This study examined the role of dyadic power, marital status, and face concerns in shaping the politeness strategies dating and married partners use to express complaints toward one another. Two hundred sixty-one romantically involved individuals completed a survey through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Power was a more salient predictor of politeness strategies for dating than for married individuals, and concern for partners’ face (but not one’s own) mediated several of the associations between power and complaint strategies.
AlbertsJ. K.DriscollG. (1992). Containment versus escalation: The trajectory of couples’ conversational complaints. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 394–412. doi:10.1080/10570319209374425
2.
Blum-KulkaS.DanetB.GhersonR. (1985). The language of requesting in Israeli society. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 113–139). New York: Springer.
3.
BollenK. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
4.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR. L.HustonT. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). New York: Academic Press.
5.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
7.
CanaryD. J.CupachW. R. (1988). Relational and episodic characteristics associated with conflict tactics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 305–325. doi:10.1177/0265407588053003
8.
CraigR. T.TracyK.SpisakF. (1986). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12, 437–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00087.x
9.
CupachW. R. (2007). “You’re bugging me!”: Complaints and criticism from a partner. In SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 143–168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
11.
DillardJ. P.WilsonS. R.TusingK. J.KinneyT. A. (1997). Politeness judgments in personal relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 297–325. doi:10.1177/0261927x970163003
12.
DunbarN. E. (2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235–248. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0403&4_8
13.
DunbarN. E.AbraG. (2010). Observations of dyadic power in interpersonal interaction. Communication Monographs, 77, 657–684. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.520018
14.
DunbarN. E.BippusA. M.YoungS. L. (2008). Interpersonal dominance in relational conflict: A view from dyadic power theory. Interpersona, 2(1), 1–33. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v2i1.16
15.
DunbarN. E.BurgoonJ. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233. doi:10.1177/0265407505050944
16.
DunbarN. E.JohnsonA. J. (2015). A test of dyadic power theory: Control attempts recalled from interpersonal interactions with romantic partners, family members, and friends. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4, 42–62. doi:10.1075/jaic.4.1.03dun
17.
HanB.CaiD. A. (2009). Face goals in apology: A cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and U.S. Americans. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 20, 101–123. doi:10.1075/japc.20.1.06han
18.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360
19.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
21.
HoltgravesT.YangJ. (1990). Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 719–729. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.719
22.
HoltgravesT.YangJ. N. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246–256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.246
23.
HortonJ. J.ChiltonL. B. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Cambridge, MA, 7–11 June 2010. doi:10.1145/1807342.1807376
24.
KeesJ.BerryC.BurtonS.SheehanK. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46, 141–155. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
25.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
26.
KowalskiR. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179–196. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.119.2.179
27.
LiuE.RoloffM. E. (2015). Exhausting silence: Emotional costs of withholding complaints. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8, 25–40. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12043
28.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1023/a:1024649822872
29.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023–1031. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
30.
PreacherK. J.ZhangG.KimC.MelsG. (2013). Choosing the optimal number of factors in exploratory factor analysis: A model selection perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 28–56. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.710386
31.
RollinsB. C.BahrS. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 619–627. doi:10.2307/350682
32.
RoloffM. E.ClovenD. H. (1990). The chilling effect in interpersonal relationships: The reluctance to speak one’s mind. In CahnD. (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
RoloffM. E.IfertD. E. (2000). Conflict management through avoidance: Withholding complaints, suppressing arguments, and declaring topics taboo. In PetronioS. (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 151–163). New York: Psychology Press.
34.
RusbultC. E.JohnsonD. J.MorrowG. D. (1986). Determinants and consequences of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in adult romantic involvements. Human Relations, 39, 45–63. doi:10.1177/001872678603900103
35.
SampJ. A.SolomonD. H. (1998). Communicative responses to problematic events in close relationships I: The variety and facets of goals. Communication Research, 25, 66–95. doi:10.1177/009365098025001003
36.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. doi:10.1177/0265407504047838
37.
SolomonD. H.SampJ. A. (1998). Power and problem appraisal: Perceptual foundations of the chilling effect in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 191–209. doi:10.1177/0265407598152004
38.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K.FitzpatrickM. A. (2004). Relational power, marital schema, and decisions to withhold complaints: An investigation of the chilling effect on confrontation in marriage. Communication Studies, 55, 146–167. doi:10.1080/10510970409388610
39.
StewartN.UngemachC.HarrisA. J. L.BartelsD. M.NewellB. R.PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2015). The average laboratory samples a population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 479–491. Retrieved fromhttp://journal.sjdm.org/.
40.
TheissJ. A.SolomonD. H. (2006). A relational turbulence model of communication about irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 33, 391–418. doi:10.1177/0093650206291482
41.
TreesA. R.ManusovV. (1998). Managing face concerns in criticism: Integrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Human Communication Research, 24, 564–583. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00431.x
42.
WorleyT. R.SampJ. A. (2016a). Complaint avoidance and complaint-related appraisals in close relationships: A Dyadic Power Theory perspective. Communication Research, 43, 391–413. doi:10.1177/0093650214538447
43.
WorleyT. R.SampJ. A. (2016b). Gendered associations of decision-making power, topic avoidance, and relational satisfaction: A differential influence model. Communication Reports, 29, 1–12. doi:10.1080/08934215.2015.1025988
