Grounded in communicated narrative sense-making (CNSM) and resilience theorizing, the current study investigated the effects of mother-daughter communication on young adult women’s (n = 60) narrative construction of resilience over time. Participants wrote stories of difficult experiences at Time 1, discussed the story with their mother in a research lab two days later, and wrote the story again at Time 2. Inductive analyses of daughters’ stories revealed four themes of resilience: acknowledging the struggle, taking action, seeking silver lining, and finding strength in others. Mother-daughter interactions were analyzed for CNSM behaviors—engagement, turn-taking, perspective-taking, and coherence. Mother-daughter coherence and engagement illuminated differences in daughters’ themes of resilience, and all CNSM behaviors positively related to daughters’ increased narrative resilience over time. Findings demonstrated the effect of mother-daughter interaction on young adult women’s resilience, suggesting that CNSM contributes to the meaning-making component of resilience. Implications for advancing CNSM and resilience theorizing are explored.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4.
BuzzanellP. M. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60, 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01469.x
5.
CarrK. (2012). Examining the role of family and marital communication in understanding resilience to family-of-origin adversity. Unpublished dissertation from theUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
6.
CoutuD. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80, 46–55.
7.
Dorrance HallE. (2016). The communicative process of resilience for marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships[online publication first] doi:10.1177/02654075166838838
FrattaroliJ. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 823–865. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823
10.
HauserS. T.GoldenE.AllenJ. P. (2006). Narrative in the study of resilience. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 61, 205–227. doi:10.1080/00797308.2006.11800771
11.
HaverfieldM. C.TheissJ. A. (2016). Parent’s alcoholism severity and family topic avoidance about alcohol as predictors of perceived stigma among adult children of alcoholics: Implications for emotional and psychological resilience. Health Communication, 31, 606–616. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.981665
12.
HorstmanH. K.MaliskiR.HaysA.CoxJ.EnderleA.NelsonL. R. (2016). Unfolding narrative meaning over time: The cognitive and communicative components of narrative sense-making and well-being in mother-daughter conversations of difficulty. Communication Monographs, 83, 326–348. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1068945
13.
KenyonG. M.RandallW. L. (1997). Restorying our lives: Personal growth through autobiographical reflection. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
14.
Koenig KellasJ. (2018). Communicated narrative sense-making theory: Linking storytelling and well-being. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. A.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (2nd ed., pp. 62–74). New York: Routledge.
15.
Koenig KellasJ.Kranstuber HorstmanH. (2015). Communicated narrative sense-making: Understanding family narratives, storytelling, and the construction of meaning through a communicative lens. In TurnerL. H.WestR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family communication (2nd ed., pp. 76–90). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
Koenig KellasJ.Kranstuber HorstmanH.WillerE.CarrK. (2015). The benefits and risks of telling and listening to stories of difficulty over time: Experimentally testing the expressive writing paradigm in the context of interpersonal communication between friends. Health Communication, 30, 843–858. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.850017
17.
Koenig KellasJ.ManusovV. (2003). What’s in a story? The relationship between narrative completeness and tellers’ adjustment to relationship dissolution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 285–307. doi:10.1177/0265407503020003002
18.
Koenig KellasJ.TreesA. R. (2005). Rating interactional sense-making in the process of joint storytelling. In ManusovV. (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 281–294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Koenig KellasJ.TreesA. R. (2006). Finding meaning in difficult family experiences: Sense-making and interaction processes during joint family storytelling. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 49–76. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0601_4
20.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
LangellierK. M.PetersonE. E. (1992). Spinstorying: An analysis of women storytelling. In FineE. C.SpeerJ. H. (Eds.), Performance, culture and identity (pp. 157–180). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
22.
LucasK.BuzzanellP. M. (2012). Memorable messages of hard times: Constructing short- and long-term resiliencies through family communication. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 189–208. doi:10.1080/15267431.2012.687196
23.
LyubomirskyS.SousaL.DickerhoofR. (2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking and thinking about life’s triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 692–708. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.692
24.
MarinK.BohanekJ.FivushR. (2008). Positive effects of talking about the negative: Family narratives of negative experiences and preadolescents’ perceived competence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 573–593. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00572.x
25.
McAdamsD. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Guilford Press.
26.
McAdamsD. P.ReynoldsJ.LewisM.PattenA. H.BowmanP. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative and their relation to psychological adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 474–485. doi:10.1177/0146167201274008
27.
Miller-DayM. (2004). Communication among grandmothers, mothers, and adult daughters: A qualitative study of maternal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
NotterM. L.MacTavishK. A.ShamahD. (2008), Pathways toward resilience among women in rural trailer parks. Family Relations, 57, 613–624. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00527.x
29.
OnayliS.Erdur-BakerO. (2013). Mother-daughter relationship and daughters’ self-esteem. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 327–331. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.560
30.
OwenW. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
31.
PennebakerJ.SeagalJ. (1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1243–1254.
32.
RandallW.BaldwinC.McKenzie-MohrS.McKimE.FurlongD. (2015). Narrative and resilience: A comparative analysis of how older adults story their lives. Journal of Aging Studies, 34, 155–161. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2015.02.010
33.
RichardsonG. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307–321. doi:10.1002/jclp.10020
34.
SaltzmanW. R.PynoosR. S.LesterP.LayneC. M.BeardsleeW. R. (2013). Enhancing family resilience through family narrative co-construction. Clinical Child Family Psychology Review, 16, 294–310. doi:10.1007/s10567-013-0142-2
35.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455–472. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305
36.
TracyS. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
37.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
38.
WhiteM.EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre.
