To understand the process of relational turbulence and psychological distress in the context of the military, we used a grounded theory approach to analyze individuals’ experiences in online forums. Analyses revealed a process by which perceived changes in individuals’ romantic partners or their relationships and suspicions of infidelity led to a cycle of turmoil. Participants reported a tension between caring for their partner and upsetting experiences and relational transgressions, which contributed to them feeling caught in the cycle. In addition to feeling conflicted, the cycle of turmoil also encompassed relational turbulence, psychological distress, and fighting between partners. The conceptual model identified in this study has implications for both theory and practice, including underscoring the importance of relational turbulence theory and identifying feeling conflicted as a potentially viable point of intervention.
AllenE. S.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2010). Hitting home: Relationships between recent deployment, post traumatic stress symptoms, and marital functioning for army couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 280–288. doi:10.1037/a0019405
2.
AronsonE. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303–311. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_1
3.
BakhurstM. G.LoewB.McGuireA. C. L.HalfordW. K.MarkmanH. J. (2017). Relationship education for military couples: Recommendations for best practice. Family Process, 56, 302–316. doi:10.1111/famp.12211
4.
BasingerE. D.KnoblochL. K. (2018). A grounded theory of online coping by parents of military service members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 702–721. doi:10.1177/0265407517694769
5.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BikeD. H.NorcrossJ. C.SchatzD. M. (2009). Processes and outcomes of psychotherapists’ personal therapy: Replication and extension 20 years later. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46, 19–31. doi:10.1037/a0015139
7.
BlaisureK. R.Saathoff-WellsT.PereiraA.WadsworthS. M.DombroA. L. (2012). Serving military families in the 21st century. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
8.
BlakelyG.HennessyC.ChungM. C.SkirtonH. (2014). Adaption and adjustment of military spouses to overseas postings: An online forum study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 16, 387–394. doi:10.1111/nhs.12122
9.
BlumerH. (1954). What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10. doi:10.2307/2088165
10.
BossP. G. (2006). Loss, trauma, and resilience: Therapeutic work with ambiguous loss. New York, NY: Norton.
11.
BowenG. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301
12.
BowenG. LMartinJ. A.ManciniJ. A. (2013). The resilience of military families: Theoretical perspectives. In FineM. A.FinchamF. D. (Eds.), Handbook of family theories: A content-based approach (pp. 417–436). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CampbellS. B.RenshawK. D. (2013). PTSD symptoms, disclosure, and relationship distress: Explorations of mediation and associations over time. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 494–502. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.06.007
14.
CarterS. P.OsborneL. J.RenshawK. D.AllenE. S.LoewB. A.MarkmanH. J.StanleyS. M. (2018). Something to talk about: Topics of conversation between romantic partners during military deployments. Journal of Family Psychology, 32, 22–30. doi:10.1037/fam0000373
15.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
DaileyR. M. (2016). On-again/off-again relationships. In BergerC. R.RoloffM. E. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1188–1193). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
DurhamW. T. (2008). The rules-based process of revealing/concealing the family planning decisions of voluntarily child-free couples: A communication privacy management perspective. Communication Studies, 59, 132–147. doi:10.1080/10510970802062451
18.
FaberA. J.WillertonE.ClymerS. R.MacDermidS. M.WeissH. M. (2008). Ambiguous absence, ambiguous presence: A qualitative study of military reserve families in wartime. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 222–230. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.222
19.
FrisbyB. N.ByrnesK.ManssonD. H.Booth-ButterfieldM.BirminghamM. K. (2011). Topic avoidance, everyday talk, and stress in romantic military and non-military couples. Communication Studies, 62, 241–257. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.553982
20.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC. (2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711–723. doi:10.1177/0146167202289001
21.
HighA. C.SolomonD. H. (2011). Locating computer-mediated social support within online communication environments. In WrightK. B.WebbL. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 119–136). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
22.
HogeC. W.RiviereL. A.WilkJ. E.HerrellR. K.WeathersF. W. (2014). The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in US combat soldiers: A head-to-head comparison of DSM-5 versus DSM-IV-TR symptom criteria with the PTSD checklist. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 269–277. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70235-4
23.
Jennings-KelsallV.AloiaL. S.SolomonD. H.MarshallA. D.LeifkerF. R. (2012). Stressors experienced by women within Marine Corps families: A qualitative study of discourse within an online forum. Military Psychology, 24, 363–381. doi:10.1080/08995605.2012.695255
24.
JosephA. L.AfifiT. D. (2010). Military wives’ stressful disclosures to their deployed husbands: The role of protective buffering. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 412–434. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.513997
25.
KarneyB. R.CrownJ. S. (2007). Families under stress: An assessment of data, theory, and research on marriage and divorce in the military. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
26.
KnoblochL. K.BasingerE. D.AbendscheinB.WehrmanE. C.MonkJ. K.McAninchK. G. (2018). Communication in online forums about the experience and management of relational uncertainty in military life. Journal of Family Communication, 18, 13–31. doi:10.1080/15267431.2017.1373355
27.
KnoblochL. K.EbataA. T.McGlaughlinP. C.OgolskyB. (2013). Depressive symptoms, relational turbulence, and the reintegration difficulty of military couples following wartime deployment. Health Communication, 28, 754–766. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.800440
28.
KnoblochL. K.EbataA. T.McGlaughlinP. C.TheissJ. A. (2013). Generalized anxiety and relational uncertainty as predictors of topic avoidance during reintegration following military deployment. Communication Monographs, 80, 452–477. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.828159
29.
