchers and clinicians working with same-sex couples are discussed.
AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). American Psychological Association.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 115–128. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00001.x
5.
BodenmannG. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 54, 34–49.
6.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significant for marital functioning. In RevensonT.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). American Psychological Association.
7.
BodenmannG.SchärM.GmelchS. (2008). Multidimensional stress questionnaire for couples (MDS-Q). Unpublished questionnaire.
8.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
9.
BradleyB.DeFifeJ. A.GuarnacciaC.PhiferJ.FaniN.ResslerK. J.WestenD. (2011). Emotion dysregulation and negative affect: Association with psychiatric symptoms [CME]. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 685–691. doi:10.4088/JCP.10m06409blu
10.
BuckA. A.NeffL. A. (2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 698–708. doi:10.1037/a0029260
11.
ButlerE. A.RandallA. K. (2013). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–210. doi:10.1177/1754073912451630
12.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510
13.
CaoH.ZhouN.FineM.LiangY.LiJ.Mills-KoonceW. R. (2017). Sexual minority stress and same-sex relationship well-being: A meta-analysis of research prior to the U.S. nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage: stress and same-sex couple relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 1258–1277. doi:10.1111/jomf.12415
ChiuH. M. C.EwingS.HolleyS. R. (2014, May). Keeping your cool in relationship conflicts: Emotion regulation and the demand-withdraw pattern. Poster presented at the 26th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science, 22 May 2014–25 May 2014, San Francisco, FL.
16.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
17.
FalconierM. K.NussbeckF.BodenmannG.SchneiderH.BradburyT. (2015). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41, 221–235. doi:10.1111/jmft.12073
18.
FalconierM. K.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (Eds.). (2016). Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. Routledge.
19.
FeinsteinB. A.McConnellE.DyarC.MustanskiB.NewcombM. E. (2018). Minority stress and relationship functioning among young male same-sex couples: An examination of actor–partner interdependence models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 416–426. doi:10.1037/ccp0000296
20.
GratzK. L.RoemerL. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54. doi:10.1023/B: JOBA.0000007455.08539.9
21.
GrossJ. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
22.
GrossR. (2015). Psychology: The science of mind and behavior. (7th ed.). Hodder Education.
23.
HatzenbuehlerM. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? A psychological mediation framework. Psychological Nulletin, 135, 707–730. doi:10.1037/a0016441
24.
HatzenbuehlerM. L.McLaughlinK. A.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2008). Emotion regulation and internalizing symptoms in a longitudinal study of sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 1270–1278. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01924.x
25.
HornA. B.MaerckerA. (2016). Intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation and adjustment symptoms in couples: The role of co-brooding and co-reappraisal. BMC Psychology, 51, 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0159-7
26.
KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.BurtS. A.McGueM. (2008). Growth curve models for indistinguishable dyads using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling: The case of adolescent twins’ conflict with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 44, 316–329. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.316
27.
KelleyH.ThibautJ. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.
28.
LavnerJ. A.BradburyT. N. (2012). Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce?Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 1–10. doi:10.1037/a0025966
29.
LeBlancA. J.FrostD. M.WightR. G. (2015). Minority stress and stress proliferation among same-sex and other marginalized couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 40–59. doi:10.1111/jomf.12160
30.
LevensonR. W.HaaseC. M.BlochL.HolleyS. R.SeiderB. J. (2013). Emotion regulation in couples. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 267–283). Guiford Press.
31.
LewisR. J.DerlegaV. J.BerndtA.MorrisL. M.RoseS. (2001). An empirical analysis of stressors for gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 63–88. doi:10.1300/J082v42n01_04
32.
LopesP. N.SaloveyP.CôtéS.BeersM.PettyR. E. (2005). Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5, 113–118. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113
33.
MatudM. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1401–1415. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.010
34.
McNultyJ. K.HellmuthJ. C. (2008). Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence in newlyweds. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 794–797. doi:10.1037/a0013516
35.
MereishE. H.PoteatV. P. (2015). A relational model of sexual minority mental and physical health: The negative effects of shame on relationships, loneliness, and health. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 425–437. doi:10.1037/cou0000088
36.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
37.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 435. doi:10.1037/a0015663
OtisM. D.RostoskyS. S.RiggleE. D. B.HamrinR. (2006). Stress and relationship quality in same-sex couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 81–99. doi:10.1177/0265407506060179
40.
Pizmony-LevyO.PonceA. (2013). Framing strategies and public support for the legalization of marriage between two people of the same sex. Sociological Perspectives, 56, 169–190. doi:10.1525/sop.2013.56.2.169
41.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
42.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
43.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2017). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 96–106. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.010
44.
RandallA. KSchoebiD (Eds.). (2018). Interpersonal emotion dynamics in close relationships. Cambridge University Press.
45.
RepettiR.WangS. W. (2017). Effects of job stress on family relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 15–18. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.010
46.
RobinsR. W.CaspiA.MoffittT. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251. doi:10.1037//O022-3514.79.2.251
47.
RogersT. L.EmanuelK.BradfordJ. (2003). Sexual minorities seeking services: A retrospective study of the mental health concerns of lesbian and bisexual women. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7, 127–146. doi:10.1300/J155v07n01_09
48.
RusuP. P.BodenmannG.KayserK. (2019). Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 359–376. doi:10.1177/0265407517751664
49.
SAS Institute. (2011). SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute, Inc.
50.
ScottS. B.SliwinskiM. J.MogleJ. A.AlmeidaD. M. (2014). Age, stress, and emotional complexity: Results from two studies of daily experiences. Psychology and Aging, 29, 577–587. doi:10.1037/a0037282.
51.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (1999). An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE.
52.
StoneA. A.KesslerR. C.HaythornthwaiteJ. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for the researcher. Journal of Personality, 59, 575–607. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep9110141812
53.
TotenhagenC. J.ButlerE. A.CurranM. A.SeridoJ. (2016). The calm after the storm: Relationship length as associated with couples’ daily variability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 768–791. doi:10.1177/0265407515597562
54.
TotenhagenC. J.ButlerE. A.RidleyC. A. (2012). Daily stress, closeness, and satisfaction in gay and lesbian couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 219–233. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01349.x
55.
TotenhagenC. J.CurranM. A.SeridoJ.ButlerE. A. (2013). Good days, bad days: Do sacrifices improve relationship quality?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 881–900. doi:10.1177/0265407512472475
56.
WestmanM. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54, 717–751.
57.
WestmanM. (2006). Crossover of stress and strain in the work-family context. In JonesF.BurkeR. J.WestmanM. (Eds.), Work-life balance: A psychological perspective (pp. 163–184). Psychology Press.
58.
WestmanM.VinokurA. D. (1998). Unraveling the relationship of distress levels within couples: Common stressors, empathic reactions, or crossover via social interaction?Human Relations, 51, 137–156. doi:10.1023/A:101691011
59.
ZakiJ.WilliamsW. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13, 803–810. doi:10.1037/a0033839
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
