Comparing West Germany and the U.S., we analyze the association between equity—in terms of the relative gender division of paid and unpaid work hours—and the risk of marriage dissolution. Our aim is to identify under what conditions equity influences couple stability. We apply event-history analysis to marriage histories using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel for West Germany and the Panel Study of Income Dynamics for the U.S. for the period 1986–2009/10. For the U.S., we find that deviation from equity is particularly destabilizing when the wife underbenefits, especially when both partners’ paid work hours are similar. In West Germany, equity is less salient. Instead, we find that the male breadwinner model remains the single most stable couple arrangement.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436. doi:10.1037/h0040968
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. doi:10.12691/ajap-1-1-2
3.
AllisonP. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13, 61–98. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00065.x
4.
AmatoP. R. (2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 959–965. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00065.x
5.
AmatoP. R.JohnsonD. R.BoothA.RogersS. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00001.x
6.
BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB.CohenB. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. Sociological Theories in Progress, 2, 119–146.
7.
BirdC. E. (1999). Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 40, 32–45. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2676377
8.
BittmanM.EnglandP.SayerL.FolbreN.MathesonG. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214. doi:10.1086/378341
9.
BraunM.Lewin-EpsteinN.StierH.BaumgärtnerM. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1145–1156. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00556.x
10.
BreenR.CookeL. P. (2005). The persistence of the gendered division of domestic labour. European Sociological Review, 21, 43–57. doi:10.1093/esr/jci003
11.
BrinesJ. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.
12.
CherlinA. J. (2000). Toward a new home socioeconomics of union formation. In WaiteL. J. (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 126–144). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
13.
CherlinA. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
14.
CookK. S.HegtvedtK. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 217–241.
15.
CookeL. P. (2004). The gender division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1246–1259. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00090.x
16.
CookeL. P. (2006). Doing gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 442–472. doi:10.1086/506417
17.
CookeL. P.ErolaJ.EvertssonM.GählerM.HärkönenJ.HewittB., … TrappeH. (2013). Labor and love: Wives’ employment and divorce risk in its socio-political context. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20, 482–509. doi:10.1093/sp/jxt016
18.
CotterD.HermsenJ. M.VannemanR. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 259–289.
19.
DeMarisA. (2007). The role of relationship inequity in marital disruption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 177–195. doi:10.1177/0265407507075409
20.
DeMarisA. (2010). The 20-year trajectory of marital quality in enduring marriages: Does equity matter?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 449–471. doi:10.1177/0265407510363428
21.
DeMarisA.LongmoreM. A. (1996). Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. Social Forces, 74, 1043–1071. doi:10.1093/sf/74.3.1043
22.
Esping-AndersenG.BoertienD.BonkeJ.GraciaP. (2013). Couple specialization in multiple equilibria. European Sociological Review, 29, 1280–1295. doi:10.1093/esr/jct004
23.
FuwaM. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767. doi:10.1177/000312240406900601
24.
GagerC. T. (1998). The role of valued outcomes, justifications, and comparison referents in perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 622–648. doi:10.1177/019251398019005007
25.
GagerC. T. (2008). What’s fair is fair? Role of justice in family labor allocation decisions. Marriage & Family Review, 44, 511–545. doi:10.1080/01494920802454116
26.
GagerC. T.Hohmann-MarriottB. (2006). Distributive justice in the household: A comparison of alternative theoretical models. Marriage and Family Review, 40, 5–42. doi:10.1300/J002v40n02_02
27.
GeistC. (2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review, 21, 23–41. doi:10.1093/esr/jci002
28.
GergenK. J. (1980). Exchange theory: The transient and the enduring. In GergenK. J.GreenbergM. S.WillisR. H. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 261–280). New York: Plenum Press.
29.
German Socio-Economic Panel Study (GSOEP). (2010). Data for years 1984–2009 (version 26). Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin).
30.
GlassJ.FujimotoT. (1994). Housework, paid work, and depression among husbands and wives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 179–191. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2137364
31.
GreensteinT. N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585–595. doi:10.2307/353719
32.
GreensteinT. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 322–335. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x
33.
GuptaS. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700–711. doi:10.2307/353571
34.
HatfieldE.TraupmannJ.SprecherS.UtneM.HayJ. (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In IckesW. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 91–117). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_5
35.
