People’s mindsets and goals regarding social relationships affect their relationship quality and psychological well-being. We employed multiple group path modeling to examine how perceived relational mobility affects mental and physical health through relationship mindsets (destiny and growth mindsets) and relationship goals (approach and avoidance goals) across countries, surveying community adults in the U.S. (n = 206; Mage = 39.14; 48% female) and South Korea (n = 236; Mage = 38.89; 51% female) through online questionnaires. Results showed that stronger growth mindsets and approach goals predicted better mental and physical health, whereas stronger destiny mindsets and avoidance goals predicted poorer mental and physical health in both countries. Moreover, higher levels of relational mobility were linked to higher levels of subjective well-being and fewer depressive symptoms via growth mindsets and approach goals. The results provide evidence for the importance of socioecological factors such as relational mobility in influencing relationship mindsets and goals with eventual consequences for health outcomes.
BurnetteJ. L.FraniukR. (2010). Individual differences in implicit theories of relationships and partner fit: Predicting forgiveness in developing relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 144–148. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.09.011
4.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2011). Interpersonal goals, others’ regard for the self, and self-esteem: The paradoxical consequences of self-image and compassionate goals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 422–434. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.808
5.
ChiuC. Y.HongY. Y.DweckC. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
6.
ChoiI.KooM.ChoiJ. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691–705. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298568
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
9.
DicksonJ. M.MacLeodA. K. (2004). Approach and avoidance goals and plans: Their relationship to anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 415–432. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000031809.20488.ee
10.
DienerE.DienerM.DienerC. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851
DweckC. S.ChiuC. Y.HongY. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
ElliotA. J.GableS. L.MapesR. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 378–391. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282153
15.
ElliotA. J.SheldonK. M. (1998). Avoidance personal goals and the personality–illness relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1282–1299. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1282
16.
FlynnM.KecmanovicJ.AlloyL. B. (2010). An examination of integrated cognitive–interpersonal vulnerability to depression: The role of rumination, perceived social support, and interpersonal stress generation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 456–466. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9300-8
17.
FraniukR.PomerantzE. M.CohenD. (2004). The causal role of theories of relationships: Consequences for satisfaction and cognitive strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1494–1507.
GoldbergD. P.WilliamsP. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
20.
HaimovitzK.DweckC. S. (2017). The origins of children’s growth and fixed mindsets: New research and a new proposal. Child Development, 88, 1849–1859. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955
21.
HolmS. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
22.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2017). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437–458. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902
23.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.TaylorS. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63, 518–526. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X
24.
KitoM.YukiM.ThomsonR. (2017). Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross-cultural differences. Personal Relationships, 24, 114–130. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pere.12174
25.
KneeC. R.CanevelloA. (2006). Implicit theories of relationships and coping in romantic relationships. In VohsK. D.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 160–176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.LonsbaryC. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3
27.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.VietorN. A.NeighborsC. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 617–628. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262853
28.
KusterM.BackesS.BrandstätterV.NussbeckF. W.BradburyT. N.Sutter-StickelD.BodenmannG. (2017). Approach-avoidance goals and relationship problems, communication of stress, and dyadic coping in couples. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 576–590. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9629-3
29.
LiL. M. W.AdamsG.KurtişT.HamamuraT. (2015). Beware of friends: The cultural psychology of relational mobility and cautious intimacy. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 124–133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12091
30.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT.LeeH. (2018). Low relational mobility leads to greater motivation to understand enemies but not friends and acquaintances. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 43–60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12216
31.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
LouN. M.LiL. M. W. (2017). Interpersonal relationship mindsets and rejection sensitivity across cultures: The role of relational mobility. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 200–206. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.004
33.
LouN. M.NoelsK. A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.03.004
34.
LouN. M.NoelsK. A. (2017). Sensitivity to language-based rejection in intercultural communication: The role of language mindsets and implications for migrants’ cross-cultural adaptation. Applied Linguistics. Advanced online publication. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx047
35.
LovingT. J.SlatcherR. (2013). Romantic relationships and health. In SimpsonJ.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 617–637). New York, NY: Oxford.
36.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405–416. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
37.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
38.
MattinglyB. A.McIntyreK. P.KneeC. R.LovingT. J. (2018). Implicit theories of relationships and self-expansion: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advanced online publication. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407518768079
39.
McGeeD. L.LiaoY.CaoG.CooperR. S. (1999). Self-reported health status and mortality in a multiethnic US cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149, 41–46. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009725
40.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
41.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
42.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2005). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
43.
Nolen-HoeksemaS.LarsonJ.GraysonC. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1061–1072. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1061
44.
NorasakkunkitV.KitayamaS.UchidaY. (2012). Social anxiety and holistic cognition: Self-focused social anxiety in the United States and other-focused social anxiety in Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 742–757. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022111405658
OishiS.GrahamJ. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 356–377. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374588
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
48.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
49.
RyderA. G.YangJ.ZhuX.YaoS.YiJ.HeineS. J.BagbyR. M. (2008). The cultural shaping of depression: Somatic symptoms in China, psychological symptoms in North America?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 300–313. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.300
50.
SatoK.YukiM. (2014). The association between self-esteem and happiness differs in relationally mobile vs. stable interpersonal contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1113. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01113
51.
SchugJ.YukiM.HorikawaH.TakemuraK. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95–103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01277.x
52.
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21, 1471–1478. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786
53.
ThoemmesF.MacKinnonD. P.ReiserM. R. (2010). Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 510–534. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.489379
54.
Van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
55.
van WijkC. M. G.HuismanH.KolkA. M. (1999). Gender differences in physical symptoms and illness behavior: A health diary study. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 1061–1074. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00196-3
56.
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
57.
YukiM.SchugJ. (2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In GillathO.AdamsG.KunkelA. (Eds.), Relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 137–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
