Two studies explored how the triarchic dimensions of psychopathy predicted relationship outcomes in nonclinical samples. In Study 1, using a predominantly student sample (N = 100, 24% men, 76% women), results revealed significant negative associations between meanness and Sternberg’s (1997) components of love (intimacy, passion, and commitment). In Study 2, using a more gender-balanced online community sample (N = 125, 53% men, 47% women), we replicated results from Study 1 and found additional negative associations between self-reported physical aggression, psychological aggression and love in intimate relationships. Further, multivariate analyses revealed that deficits in love explained incremental variance in intimate partner aggression, over and above the triarchic constructs of meanness and disinhibition. Implications for how dimensions of psychopathy manifest in close intimate relationships are discussed.
AckerM.DavisM. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50. doi:10.1177/0265407592091002
2.
AdamsH. M.LuevanoV. X.JonasonP. K. (2014). Risky business: Willingness to be caught in an extra-pair relationship, relationship experience, and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 204–207. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.008
3.
AliF.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2010). The dark side of love and life satisfaction: Associations with intimate relationships, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 228–233. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.016
4.
BaughmanH. M.JonasonP. K.VeselkaL.VernonP. A. (2014). Four shades of sexual fantasies linked to the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 47–51. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.034
5.
BlagovP. S.PatrickC. J.OostK. M.GoodmanJ. A.PughA. T. (2016). Triarchic psychopathy measure: Validity in relation to normal-range traits, personality pathology, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30, 71–81. doi:10.1521/pedi_2015_29_182
6.
ChristianE.SellbomM.WilkinsonR. B. (2017). Clarifying the associations between individual differences in general attachment styles and psychopathy. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 329–339. doi:10.1037/per0000206
7.
ChristianE.SellbomM.WilkinsonR. B. (2019a). Is psychopathy associated with deficits in bonding in an adult noninstitutionalized sample? The association between intimate social network size, attachment behavior, and psychopathy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 1996–2014.
8.
ChristianE.SellbomM.WilkinsonR. B. (2019b). Evaluating the association between psychopathy and specific attachment models in adults. Journal of Personality Disorders, 33, 1–37.
9.
CleckleyH. (1941). The mask of sanity: An attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. Oxford, England: Mosby.
10.
CookeD. J.MichieC. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171
11.
DaddsM. R.AllenJ. L.OliverB. R.FaulknerN.LeggeK.MoulC.…ScottS. (2012). Love, eye contact and the developmental origins of empathy v. psychopathy. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200, 191–196. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085720
12.
DrislaneL. E.PatrickC. J. (2017). Integrating alternative conceptions of psychopathic personality: A latent variable model of triarchic psychopathy constructs. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 110–132. doi:10.1521/pedi_2016_30_240
13.
DrislaneL. E.PatrickC. J.ArsalG. (2014). Clarifying the content coverage of differing psychopathy inventories through reference to the triarchic psychopathy measure. Psychological Assessment, 26, 350–362. doi:10.1037/a0035152
14.
EngelG.OlsonK. R.PatrickC. (2002). The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 839–853. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00090-3
15.
FerreiraL. C.NarcisoI.NovoR. F.PereiraC. R. (2014). Predicting couple satisfaction: The role of differentiation of self, sexual desire and intimacy in heterosexual individuals. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29, 390–404. doi:10.1080/14681994.2014.957498
16.
GrahamJ. M. (2011). Measuring love in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 748–771. doi:10.1177/0265407510389126
17.
HallJ. R.DrislaneL. E.PatrickC. J.MoranoM.LilienfeldS. O.PoythressN. G. (2014). Development and validation of triarchic construct scales from the psychopathic personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 447–461. doi:10.1037/a0035665
18.
HatfieldE.WalsterG. W. (1978). A new look at love. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
19.
HillC. D.NeumannC. S.RogersR. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the psychopathy checklist: Screening version in offenders with axis I disorders. Psychological Assessment, 16, 90–95.
20.
HinesD. A.SaudinoK. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the revised conflict tactics scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197–217. doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.197
21.
HoltzmanN. S.DonnellanM. B. (2017). A simulator of the degree to which random responding leads to biases in the correlations between two individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 187–192. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.013
22.
HoltzmanN. S.StrubeM. J. (2013). Above and beyond short-term mating, long-term mating is uniquely tied to human personality. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 1101–1129. doi:10.1177/147470491301100514
23.
HydeJ. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057
24.
JonasonP. K.KoenigB. L.TostJ. (2010). Living a fast life: The Dark Triad and life history theory. Human Nature, 21, 428–442. doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9102-4
25.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P.WebsterG. D.SchmittD. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. doi:10.1002/per.698
26.
JonasonP. K.LuevanoV. X.AdamsH. M. (2012). How the Dark Triad traits predict relationship choices. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 180–184. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.007
27.
JoseA.O’LearyK. D.Graña GomezJ. L.ForanH. M. (2014). Risk factors for men’s intimate physical aggression in Spain. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 287–297. doi:10.1007/s10896-014-9589-2
28.
