The current investigation advances existing research by exploring the stress elicited when individuals perceive their standard for openness has been unmet, identifying the coping strategies individuals engage in when faced with this stress, and assessing the consequences of individuals’ coping efforts on relational quality. Data were gathered from 205 individuals in newly dating relationships. Analyses revealed that punishing, exiting, reframing, and using humor coping strategies partially mediated the negative association between the stress linked to unfulfilled openness standards and relationship satisfaction. Specifically, stress was related to individuals’ use of each of these strategies. In turn, using humor was positively associated with relationship satisfaction, whereas punishing, exiting, and reframing were negatively associated with relationship satisfaction. Theoretical contributions and implications are discussed.
AbelM. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor, 15, 365–381. doi:10.1515/humr.15.4.365
2.
AfifiT. D.JosephA. (2009). The standards for openness hypothesis: A gendered explanation for why avoidance is so dissatisfying. In AfifiT. D.AfifiW. A. (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 254–276). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AfifiT. D.JosephA.AldeisD. (2012). The “standard for openness hypothesis”: Why women find (conflict) avoidance more dissatisfying than men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 102–125. doi:10.1177/0265407511420193
4.
AlexanderA. L. (2004). Coping with unfulfilled standards in dating relationships: Drawing upon personal and relationship resources. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 3143354).
5.
AlexanderA. L. (2008). Relationship resources for coping with unfulfilled standards in dating relationships: Commitment, satisfaction, and closeness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 725–747. doi:10.1177/0265407508093783
6.
AltmanI.TaylorD. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
BaucomD. H.EpsteinN.DaiutoA. D.CarelsR. A.RankinL. A.BurnettC. K. (1996a). Cognitions in marriage: The relationship between standards and attributions. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 209–222. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.2.209
8.
BaucomD. H.EpsteinN.RankinL. A.BurnettC. K. (1996b). Assessing relationship standards: The inventory of specific relationship standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 72–88. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.1.72
9.
BaucomD. H.EpsteinN.SayersS.SherT. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 31–38. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.31
10.
BaxterL. A. (1986). Gender differences in the hetero-sexual relationship rules embedded in break-up accounts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 289–306. doi:10.1177/0265407586033003
11.
BaxterL. A.WilmotW. W. (1985). Taboo topics in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 253–269. doi:10.1177/0265407585023002
12.
BergerC. R.CalabreseR. J. (1975). Some exploration in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
13.
BochnerA. P. (1982). On the efficacy of openness in close relationships. In BurgoonM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 5, pp. 109–124). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
14.
BodenmannG.MeuwlyN.BradburyT. N.GmelchS.LedermannT. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 408–424. doi:10.1177/0265407510361616
15.
BodenmannG.PihetS.KayserK. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
16.
BolderoJ. M.RobinsG. L.WilliamsB. J.FrancisJ. J.HamptonA.FourieA. J. (2009). Relational discrepancies and emotion: The moderating role of relational mode and relational discrepancy valence. Asian Journal of Psychology, 12, 259–273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01290.x
17.
ButzerB. A.KuiperN. A. (2008). Humor use in romantic relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction and pleasant versus conflict situations. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 245–260. doi:10.3200/JRLP.142.3.245-260
18.
CampbellL.MartinR. A.WardJ. R. (2008). An observational study of humor use while resolving conflict in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 41–55. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00183.x
19.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.KashyD. A.FletcherG. J. O. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447–462. doi:10.1177/0146167201274006
20.
Campbell-SillsL.CohanS. L.SteinM. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 585–599. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.001
21.
CanaryD. J.StaffordL. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 244–267. doi:10.1080/03637759209376268
22.
CaughlinJ. P. (2003). Family communication standards: What counts as excellent family communication and how are such standards associated with family satisfaction?Human Communication Research, 29, 5–40. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00830.x
23.
CaughlinJ. P.AfifiT. D. (2004). When is topic avoidance unsatisfying? Examining moderators of the association between avoidance and dissatisfaction. Human Communication Research, 30, 479–513. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00742.x
24.
CaughlinJ. P.GolishT. D. (2002). An analysis of the association between topic avoidance and dissatisfaction: Comparing perception and interpersonal explanations. Communication Monographs, 69, 275–295. doi:10.1080/03637750216546
25.
ClovenD. H.RoloffM. E. (1993). The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships. Communication Monographs, 60, 199–219. doi:10.1080/03637759309376309
26.
Connor-SmithJ. K.FlachsbartC. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080–1107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080
27.