KnoblochL. K.Knobloch-FeddersL. M.YorgasonJ. B. (2018). Communication of military couples during deployment predicting generalized anxiety upon reunion. Journal of Family Psychology, 32, 12–21. doi:10.1037/fam0000344
30.
KnoblochL. K.McAninchK. G.AbendscheinB.EbataA. T.McGlaughlinP. C. (2016). Relational turbulence among military couples after reunion following deployment. Personal Relationships, 23, 742–758. doi:10.1111/pere.12148
31.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50, 261–278. doi:10.1080/10510979909388499
32.
KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A. (2011). Depressive symptoms and mechanisms of relational turbulence as predictors of relationship satisfaction among returning service members. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 470–478. doi:10.1037/a0024063
33.
KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A. (2012). Experiences of U.S. military couples during the post-deployment transition: Applying the relational turbulence model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 423–450. doi:10.1177/0265407511431186
34.
KnoblochL. K.WilsonS. R. (2015). Communication in military families across the deployment cycle. In TurnerL. H.WestR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family communication (pp. 370–385). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
36.
McAninchK. G.WehrmanE. C.AbendscheinB. (2018). Identifying sequences of advice-giving in online military discussion forums. Communication Quarterly, 66, 557–575. doi:10.1080/01463373.2018.1473456
37.
MerollaA. J. (2010). Relational maintenance during military deployment: Perspectives of wives of deployed US soldiers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 4–26. doi:10.1080/00909880903483557
38.
MonkJ. K.Nelson GoffB. S. (2014). Military couples’ trauma disclosure: Moderating between trauma symptoms and relationship quality. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6, 537–545. doi:10.1037/a0036788
39.
MonkJ. K.RuhlmannL. J.Nelson GoffB. S.OgolskyB. G. (2018). Brief-systemic programs for promoting mental health and relationship functioning in military couples and families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 566–586. doi:10.1111/jftr.12280
40.
NewbyJ. H.McCarrollJ. E.UrsanoR. J.FanZ.ShigemuraJ.Tucker-HarrisY. (2005). Positive and negative consequences of a military deployment. Military Medicine, 170, 815–819. doi:10.7205/MILMED.170.10.815
41.
OgolskyB. G.SurraC. A.MonkJ. K. (2016). Pathways of commitment to wed: The development and dissolution of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 293–310. doi:10.1111/jomf.12260
42.
OlsonD. H. (1977). Insiders’ and outsiders’ views of relationships: Research studies. In LevingerG.RaushH. L. (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy (pp. 115–135). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
43.
PonderW. N.AguirreR. T. P. (2012). Internet-based spousal communication during deployment: Does it increase post-deployment marital satisfaction. Advances in Social Work, 13, 216–228. doi:10.18060/1867
44.
RainsS. A.WrightK. B. (2016). Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-art review and agenda for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40, 175–211. doi:10.1080/23808985.2015.11735260
45.
ReaJ.BehnkeA.HuffN.AllenK. (2015). The role of online communication in the lives of military spouses. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37, 329–339. doi:10.1007/s10591-015-9346-6
46.
RedmondS. A.WilcoxS. L.CampbellS.KimA.FinneyK.BarrK.HassanA. M. (2015). A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work, 50, 9–20. doi:10.3233/WOR-141987
47.
RennieD. L.PhillipsJ. R.QuartaroG. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 29, 139–150. doi:10.1037/h0079765
48.
RenshawK. D.CampbellS. B. (2011). Combat veterans’ symptoms of PTSD and partners’ distress: The role of partners’ perceptions of veterans’ deployment experiences. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 953–962. doi:10.1037/a0025871
49.
Sahlstein ParcellE.MaguireK. C. (2014). Turning points and trajectories in military deployment. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 129–148. doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.864293
50.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. doi:10.1177/0265407504047838
51.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A.McLarenR. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42, 507–532. doi:10.1111/hcre.12091
52.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
53.
TaftC. T.WatkinsL. E.StaffordJ.StreetA. E.MonsonC. M. (2011). Posttraumatic stress disorder and intimate relationship problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 22–33. doi:10.1037/a0022196
54.
TheissJ. A.KnoblochL. K. (2014). Relational turbulence and the post-deployment transition: Self, partner, and relationship focused turbulence. Communication Research, 41, 27–51. doi:10.1177/0093650211429285
55.
TollefsonT. T. (2008). Supporting spouses during a military deployment. Family and Community Health, 31, 281–286. doi:10.1097/01.FCH.0000336091.31442.44
56.
WickS.Nelson GoffB. S. (2014). A qualitative analysis of military couples with high and low trauma symptoms and relationship distress levels. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 13, 63–88. doi:10.1080/15332691.2014.865983
57.
WilsonH. M. N.MurrayC. D. (2016). The experience of deployment for partners of military personnel: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15, 102–120. doi:10.1080/15332691.2014.986699
58.
WilsonS. R.GettingsP. E.Dorrance HallE.PastorR. G. (2015). Dilemmas families face in talking with returning U.S. military service members about seeking professional help for mental health issues. Health Communication, 30, 772–783. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.899659
59.
WilsonS. R.MariniC. M.FranksM. M.WhitemanS. D.ToppD. B.MacDermid WadsworthS. (2017). Communication and connection during deployment: A daily-diary study from the perspective of at-home partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 32, 42–48. doi:10.1037/fam0000333
60.
WrightK. B.RainsS. A. (2013). Weak-tie support network preference, health-related stigma, and health outcomes in computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41, 309–324. doi:10.1080/00909882.2013.792435
61.
WrightK. B.RainsS.BanasJ. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 606–624. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01505.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