KardumI.Hudek-KnezevicJ.MehicN.PilekM. (2018). The effects of similarity in the Dark Triad traits on the relationship quality of dating couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.020
29.
KarpmanB. (1941). On the need of separating psychopathy into two distinct clinical types: The symptomatic and the idiopathic. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 3, 112–137.
30.
KastnerR. M.SellbomM. (2012). Hypersexuality in college students: The role of psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 644–649. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.005
31.
KiireS. (2017). Psychopathy rather than Machiavellianism or narcissism facilitates intimate partner violence via fast life strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 401–406. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.043
32.
KimonisE. R.FlemingG.BriggsN.Brouwer-FrenchL.FrickP. J.HawesD. J.…DaddsM. (2018). Parent-child interaction therapy adapted for preschoolers with callous-unemotional traits: An open trial pilot study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48, S347–S361.
33.
KoladichS. J.AtkinsonB. E. (2016). The Dark Triad and relationship preferences: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 253–255. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.023
34.
KüneckeJ.MokrosA.OlderbakS.WilhelmO. (2018). Facial responsiveness of psychopaths to the emotional expressions of others. PLoS One, 13, e0190714. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190714
35.
LemieuxR.HaleJ. L. (1999). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the triangular theory of love. Psychological Reports, 85, 497–503. doi:10.2466/PR0.85.6.497-503
36.
LemieuxR.HaleJ. L. (2000). Intimacy, passion, and commitment among married individuals: Further testing of the triangular theory of love. Psychological Reports, 87, 941–948. doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.941
37.
LilienfeldS. O. (2013). Is psychopathy a syndrome? Commentary on Marcus, Fulton, and Edens. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 85–86.
38.
LoveA. B.HolderM. D. (2016). Can romantic relationship quality mediate the relation between psychopathy and subjective well-being?Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2407–2429. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9700-2
39.
MagerK. L.BresinK.VeronaE. (2014). Gender, psychopathy factors, and intimate partner violence. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 257–267. doi:10.1037/per0000072
40.
MansonJ. H. (2019, March). Life history strategy, the dark triad, and everyday social behavior. Paper presented at the International Convention of Psychological Science, The Palais des Congrès, de Paris, France, 07–09 March 2019.
41.
MansonJ. H.GervaisM. M.FesslerD. M. T.KlineM. A. (2014). Subclinical primary psychopathy, but not physical formidability or attractiveness, predicts conversational dominance in a zero-acquaintance situation. PLoS One, 9, e113135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113135
42.
McCordW.McCordJ. (1964). The psychopath: An essay on the criminal mind. Oxford, England: D. Van Nostrand.
43.
MowleE. N.KelleyS. E.EdensJ. F.DonnellanM. B.SmithS. T.WygantD. B.SellbomM. (2017). Development of an inconsistent responding scale for the triarchic psychopathy measure. Psychological Assessment, 29, 990–1000. doi:10.1037/pas0000395
44.
PatrickC. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Unpublished test manual. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
45.
PatrickC. J.DrislaneL. E. (2015). Triarchic model of psychopathy: Origins, operationalizations, and observed linkages with personality and general psychopathology. Journal of Personality, 83, 627–643.
46.
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938. doi:10.1017/S0954579409000492
47.
PorterS.WoodworthM. (2006). Psychopathy and aggression. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 481–494). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
49.
SellbomM. (2018). The triarchic psychopathy model: Theory and measurement. In DeLisiM. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of psychopathy and crime (pp. 241–264). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
SellbomM.DonnellyK. M.RockR. C.PhillipsT. R.Ben-PorathY. S. (2017). Examining gender as moderating the association between psychopathy and substance abuse. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 376–390. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2016.1258466
51.
SimpsonK. A.GangestadS. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
52.
SkeemJ. L.PolaschekD. L.PatrickC. J.LilienfeldS. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162. doi:10.1177/1529100611426706
53.
SkeemJ. L.PoythressN.EdensJ. F.LilienfeldS. O.CaleE. M. (2003). Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 513–546. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00098-8
54.
SternbergR. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.
55.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313–335.
56.
SternbergR. J. (1998). Cupid’s arrow: The course of love through time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001
58.
SumterS. R.ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2013). Perceptions of love across the lifespan: Differences in passion, intimacy, and commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 417–427. doi:10.1177/0165025413492486
59.
UnrauA. M.MorryM. M. (2019). The subclinical psychopath in love: Mediating effects of attachment styles. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 421–449. doi:10.1177/0265407517734068
60.
WattsA. L.DonahueK.LilienfeldS. O.LatzmanR. D. (2017). Gender moderates psychopathic traits’ relations with self-reported childhood maltreatment. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 175–180. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.011
61.
WebsterG. D.BryanA. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 917–922. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.007
62.
WhitleyB. E. (1993). Reliability and aspects of the construct validity of Sternberg’s triangular love scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 475–480. doi:10.1177/0265407593103013
63.
YooH.Bartle-HaringS.DayR. D.GangammaR. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40, 275–293. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072
