In the context of an increasingly egalitarian society, in which all genders are encouraged to be vocal about their goals and take equal growth opportunities, goal interdependence in couples has been repeatedly associated with relationship satisfaction. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide evidence for the association between goal interdependence and relationship satisfaction in couples. We performed a random-effects analysis for the 32 reports and 49 independent samples that investigated three types of goal interdependence (goal support, goal congruence, and goal conflict) in association with relationship satisfaction. We found significant medium effect sizes between goal interdependence in general (r = .23) and relationship satisfaction, as well as between each type of goal interdependence and relationship satisfaction. The strongest effect size emerged for the association between goal congruence and relationship satisfaction (r = .43), followed by the association between goal support and relationship satisfaction (r = .28) and by the negative association between goal conflict and relationship satisfaction (r = −.29). From a theoretical standpoint, these results provide support for a key claim from the Transactive Goal Dynamics Theory that goal coordination between partners impacts relationship functioning. From a practical standpoint, they emphasize the need to consider goal interdependence in couples’ therapy, particularly in the current sociocultural context.
AdachiP.WilloughbyT. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.963549
2.
ArchuletaK. L.GrableJ. E.BrittS. L. (2010). Shared goals and values: Towards an understanding of financial and marital satisfaction. Proceedings of the Eastern Family Economics and Resource Management Association.
3.
ArchuletaK. L.GrableJ. E.BrittS. L. (2013). Financial and relationship satisfaction as a function of harsh start-up and shared goals and values. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 24(1), 3-14.
4.
AviviY. E.LaurenceauJ.-P.CarverC. S. (2009). Linking relationship quality to perceived mutuality of relationship goals and perceived goal progress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.2.137.
5.
BerliC.BolgerN.ShroutP. E.StadlerG.ScholzU. (2018). Interpersonal processes of couples’ daily support for goal pursuit: The example of physical activity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739264
6.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. (2013). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3. Biostat
7.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley
8.
BriskinJ. L.KopetzC. E.FitzsimonsG. M.SlatcherR. B. (2019). For better or for worse? Outsourcing self-regulation and goal pursuit. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617736112
9.
BrittonM.HaddadS.DerrickJ. L. (2019). Perceived partner responsiveness predicts smoking cessation in single-smoker couples. Addictive Behaviors, 88, 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.026.
10.
BrockR. L.LawrenceE. (2009). Too much of a good thing: Underprovision versus overprovision of partner support. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(2), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015402.
11.
BrunsteinJ. C.DangelmayerG.SchultheissO. C. (1996). Personal goals and social support in close relationships: Effects on relationship mood and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 1006-1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.1006.
12.
BühlerJ. L.WeidmannR.KumashiroM.GrobA. (2018). Does Michelangelo care about age? An adult life-span perspective on the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1392-1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518766698.
13.
CappuzzelloA. C.GereJ. (2018). Can you make my goals easier to achieve? Effects of partner instrumentality on goal pursuit and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 25(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12238
14.
CarbonneauN.MartosT.SallayV.RochetteS.KoestnerR. (2019). Examining the associations of autonomy and directive support given and received with relationship satisfaction in the context of goals that romantic partners have for one another. Motivation and Emotion, 43(6), 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09792-8
15.
CarbonneauN.MilyavskayaM. (2017). Your goals or mine? Women’s personal and vicarious eating regulation goals and their partners’ perceptions of support, well-being, and relationship quality. Motivation and Emotion, 41(4), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9623-9.
16.
ChuaS. N. (2015). Just tell me what to do: Goal instrumentality moderates the effect of support on relationship quality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(7), 773-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615585830.
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) L. Erlbaum Associates
18.
Da SilvaS. M.BoivinJ.GameiroS. (2016). Self-regulation and wellbeing when facing a blocked parenthood goal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One, 11(6), e0157649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157649
19.
DaileyR. M. (2018). Strategies in context: How perceptions of romantic partner support for weight loss vary by the relational context. Health Communication, 34(10), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1461584.
20.
de MontignyF.MeunierS.CloutierL.TremblayG.CoulombeS.AugerN.RoyB.GabouryI.BernardF.-O.LavoieB.DionH.HouleJ. (2016). Spousal positive social control and men’s health behaviors and self-efficacy: The influence of age and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(5), 753-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516658362.
21.
EmeryL. F.GardnerW. L.FinkelE. J.CarswellK. L. (2017). You’ve changed”: Low self-concept clarity predicts lack of support for partner change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 318-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739263.
22.
FalconierM. K.JacksonJ. B.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002.
23.
FeeneyB. C.Van VleetM.JakubiakB. K.TomlinsonJ. M. (2017). Predicting the pursuit and support of challenging life opportunities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(8), 1171-1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217708575.
