Considering the Generativity Model in later life by Cheng, the objective of this study was to analyze how grandparents’ socializing values and styles toward grandchildren aged 6–12 are associated with grandparents’ personal growth. A sample of 300 grandparents participated in this study. Socializing styles (authoritative and permissive) mediated between participants’ personal and relationship values and their personal growth. Abilities and knowledge values showed a positive and a significant relation with grandparents’ personal growth. In contrast, the authoritarian style and materialistic values were not associated with grandparents’ personal growth. These results show how commitment to generative concerns and acts, such as grandchildren’s socialization, relates to grandparents’ well-being. The need to develop social programs promoting intergenerational shared activities and positive family interactions is stressed.
AntonopoulouK.AlexopoulosD. A.Maridaki-KassotakiK. (2012). Perceptions of father parenting style, empathy, and self-esteem among Greek preadolescents. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 293–309. doi:10.1080/01494929.2012.665016
2.
ArpinoB.BordoneV.BalboN. (2018). Grandparenting, education and subjective well-being of older Europeans. European Journal of Ageing, 3, 251–263. doi:10.1007/s10433
3.
ArranzE.OlivaA.OlabarrietaF.AntolínL. (2010). Comparative analysis of new family structures as enhancing contexts of children´s psychological development. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33, 503–513. doi:10.1174/021037010793139653
4.
BairdB. M.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9
5.
BaumrindD. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In Brooks-GunJ.LernerR.PetersenA. C. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York, NY: Garland.
6.
BengstsonV. L.CopenC. E.PutneyN. M.SilversteinM. (2009). A longitudinal study of the intergenerational transmission of religion. International Sociology, 24, 325–345. doi:10.1177/0268580909102911
7.
BigelowB. J. (1977). Children’s friendship expectations: A cognitive–developmental study. Child Development, 48, 246–253. doi:10.2307/1128905
8.
BordoneV.ArpinoB.AassveA. (2017). Patterns of grandparental child care across Europe: The role of the policy context and working mothers’ need. Ageing & Society, 35, 845–873. doi:10.1017/S0144686X1600009X
9.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
CasasF.FiguerF.GonzálezM.MaloS. (2007). The values adolescents aspire to their well-being and the values parents aspire to for their children. Social Indicators Research, 84, 271–290. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9141-3
11.
ChaoR. K. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72, 1832–1843. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00381
12.
ChecaP.Abundis-GutierrezA. (2017). Parenting and temperament influence on school success in 9-13 year olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Advance online publication. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00543
13.
ChengS. T. (2009). Generativity in later life: Perceived respect from younger generations as a determinant of goal disengagement and psychological well-being. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64, 45–54. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbn027
14.
CherlinA.FurstenbergF. F. (1985). Styles and strategies of grandparenting. In BengstonV. L.RobertsonJ. F. (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 97–116). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Di GessaG.GlaserK.PriceD.RibeE.TinkerA. (2016). What drives national differences in intensive grandparental childcare in Europe?Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71, 141–153. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbv007
16.
DöringA. K.SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.GroenenP. J. F.GlatzelV.HarasimczukJ.…BilskyW. (2015). Cross-cultural evidence of value structures and priorities in childhood. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 675–699. doi:10.1111/bjop.12116
17.
EriksonE. H. (2000). El ciclo vital completado [The life cicle completed]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
18.
EriksonE. H.EriksonJ. M.KivnickH. Q. (1986). Vital involvement in old age. New York, NY: Norton.
19.
FeldmanR. S. (2010). Child development. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
20.
Fuller-ThomsonE.SerbinskiS.McCormackL. (2014). The rewards of caring for grandchildren: Black Canadian grandmothers who are custodial parents, co-parents, and extensive babysitters. GrandFamilies: The Contemporary Journal of Research, Practice and Policy, 1, 4–31. Retrieved fromhttps://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=grandfamilies
21.
