This study examined the accuracy of sixth- and seventh-grade boys’ and girls’ self-perceived popularity within a group of same- and opposite-gender peers. The links between popularity, self-perceived popularity, and the interaction of these variables in relation to girls’ and boys’ loneliness was also explored. The results showed that boys and girls overestimated their popularity but overestimations were greater when self-perceptions were compared with perceptions of opposite- rather than same-gender peers. Perceiving oneself as popular, as well as actually being perceived as popular by others, was related to less loneliness in both boys and girls. The interaction between self-perceived popularity and actual popularity did not explain significant variance in loneliness above and beyond the contributions of actual and self-perceived popularity.
AusubelD. (2002). Theory and problems of adolescent development (3rd ed.). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
2.
BabadE. (2001). On the conception and measurement of popularity: More facts and some straight conclusions. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 3–29. doi:10.1023/A:1012780232587
3.
BellmoreA. D.CillessenA. H. N. (2003). Children’s meta-perceptions and meta-accuracy of acceptance and rejection by same-gender and other-gender peers. Social Development, 10, 217–233.
4.
BologniniM.PlancherelB.BettschartW.HalfonO. (1996). Self-esteem and mental health in early adolescence: development and gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 233–245.
5.
BrendgenM.VitaroF.TurgeonL.PoulinF.WannerB. (2004). Is there a dark side of positive illusions? Overestimation of social competence and subsequent adjustment in aggressive and nonaggressive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 305–320.
6.
BuhrmesterD. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 1101–1111.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.HawkleyL. C.ErnstJ. M.BurlesonM. H.BerntsonG. G.NourianiB.SpiegelD. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1054–1085.
8.
CardN. A.HodgesE. V. E.LittleT. D.HawleyP. H. (2005). Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 146–155.
9.
CillessenA. H. N.BellmoreA. D. (1999). Accuracy of social self-perceptions and peer competence in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 650–676.
10.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
12.
CillessenA. H. N.RoseA. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105.
13.
ClossonL. M. (2009). Status and gender differences in early adolescents’ descriptions of popularity. Social Development, 18, 412–426. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00459.x
14.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Mahwah.
15.
CoieJ. D. (1990). Toward a theory of peer rejection. In AsherS. R.CoieJ. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365–401). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GentileB.GrabeS.Dolan-PascoeB.TwengeJ. M.WellsB. E.MaitinoA. (2009). Gender differences in domain-specific self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 13, 34–45.
17.
GommansR. (2010). Sociometric status, peer-perceived popularity, bullying, and psychopathological outcomes: Associations and the moderating role of involvement in bullying. Unpublished manuscript, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
18.
HampsonE.van AndersS. M.MullinL. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 401–416. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002
19.
HarterS. (1990). Self and identity development. In FeldmanS.ElliottG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 352–387). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
HeinrichL. M.GulloneE. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695–718. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002
21.
LaddG. W.EttekalI. (2013). Peer-related loneliness across early to late adolescence: Normative trends, intra-individual trajectories, and links with depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1269–1282.
22.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (1999). Children’s interpersonal perceptions as a function of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160, 225–242. doi:10.1080/0022132990959539
23.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2009). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status across childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
24.
LarsonR.RichardsM. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Development, 62, 284–300. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01531.x
25.
LeaseA. M.MusgroveK. T.AxelrodJ. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likeability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508–533. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00213
26.
LitwackS. D.AikinsJ. W.CillessenA. H. N. (2012). The distinct roles of sociometric and perceived popularity in friendship: Implications for adolescent depressive affect and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 226–251.
27.
MaccobyE. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
28.
MayeuxL.CillessenA. H. N. (2008). It’s not just being popular, it’s knowing it, too: The role of self-perceptions of status in the associations between peer status and aggression. Social Development, 17, 871–888. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00474.x
29.
McElhaneyK. B.AntonishakJ.AllenJ. P. (2008). “They like me, they like me not”: Popularity and adolescents’ perceptions of acceptance predicting social functioning over time. Child Development, 79, 720–731. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01153.x
30.
NangleD. W.ErdleyC. A. (2001). Editors’ notes. In NangleD. W.ErdleyC. A. (Series Eds.)
DamonW.(Volume Ed.), New directions for child and adolescent development. The role of friendship in psychological adjustment (Vol. 91, pp. 1–4). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
NangleD. W.ErdleyC. A.NewmanJ. E.MasonC. A.CarpenterE. M. (2003). Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 546–555.
32.
PaquetteJ. A.UnderwoodM. K. (1999). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 242–266.
33.
ParkhurstJ. T.HopmeyerA. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. doi:10.1177/0272431698018002001
34.
PuckettM. B.AikinsJ. W.CillessenA. H. N. (2008). Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 563–576. doi:10.1002/ab.20280
35.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of gender differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
36.
RosipJ. C.HallJ. A. (2004). Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 267–286. doi:10.1007/s10919-004-4159-6
37.
RussellD. (1996). The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
38.
SandstromM. J.CillessenA. H. N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305–314. doi:10.1177/0165025406072789
39.
SchriberR. A.RobinsR. W. (2012). Self-knowledge: An individual-differences perspective. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 105–131). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. F.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
41.
VaillancourtT.HymelS. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408. doi:10.1002/ab.20138
42.
VanhalstJ.LuyckxK.ScholteR. H. J.EngelsR. C. M. E.GoossensL. (2013). Low self-esteem as a risk factor for loneliness in adolescence: Perceived—but not actual—social acceptance as an underlying mechanism. The Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1067–1081. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9751-y
43.
WentzelK. R.BarryC.CaldwellK. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195–203.
44.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.HunterT. A.PronkR. (2007). A model of behaviors, peer relations and depression: Perceived social acceptance as a mediator and the divergence of perceptions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 273–302.
45.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.WatersA. M.KindermannT. (2010). A social relations analysis of liking for and by peers: Associations with gender, depression, peer perception, and worry. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.00
