Framed by family systems theory and social constructionism, the present study is the first to illuminate the experiences of immediate family members of estranged parent–child dyads. A thematic analysis of 27 immediate family members (13 siblings, 6 children, 4 spouses, and 4 parents of estranged parent–child dyads) revealed (a) 4 ways they discussed taking sides, (b) 3 messages that contributed to them feeling caught, and (c) 6 practices they engaged in to manage feeling caught. Findings suggest that immediate family members do not report feeling particularly agentic in the process and actively attempt to extract themselves from the parent–child conflict. Both theoretical implications and practical applications are discussed.
AbetzJ.WangT. R. (2017). “Were they ever really as happy the way I remember?”: Exploring sources of uncertainty for adult children of divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 58, 194–211. doi:10.1080/10502556.2017.1301158
2.
AfifiT. D. (2003). “Feeling caught” in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate privacy coordination rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 729–756. doi:10.1177/0265407503206002
3.
AfifiT. D.SchrodtP. (2003). ”Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents’ and young adults’ avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non-divorced households. Communication Monographs, 74, 78–102. doi:1080/03637750701196870
4.
AglliasK. (2011). No longer on speaking terms: The losses associated with family estrangement at the end of life. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 92, 107–113. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4055
5.
AglliasK. (2013). The gendered experience of family estrangement in later life. Journal of Women and Social Work, 28, 309–321. doi:10.1177/0886109913495727
6.
AglliasK. (2017). Family estrangement: A matter of perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
AmatoP. R.AfifiT. D. (2006). Feeling caught between parents: Adult children’s relations with parents and subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 222–235. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00243.x
8.
BlakeL. (2017). Parents and children who are estranged in adulthood: A review and discussion of the literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 521–536. doi:10.1111/jyfr.12216
9.
BlakeL.BlandB.ImrieS. (2019). The counseling experiencing of individuals who are estranged from a family member. Family Relations. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1111/fare.12385
10.
BlandB. (2018). It’s all about the money: The influence of family estrangement, accommodation struggles and homelessness on student success in UK higher education. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 20, 68–89. doi:10.5456/WPLL.20.3.68
11.
BowenM. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Aronson.
12.
BraithwaiteD. O.FosterE.BergenK. M. (2018). Social construction theory: Communication co-creating families. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. A.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 267–278). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
BraithwaiteD. O.TollerP. W.DaasK. L.DurhamW. T.JonesA. C. (2008). Centered but not caught in the middle: Stepchildren’s perceptions of dialectical contradictions in the communication of co-parents. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 33–55. doi:10.1080/00909880701799337
14.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
15.
CarrK.HolmanA.Stephenson-AbetzJ.Koenig KellasJ.VagnoniE. (2015). Giving voice to the silence of family estrangement: Comparing reasons of estranged parents and adult children in a nonmatched sample. Journal of Family Communication, 15, 130–140. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1013106
16.
ContiR. P. (2015). Family estrangement: Establishing a prevalence rate. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 3, 28–35. doi:10.15640/jpbs.v3n2a4
17.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Dorrance HallE. (2018). The communicative process of resilience for marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 307–328. doi:10.1177/0265407516683838
19.
FishM.BelskyJ.YoungbladeL. (1991). Developmental antecedents and measurement of intergenerational boundary violation in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 43, 278–297. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.4.3.278
20.
GanongL.ColemanM. (1994). Remarried family relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
GoldbergA. E.AllenK. R. (2013). Same-sex relationship dissolution and LGB stepfamily formation: Perspectives of young adults with LGB parents. Family Relations, 62, 529–544. doi:10.1111/fare.12024
22.
JacobvitzD. B.BushN. F. (1996). Reconstructions of family relationships: Parent-child alliances, personal distress, and self-esteem. Developmental Psychology, 32, 732–743. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.732
23.
KidderL. H. (1981). Qualitative research and quasi-experimental frameworks. In BrewerB.CollinsB. (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 380–382). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
KitzmannK. M. (2000). Effects of marital conflict on subsequent triadic family interactions and parenting. Developmental Psychology, 36, 3–13. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.3
25.
LangellierK. M. (1989). Personal narratives: Perspectives on theory and research. Text and Performance Quarterly, 9, 243–276. doi:10.1080/10462938909365938
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
OwenW. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
28.
PetronioS. (1999). The ramifications of a reluctant confidant. In RichardsA. C.SchumrumT. (Eds.), Invitations to dialogue: The legacy of Sidney M. Jourard (pp. 113–150). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
29.
ScharpK. M. (2016). Parent-child estrangement: Conditions for disclosure and perceived social network member reactions. Family Relations, 65, 688–700. doi:10.1111/fare.12219
30.
ScharpK. M. (2019). “You’re not welcome here”: A grounded theory of family distancing. Communication Research, 46, 427–455. doi:10.1177/0093650217715542
31.
ScharpK. M.Dorrance HallE. (2017). Family marginalization, alienation, and estrangement: A review of and call for research that questions the nonvoluntary status of family relationships. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 28–45. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1285680
32.
ScharpK. M.Dorrance HallE. (2019). Reconsidering family closeness: A review and call for research on family distancing. Journal of Family Communication, 19, 1–14. doi:10.1080/15267431.2018.1544563
33.
ScharpK. M.McLarenR. M. (2018). Uncertainty issues and management in adult children’s stories of their estrangement with their parents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 811–830. doi:10.1177/0265407517699097
34.
ScharpK. M.ThomasL. J. (2016). Family “bonds”: Making meaning of parent-child relationships in estrangement narratives. Journal of Family Communication, 16, 32–50. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1111215
35.
ScharpK. M.ThomasL. J. (2018). Making meaning of the parent-child relationship: A dialogic analysis of parent-initiated estrangement narratives. Journal of Family Communication, 18, 302–316. doi:10.1080/15267431.2018.1484747
36.
ScharpK. M.ThomasL. J.PaxmanC. G. (2015). “It was the straw that broke the camel’s back”: Exploring the distancing processes communicatively constructed in parent-child estrangement backstories. Journal of Family Communication, 15, 330–348. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1076422
37.
SchrodtP.AfifiT. D. (2007). Communication processes that predict adults’ feelings of being caught and their associations with mental health and family satisfaction. Communication Monographs, 74, 200–228. doi:10.1080/0363775-7-1390085
38.
ThorsonA. (2014). Feeling caught: Adult children’s experiences with parental infidelity. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 15, 75–83. doi:10.1080/17459435.2014.955595
39.
VuchinichS.EmeryR. E.CassidyJ. (1988). Family members as third parties in dyadic family conflict: Strategies, alliances, and outcomes. Child Development, 59, 1293–1302. doi:10.2307/1130492
40.
YangH.van de VliertE.JehnK. (2018). A psychological approach to third-party side-taking in interpersonal conflicts. Organizational Psychological Review, 8, 174–191. doi:10.1177/2041386618798430
41.
YoshimuraC. G.GalvinK. M. (2018). General systems theory: A compelling view of family life. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. A.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 164–174). New York, NY: Routledge.