DaileyR. M.PalomaresN. A. (2004). Strategic topic avoidance: An investigation of topic avoidance frequency, strategies used, and relational correlates. Communication Monographs, 71, 471–496. doi:10.1080/0363452042000307443
28.
DerlegaV. J.HarrisM. S.ChaikinA. L. (1973). Self-disclosure reciprocity, liking and the deviant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 277–284. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(73)90065-6
29.
DowneyG.FreitasA. L.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545–560. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545
30.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). Ideal standards in close relationships: Their structure and functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 102–105. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00070
31.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG.GilesT. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
32.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22.
33.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360
34.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.StuartG. L. (1994). The relationship standards and assumptions of violent versus nonviolent husbands. Cognitive Theory and Research, 18, 87–103. doi:10.1007/BF02357218
35.
HustonT. L.CaughlinJ. P.HoutsR. M.SmithS. E.GeorgeL. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of martial delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 237–252. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237
36.
HustonT. L.McHaleS. M.CrouterA. C. (1986). When the honeymoon’s over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In GilmourR.DuckS. W. (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
38.
KnoblochL. K.Carpenter-TheuneK. E. (2004). Topic avoidance in developing romantic relationships: Associations with intimacy and relational uncertainty. Communication Research, 31, 173–205. doi:10.1177/0093650203261516
39.
LarsonJ. H. (1992). “You’re my one and only”: Premarital counseling for unrealistic beliefs about mate selection. American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 242–253. doi:10.1080/01926189208250893
40.
LazarusR. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY: Springer.
41.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
42.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390. doi:10.1177/0265407598155001
43.
LyonsR. F.MickelsonK. D.SullivanM. J. L.CoyneJ. C. (1998). Coping as communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579–605. doi:10.1177/0265407598155001
44.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371
45.
MathenyK. B.AycockD. W.PughJ. L.CurletteW. L.Silva CannellaK. A. (1986). Stress coping: A qualitative and quantitative synthesis with implications for treatment. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 499–549. doi:10.1177/0011000086144001
46.
McNultyJ. K.KarneyB. R. (2001). Attributions in marriage: Integrating specific and global evaluations of a relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 943–955. doi:10.1177/0146167201278003
47.
ParksM. R. (1982). Ideology in interpersonal communication: Off the couch and into the world. In BurgoonM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 79–107). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
PriestJ.BurnettM.ThompsonR.VogelA.SchvaneveldtP. L. (2009). Relationship dissolution and romance and selection myths. Family Science Review, 14, 51–57.
49.
PtacekJ. T.DodgeK. L. (1995). Coping strategies and relationship satisfaction in couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 76–84. doi:10.1177/0146167295211008
50.
RoggensackK. E.SillarsA. (2014). Agreement and understanding about honesty and deception rules in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 178–199. doi:10.1177/0265407513489914
51.
RoloffM.IfertD. (1998). Antecedents and consequences of explicit agreements to declare a topic taboo in dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 5, 191–205. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00167.x
52.
RusbultC. E.JohnsonD. J.MorrowG. D. (1986). Impact of couple patterns of problem solving on distress and nondistress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 744–753. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.744
53.
SprecherS. (1987). The effects of self-disclosure given and received on affection for an intimate partner and stability of the relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 115–127. doi:10.1177/0265407587042001
54.
SprecherS.FelmleeD.MettsS.FehrB.VanniD. (1998). Factors associated with distress following the breakup of a close relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 791–809. doi:10.1177/0265407598156005
55.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 436–481. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004048
56.
StilesW. B. (1987). “I have to talk to somebody”: A fever model of disclosure. In DerlegaV J.BergJ. H. (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 257–282). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
57.
TroyA. S.WilhelmF. H.ShallcrossA. J.MaussI. B. (2010). Seeing the silver lining: Cognitive reappraisal ability moderates the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms. Emotion, 10, 783–795. doi:10.1037/a0020262
58.
VangelistiA. L.AlexanderA. L. (2002). Coping with disappointment in marriage: When partners’ standards are unmet. In NollerP.FeeneyJ. A. (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 201–227). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59.
VangelistiA. L.DalyJ. A. (1997). Gender differences in standards for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 203–219. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00140.x
60.
VelaL. E.Booth-ButterfieldM.WanzerM. B.ValladeJ. I. (2013). Relationships among humor, coping, relationship stress, and satisfaction in dating relationships: Replication and extension. Communication Research Reports, 30, 68–75. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.746224
61.
WundererE.SchneewindK. A. (2008). The relationship between marital standards, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 462–476. doi:10.1002/ejsp.405.