GoodsellT. L.BatesJ. S.BehnkeA. O. (2011). Fatherhood stories: Grandparents, grandchildren, and gender differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 134–154. doi:10.1177/0265407510386447
22.
GrossbaumM. F.BatesG. W. (2002). Correlates of psychological well-being at midlife: The role of generativity, agency and communion, and narrative themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 120–127. doi:10.1080/01650250042000654
23.
GrusecJ. E. (2002). Parental socialization and children’s acquisition of values. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Volume 5 practical issues in parenting (pp. 143–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
GrusecJ. E.GoodnowJ. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.30.1.4
25.
GutierrezI. A.GoodwinL. J.KirkinisK.MattisJ. S. (2014). Religious socialization in African American families: The relative influence of parents, grandparents, and siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 3, 779–789. doi:10.1037/a0035732
26.
HayslipB.BlumenthalH.GarnerA. (2014). Health and grandparent−grandchild well-being: One-year longitudinal findings for custodial grandfamilies. Journal of Aging and Health, 26, 559–582. doi:10.1177/0898264314525664
27.
HustonA. C.RipkeM. N. (2006). Middle childhood: Contexts of development. In HustonA. C.RipkeM. N. (Eds.), Developmental contexts in middle childhood: Bridges to adolescence and adulthood (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
JöreskogK. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LangJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
JoshanlooM.GhaediG. (2009). Value priorities as predictors of hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 294–298. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.016
30.
KeyesC. L. M.ShmotkinD.RyffC. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007
31.
KnafoA.SchwartzS. H. (2012). Relational identification with parents, parenting, and parent–child value similarity among adolescents. Family Science, 3, 13–21. doi:10.1080/19424620.2011.707794
32.
LavasaniM. G.BorhanzadehS.AfzaliL.HejaziE. (2011). The relationship between perceived parenting styles, social support with psychological well- being. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1852–1856. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.01
33.
MaccobyE. E.MartinJ. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In MussenP. H.HetheringtonE. M. (Eds.), Socialization, personality and social development (pp. 1–101). New York, NY: Wiley.
34.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self report, behavioral acts and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003
35.
MooreS. M.RosenthalD. A. (2014). Personal growth, grandmother engagement and satisfaction among non-custodial grandmothers. Aging and Mental Health, 19, 1–8. doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.920302
36.
NoriegaC.LópezJ.DomínguezR.VelascoC. (2017). Perceptions of grandparents who provide auxiliary care: Value transmission and child-rearing practices. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 1227–1236. doi:10.1111/cfs.12339
37.
NoriegaC.VelascoC.LópezJ. (2017). Confirmatory factor analysis of the values aspired for the future scale in grandparents. Educational Gerontology, 43, 248–258. doi:10.1080/03601277.2017.1283930
38.
Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ. E.AunolaK. (1998). Mothers’ and fathers’ well-being, parenting styles, and their children’s cognitive and behavioural strategies at primary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 543–556. doi:10.1007/BF03173104
39.
PereiraA. I. F.CanavarroM. C.CardosoM. F.MendonçaD. (2008). Patterns of parental rearing styles and child behaviour problems among portuguese school-aged children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 454–464. doi:10.1007/s10826-008-9249-3
40.
PinquartM. (2016). Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 475–493. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9338-y
41.
PinquartM.KauserR. (2018). Do the associations of parenting styles with behavior problems and academic achievement vary by culture? Results from a meta-analysis. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24, 75–100. doi:10.1037/cdp0000149
42.
PrattM. W.NorrisJ. E.CressmanK.LawfordH.HebblethwaiteS. (2008). Parents’ stories of grandparenting in the three-generational family: generativity, optimism and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 581–604. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00497.x
43.
RichaudM. C.MestreM. V.LemosV.TurA.GhiglioneM.SamperP. (2013). La influencia de la cultura en los estilos parentales en contextos de vulnerabilidad social [The influence of culture on parental styles in social vulnerability contexts]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 31, 419–431. Retrieved fromhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4459073
44.
