Mahoney and colleagues’ theorizing about the potential role of sanctity as a central feature of religion/spirituality is invoked to examine the relationships among sanctity of marriage, (un)forgiveness, sacrifice, and both positive and negative marital satisfaction. The study examined the perspectives of both members of 342 marital dyads using an Actor–Partner Interdependence Model and a multilevel path modeling. The results indicate that sanctity is related positively to marital satisfaction and negatively to martial dissatisfaction. Sanctity emerged as a strong predictor of marital quality even after accounting for forgiveness, unforgiveness, and sacrifice. Though sanctity is directly linked to positive marital satisfaction, the mediation effects via (un)forgiveness were not significant; however, a mediation effect via sacrifice was significant, which was related to negative marital quality.
CallV. A.HeatonT. B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 382.
2.
CampbellL.KashyD. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327–342. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00023
3.
CurtisK.EllisonC. G. (2002). Religious heterogamy and marital conflict: Findings from the national survey of families and households. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 551–576.
4.
DeMarisA.MahoneyA.PargamentK. I. (2010). Sanctification of marriage and general religiousness as buffers of the effects of marital inequity. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1255–1278.
5.
EllisonC. G.BartkowskiJ. P.AndersonK. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence?Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87–113.
6.
EllisonC. G.BurdetteA. M.WilcoxW. B. (2010). The couple that prays together: Race and ethnicity, religion, and relationship quality among working-age adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 963–975. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00742.x
7.
EllisonC. G.HendersonA. K.GlennN. D.HarkriderK. E. (2011). Sanctification, stress and marital quality. Family Relations, 60, 404–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00658.x
8.
FinchamF. D.AjayiC.BeachS. H. R. (2011). Spirituality and marital satisfaction in African American couples. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3, 259–268. doi:10.1037/a0023909
9.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9, 239–251. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00016
10.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 630–649. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.x
11.
FinchamF. D.HallJ.BeachS. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55, 415–427. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00411.x
12.
FinchamF. D.LinfieldK. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage?Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489–502. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.489-502
13.
FinchamF. D.StanleyS.BeachS. R. H. (2007). Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 275–292. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00362.x
14.
GlaeserE. L.SacerdoteB. I. (2008). Education and religion. Journal of Human Capital2, 188–215.
15.
GordonK. C.BaucomD. H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 179–199. doi:10.1080/01926180301115
16.
GordonK. C.BaucomD. H.SnyderD. K. (2000). The use of forgiveness in marital therapy. In McCulloughM. E.PargamentK. I.ThoresenC. E. (Eds.), Forgiveness: theory, research, and practice (pp. 203–227). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17.
HatfieldE.TraupmannJ.SprecherS.UtneM.HayM. (1985). Equity in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 91–117). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
18.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
19.
ImpettE. A.GableS. L.PeplauL. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: the costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 327–344.
20.
KennyD. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294. doi: 10.1177/0265407596132007
21.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). The analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
LedermannT.MachoS.KennyD. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor–partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 595–612. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
23.
LichterD.CarmaltJ. (2009). Religion and marital quality among low-income couples. Social Science Research, 38, 168–187. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.07.003
24.
MahoneyA. (2010). Religion in families, 1999–2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 805–827. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x
25.
MahoneyA.PargamentK. I.JewellT.SwankA. B.ScottE.EmeryE.RyeM. (1999). Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 321–338. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.3.321
26.
MahoneyA.PargamentK. I.Murray-SwankA.Murray-SwankN. (2003). Religion and the sanctification of family relationships. Review of Religious Research, 44, 220–236.
27.
MattsonR. E.PaldinoD.JohnsonM. D. (2007). The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions. Psychological Assessment, 19, 146–151. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.146
28.
McCulloughM.WorthingtonE. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141–1164. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00085
29.
McFarlandM. J.BradleyR. E.WrightB. R. E.WeakliemD. L. (2011). Educational attainment and religiosity: Exploring variations by religious tradition. Sociology of Religion, 72, 166–188.
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
31.
PargamentK. I.MahoneyA. (2005). Sacred matters: Sanctification as a vital topic for the psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 179–198. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr1503_1
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
34.
RusbultC. E.BuunkB. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.
35.
SchiemanS. (2010). Socioeconomic status and beliefs about God’s influence in everyday life. Sociology of Religion, 71, 25–51.
36.
SchiemanS.JungJ. H. (2012). “Practical divine influence”: Socioeconomic status and belief in the prosperity gospel. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 738–756. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01682.x
37.
StanleyS. M.WhittonS. W.SadberryS. L.ClementsM. L.MarkmanH. J. (2006). Sacrifice as a predictor of marital outcomes. Family Process, 45, 289–303. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00171.x
38.
WaldronV.KelleyD. (2005). Forgiveness as a response to relational transgression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 723–742. doi:10.1177/0265407505056445
39.
WalsterE.WalsterG.BerscheidE. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
WhittonS. W.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2007). If I help my partner, will it hurt me? Perceptions of sacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 64–92. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.1.64
41.
WolfingerN. H.WilcoxW. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86, 1311–1337. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0023
42.
WorthingtonE. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
