This research explored the possibility of feeling over-idealized, or “put on a pedestal” by a partner, examining whether there is an optimal level of perceived idealization, such that too little or too much is detrimental. Perceived over-idealization was manipulated experimentally with 99 dating couples (Study 1), and in surveys of 89 married (Study 2) and 156 dating couples (Study 3). Study 1 found that participants physically distanced themselves from their partners following a perceived over-idealization manipulation. Study 2 found curvilinear associations (i.e., positive up to a point, then negative) of satisfaction with perceived idealization of traits and abilities. Study 3 found a similar curvilinear association of perceived idealization of abilities with satisfaction, which appeared to be mediated by reduced accommodation and possibly also by threat to self, as suggested by theory.
BaumeisterR. (1989). The optimal margin of illusion. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 8, 176–189. doi:10.1521/jscp.1989.8.2.176
2.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.3102/10769986030002227
3.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
4.
DerrickJ. L.MurrayS. L. (2007). Enhancing relationship perceptions by reducing felt inferiority: The role of attachment style. Personal Relationships, 14, 531–549. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00170.x
5.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.263
6.
FisherH. E. (2006). The drive to love: The neural mechanism for mate selection. In SternbergR. J.WeissK. (Eds.), The New Psychology of Love (pp. 87–115). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
FlynnF. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539–553. doi:10.2307/30040648
8.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE. A.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
9.
GrantA. M.SchwartzB. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76. doi:10.1177/1745691610393523
10.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. doi:10.2307/352430
11.
HustonT.McHaleS.CrouterA. (1986). When the honeymoon’s over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In GilmourR.DuckS. W. (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
KennyD. A.AcitelliL. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.439
13.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
LarsonD. G.ChastainR. L. (1990). Self-concealment: Conceptualization, measurement, and health implications. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9, 439–455. doi:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.439
15.
LeH.OhI. S.RobbinsS. B.IliesR.HollandE.WestrickP. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 96, 113–133. doi:10.1037/a0021016
16.
LearyM. R.PattonK. M.OrlandoA. E.Wagner-FunkW. (2000). The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 725–756. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00114
17.
McNultyJ. K.FinchamF. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology?: Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well being. American Psychologist, 67, 101–110. doi:10.1037/a0024572
18.
MillerP. J.NiehuisS.HustonT. L. (2006). Positive illusions in marital relationships: A 13-year longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1579–1594. doi:10.1177/0146167206292691
19.
MurrayS. L.AloniM.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ. L.StinsonD. A.LederS. (2009). Fostering partner dependence as trust insurance: The implicit contingencies of the exchange script in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 324–348. doi:10.1037/a0012856
20.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.126
21.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.DerrickJ. L.HarrisB.AloniM.LederS. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness? Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction. Psychological Science, 22, 619–626. doi:10.1177/0956797611403155
22.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.AloniM.PinkusR. T.DerrickJ.LederS. (2009). Commitment insurance: Compensating for the autonomy costs of interdependence in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 256–278. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
23.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
24.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1155
25.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (2000). Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 478–498. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.478
26.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG. M.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556–573. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.556
27.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480–497. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.480
28.
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151. doi:10.2307/351302
29.
PatrickH.KneeC. R.CanevelloA.LonsbaryC. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 434–457. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434
30.
PelhamB.SwannW. B.Jr (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 672–680. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.672
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
33.
ReisH. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00139.x
34.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 415–428). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM. (2009). The Michelangelo phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 305–309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01657.x
36.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564–596). New York, NY: Guilford. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00147.x
37.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059
38.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
39.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
40.
StinsonD. A.LogelC.HolmesJ. G.WoodJ. V.ForestA. M.GaucherD.…KathJ. (2010). The regulatory function of self-esteem: Testing the epistemic and signaling systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 993–1013. doi:10.1037/a0020310
41.
SwannW. B.Jrde la RondeC.HixonJ. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857–869. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.857
42.
SwannW. B.JrStein-SeroussiA.GeislerR. B. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 392–401. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.392
43.
UysalA.LinH. L.KneeC. R. (2010). The role of need satisfaction in self-concealment and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 187–199. doi:10.1177/0146167209354518
44.
UysalA.LinH. L.KneeC. R.BushA. L. (2012). The association between self-concealment from one’s partner and relationship well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 39–51. doi:10.1177/0146167211429331
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