HatfieldE.RapsonR. L.Aumer-RyanK. (2008). Social justice in love relationships: Recent developments. Social Justice Research, 21, 413–431. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0080 -1
36.
HegtvedtK. A.MarkovskyB. N. (1995). Justice and injustice. In CookK.FineG.HouseJ. S. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives in social psychology (pp. 257–280). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
HeimerC. A.StaffenL. R. (1998). For the sake of the children: The social organization of responsibility in the hospital and the home. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
HigginsC.DuxburyL.LeeC. (1994). Impact of life-cycle stage and gender on the ability to balance work and family responsibilities. Family Relations, 2, 144–150. doi:10.2307/585316
39.
HochschildA. R.MachungA. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Viking.
40.
HomansA. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
41.
HomansG. C. (1976). Fundamental processes of social exchange. In HollanderE. P.HuntR. J. (Eds.), Current perspectives in social psychology (pp. 161–173). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
HoodJ. C. (1983). Becoming a two-job family. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
43.
HookJ. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/30039013
44.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
KalmijnM.MondenC. W. S. (2012). The division of labor and depressive symptoms at the couple level: Effects of equity or specialization?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 358–374. doi:10.1177/0265407511431182
46.
Kamp DushC. M.TaylorM. G. (2012). Trajectories of marital conflict across the life course: Predictors and interactions with marital happiness trajectories. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 341–368. doi:10.1177/0192513X11409684
47.
KluwerE.MikulaG. (2003). Gender-related inequalities in the division of family work in close relationships: A social psychological perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 185–216. doi:10.20180/10463280240000064
48.
KnudsenK.WærnessK. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113. doi:10.1093/esr/jcm037
49.
LyngstadT. H.JalovaaraM. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research, 23, 257–292. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.10
50.
MikulaG. (1998). Division of household labor and perceived justice: A growing field of research. Social Justice Research, 11, 215–241. doi:10.1023/A:1023282615718
51.
MolmL. D.CookK. S. (1995). Social exchange and exchange networks. In CookK. S.FineG. A.HouseJ. S. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 209–235). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
NockS. L. (2001). The marriages of equally dependent spouses. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 755–775. doi:10.1177/019251301022006005
53.
OláhL. S.GählerM. (2014). Gender equality perceptions, division of paid and unpaid work, and partnership dissolution in Sweden. Social Forces, 93, 571–594. doi:10.1093/sf/sou066
54.
Panel Study of Income Dynamics. (2016). Public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
55.
RuppannerL. (2008). Fairness and housework: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 509–526. Retrieved from jstor.org/stable/41604243
56.
RuppannerL. (2010). Conflict and housework: Does country context matter?European Sociological Review, 26, 557–570. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp038
57.
RuppannerL. (2012). Housework conflict and divorce: A multi-level analysis. Work, Employment & Society, 26, 638–656. doi:10.1177/0950017012445106
58.
SampsonE. E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of social Issues, 31, 45–64.
59.
SchwartzC. R.HanH. (2014). The reversal of the gender gap in education and trends in marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 79, 605–629. doi:10.1177/0003122414539682
60.
SprecherS. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–321. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2786770
61.
StaffordL.CanaryD. J. (2006). Equity and interdependence as predictors of relational maintenance strategies. The Journal of Family Communication, 6, 227–254. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0604_1
62.
SuitorJ. J. (1991). Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of household labor across the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1, 221–230. doi:10.2307/353146
63.
ThompsonL. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181–196. doi:0.1177/019251391012002003
64.
Van Der LippeT. (2007). Dutch workers and time pressure: Household and workplace characteristics. Work, Employment & Society, 21, 693–711. doi:10.1177/0950017007082877
65.
Van YperenN. W.BuunkB. P. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287–309. doi 10.1002/ejsp.2420200403
66.
Van WilligenM.DrenteaP. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44, 571–597. doi:10.1023/A:1012243125641
67.
WagnerG. G. (2009). The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in the Nineties: An example of incremental innovations in an ongoing longitudinal study. SOEP papers n 257. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
68.
WalsterE.BerscheidE.WalsterG. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151. doi:org/10.1037/h0033967
69.
WilcoxW. B.NockS. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1321–1345. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0076
70.
YodanisC. (2010). The institution of marriage. In TreasandJ.DrobnicS. (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women and housework in cross-national perspective (pp. 175–191). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