RinaldiC. M.HoweN. (2012). Mothers’ and fathers’ parenting styles and associations with toddlers’ externalizing, internalizing, and adaptive behaviors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 266–276. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.001
45.
RobertoK. A.StroesJ. (1992). Grandchildren and grandparents: roles, influences and relationships. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 227–239. doi:10.2190/8CW7-91WF-E5QC-5UFN
46.
RobinsonC. C.MandlecoB.FrostS.HartC. H. (1995). Authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting practices: development of a new measure. Psychological Reports, 77, 819–830. doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.819
47.
RyffC. D. (1991). Possible selves in adulthood and old age: a tale of shifting horizons. Psychology and Aging, 6, 286–295. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.6.2.286
48.
RyffC. D.SingerB. H. (2006). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies9, 13–39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
49.
RyffC.SingerB. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
50.
SerratR.VillarF.GiulianiM. F.ZacarésJ. J. (2017). Older people’s participation in political organizations: The role of generativity and its impact on well-being. Educational Gerontology, 43, 128–138. doi:10.1080/03601277.2016.1269541
51.
StegerM. F.KashdanT. B.OishiS. (2009). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004
52.
TabuchiM.NakagawaT.MiuraA.GondoY. (2015). Generativity and interaction between the old and young: the role of perceived respect and perceived rejection. The Gerontologist, 55, 537–547. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt135
53.
TavassolieT.DuddingS.MadiganA. L.ThorvardarsonE.WinslerA. (2016). Differences in perceived parenting style between mothers and fathers: Implications for child outcomes and marital conflict. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 2055–2068. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0376-y
54.
TomásJ. M.MeléndezJ. C.NavarroE. (2008). Factorial confirmatory models of Ryff´s scales in a sample of elderly people. Psicothema, 20, 304–310. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=3465
55.
ToyamaM.FullerH.HektnerJ. M. (2018). Longitudinal psychosocial predictors for personal growth throught adulthood. Innovation on Aging, 2, 484. doi:10.1093/geroni/igy023.1807
56.
TriadóC.VillarF.CeldránM.SoléC. (2014). Grandparents who provide auxiliary care for their grandchildren: Satisfaction, difficulties, and impact on their health and well-being. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12, 113–127. doi:10.1080/15350770.2014.901102
57.
TriadóC.VillarF.SoléC.CeldránM. (2007). Construct validity of Ryff’s scale of psychological well-being in Spanish older adults. Psychological Reports, 100, 1151–1164. doi:10.2466/PR0.100.3.1151-1164
58.
UllmanJ. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 35–50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03
59.
ViguerP.MeléndezJ. C.ValenciaS.CanteroM. J.NavarroE. (2010). Grandparent-grandchild relationships from the children’s perspective: Shared activities and socialization styles. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 708–717. doi:10.1017/S1138741600002377
60.
VillarF. (2012). Successful ageing and development: The contribution of generativity in older age. Ageing and Society, 32, 1087–1105. doi:10.1017/S0144686X11000973
61.
VillarF.CeldránM.TriadóC. (2012). Grandmothers offering regular auxiliary care for their grandchildren: An expression of generativity in later life?Journal of Women & Aging, 24, 292–312. doi:10.1080/08952841.2012.708576
62.
VillarF.LópezO.CeldránM. (2013). La generatividad en la vejez y su relación con el bienestar: ¿Quién más contribuye es quien más se beneficia? [The generativity in old age and its relationship with well-being: Who contributes the most benefits the most?]. Anales de Psicología, 29, 897–906. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.145171
63.
VinkG.FrankL. E.PannekoekJ.van BuurenS. (2014). Predictive mean matching imputation of semicontinuous variables. Statistica Neerlandica, 68, 61–90. doi:10.1111/stan.12023