24.
FinkelE. J.FitzsimonsG. M.VandellenM. R. (2016). Self-regulation as a transactive process. Reconceptualizing the unit of analysis for goal setting, pursuit, and outcomes. In VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory, and applications (3rd ed., pp. 264–282). The Guilford Press
25.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2018). Transactive-goal-dynamics theory: A discipline-wide perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417754199
26.
FivecoatH. C.TomlinsonJ. M.AronA.CaprarielloP. A. (2015). Partner support for individual self-expansion opportunities: Effects on relationship satisfaction in long-term couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514533767
27.
GereJ. (2012). The role of goal congruence in relationship quality and subjective wellbeing. [Doctoral dissertation], University of Toronto
28.
GereJ.AlmeidaD. M.MartireL. M. (2016). The effects of lack of joint goal planning on divorce over 10 years. Plos One, 11(9), e0163543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163543
29.
GereJ.ImpettE. A. (2017). Shifting priorities: Effects of partners’ goal conflict on goal adjustment processes and relationship quality in developing romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(6), 793-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517698851.
30.
GereJ.SchimmackU. (2013). When romantic partners’ goals conflict: Effects on relationship quality and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9314-2
31.
GereJ.SchimmackU.PinkusR. T.LockwoodP. (2011). The effects of romantic partners’ goal congruence on affective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.010
32.
GrayJ. S.ConsJ. V. (2017). Trait and goal similarity and discrepancy in romantic couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.024.
33.
HaddenB. W.SmithC. V.WebsterG. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality: Meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 42–58.
34.
HawkinsA. J.WilloughbyB. J.DohertyW. J. (2012). Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53(6), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.682898
35.
HenryS. L.RookK. S.StephensM. A.FranksM. M. (2013). Spousal undermining of older diabetic patients’ disease management. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(12), 1550-1561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105312465913.
36.
HigginsJ. P.ThomsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj: British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
37.
HoppmannC. A.GerstorfD. (2013). Spousal goals, affect quality, and collaborative problem solving: Evidence from a time-sampling study with older couples. Research in Human Development, 10(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2013.760260
38.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2016). Daily goal progress is facilitated by spousal support and promotes psychological, physical, and relational well-being throughout adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000062
39.
KindtS.GoubertL.De RuddereL.CanoA.VansteenkisteM. (2020). What should I do first?” The effect of manipulated goal conflict on affect, motivation, and helping behavior in chronic pain couples. The journal of pain. 21(11–12), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2020.01.009
40.
KoestnerR.PowersT. A.CarbonneauN.MilyavskayaM.ChuaS. N. (2012). Distinguishing autonomous and directive forms of goal support: Their effects on goal progress, relationship quality, and subjective well-being. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457075
41.
MadeyS. F.RodgersL. (2009). The effect of attachment and sternberg’s triangular theory of love on relationship satisfaction. Individual Differences Research, 7(2), 76–84
42.
MoldenD. C.LucasG. M.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM.RusbultC. (2009). Perceived support for promotion-focused and prevention-focused goals: Associations with well-being in unmarried and married couples. Psychological Science, 20(7), 787–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02362.x
43.
MorelliS. A.LeeI. A.ArnnM. E.ZakiJ. (2015). Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion, 15(4), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000084
44.
National Center for Health Statistics (U.S). (2012). First marriages in the United States; data from the 2006-2010 national survey of family growth. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/12055
45.
OrehekE.ForestA. L.BarbaroN. (2018). A people-as-means approach to interpersonal relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617744522
46.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210383045
47.
ParkE. W.TudiverF.SchultzJ. K.CampbellT. (2004). Does enhancing partner support and interaction improve smoking cessation? A meta-analysis. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(2), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.64
48.
PilkingtonP. D.MilneL. C.CairnsK. E.LewisJ.WhelanT. A. (2015). Modifiable partner factors associated with perinatal depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 178, 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.02.023.
49.
SwindleR.JrHellerK.PescosolidoB.KikuzawaS. (2000). Responses to nervous breakdowns in America over a 40-year period: Mental health policy implications. American Psychologist, 55(7), 740–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.740
50.
TomlinsonJ. M.FeeneyB. C.PetersB. J. (2020). Growing into retirement: Longitudinal evidence for the importance of partner support for self-expansion. Psychology and Aging, 35(7), 1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000560
51.
Van GenugtenL.DusseldorpE.MasseyE. K.van EmpelenP. (2017). Effective self-regulation change techniques to promote mental wellbeing among adolescents: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 11(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1252934
WaddellN.OverallN. C.ChangV. T.HammondM. D. (2020). Gendered division of labor during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for relationship problems and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1759–1781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996476
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
