Romantic partners’ emotions become coordinated in various ways and this may have implications for well-being (Butler (2011) Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393.). The present study uses a community sample of 44 committed heterosexual couples to examine whether cooperation, a generally beneficial relational process, is associated with emotional coordination and whether the pattern differs when men’s emotions are coordinated with their female partners’ prior emotions or vice versa. Using behavioral observations of cooperation and second-to-second measures of emotional experience during a face-to-face conversation, men showed the most positive emotional experience at high levels of mutual cooperation. As predicted, cooperation was associated with different coordination patterns for men and women, with high mutual cooperation predicting an inphase pattern for men (emotions changing in unison with their partners) and an antiphase pattern for women (emotions changing in opposite directions from their partners). Our results suggest that men and women may experience cooperation differently, despite engaging in similar behaviors.
AssadK. K.DonnellanM. B.CongerR. D. (2007). Optimism: An eduring resource for romantic couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 285–297.
2.
BadrH. (2004). Coping in marital dyads: A contextual perspective on the role of gender and health. Personal Relationships, 11, 197–211.
3.
BallietD.LiN. PMacfarlanS. J.Van VugtM. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 881–909.
4.
BodenmannG. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 47, 137–140.
5.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
BokerS. M.LaurenceauJ. P. (2007). Coupled dynamics and mutually adaptive context. In LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A., (Eds.). Modeling ecological and contextual effects in longitudinal studies of human development (pp. 299–324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR.L.HustonT. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). New York, NY: Academic.
8.
ButlerE. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393.
9.
ButlerE. A.RandallA. K. (2013). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–210.
10.
ButnerJ.DiamondL. M.HicksA. M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of attachment coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14, 431–455.
11.
CacioppoJ. T.UchinoB.CritesS. L.SnydersmithM. A.SmithG.BernstonG. G.LangP. J. (1992). Relationship between facial expressiveness and sympathetic activation in emotion: A critical review, with emphasis on modeling underlying mechanisms and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 110–128.
12.
CarstensenL. L.GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140–149.
13.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1993). Gender differences in marital conflict: The case of the demand/withdraw interaction pattern. In OskampS.CostanzoM. (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 113–141). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
FeldmanR. (2003). Infant–mother and infant–father synchrony: The coregulation of positive arousal. Infant Journal of Mental Health, 24, 1–23.
15.
FeldmanR.GreenbaumC. W.YirmiyaN. (1999). Mother–infant affect synchrony in mother–infant play as precursors to the development of symbolic competence. Infant Mental Health Journal, 20, 176–191.
16.
FieldT. (1994). The effects of mother’s physical and emotional unavailability on emotion regulation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 59, 208–277.
17.
FischerA. H.Rodriguez MosqueraP. M.van VianenE. A. M.MansteadA. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87–94.
18.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE. A.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245.
19.
GottmanJ. M. (1979). Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
GottmanJ. M. (1980). Consistency of nonverbal affect and affect reciprocity in marital interactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 711–717.
21.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22.
22.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1985). A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151–160.
23.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1988). The social psychophysiology of marriage. In NollerP.FitzpatrickM. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 182–200). Clevenson, England: Mutilingual Matters.
24.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ. T.RapsonR. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HelmJ. L.SbarraD. A.FerrerE. (2012). Assessing cross-partner associations in physiological responses via coupled oscillator models. Emotion, 12, 748–762.
26.
JulienD.BraultM.ChartrandE.BeginJ. (2000). Immediacy behaviors and synchrony in satisfied and dissatisfied couples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 84–90.
27.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data anlaysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
KerigP. (1996). Assessing the links between interparental conflict and child adjustment: The conflicts and problem-solving scales. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 454–473.
29.
KollockP. (2011). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of coopeartion. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.
30.
KringA. M.GordonA. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.
31.
LarsonR. W.AlmeidaD. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 5–20.
32.
LaurenceauJ. P.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97.
33.
LevensonR. W.CarstensenL. L.GottmanJ. (1994). The influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 56–68.
34.
LevensonR. W.GottmanJ. (1983). Marital interactions: Psychological linkage and affect exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597.
35.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115.
36.
ReedR. G.RandallA. K.PostJ. H.ButlerE. A. (in press). Partner influence and in-phase versus anti-phase physiological linkage in romantic couples. International Journal of Psychophysiology. Epub ahead of print 22 August 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.009
37.
ReisH. T.SprecherS. K. (Eds.) (2009). Encyclopedia of human relationships (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RichardsonM. J.MarshK. L.SchmidtR. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 62–79.
39.
RiméB., (2007). The social sharing of emotions as an interface between individual and collective processes in the construction of emotional climates. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 307–322.
40.
RohrbaughM. J.ShohamV.ButlerE. A.HaslerB. P.BermanJ. S. (2009). Affective synchrony in dual- and single-smoker couples: Further evidence of ‘′symptom-system fit’?Family Process, 48, 55–67.
41.
SASInstitute. (2004). SAS user′s guide, version 9.2. Cary, NC: Author.
42.
SaxbeD.RepettiR. L. (2010). For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 92–103.
43.
SchöebiD. (2008). The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 595–604.
44.
SchmidtR. C.O’BrienB. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9, 189–206.
45.
SherasP. L.Koch-SherasP. R. (2006). Couple power therapy: Building commitment, cooperation, communication and community in relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
StoutenJ.CeulemansE.TimmermanM. E.Van HielA. (2011). Tolerance to justice violations: the effects of need on emotional reactions after violating equality in social dilemmas. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 357–380.
48.
StoutenJ.De CremerD. (2010). “Seeing is believing”: The effects of facial expressions of emotion and verbal communication in social dilemmas. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 23, 271–287.
49.
VallacherR. R.NowakA.ZochowskiM. (2005). Dynamics of social coordination: The synchronization of internal states in close relationships. Interaction Studies, 6, 35–52.
50.
WubbenM. J. J.De CremerD.van DijkE. (2011). The communication of anger and disappointment helps to establish cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 489–501.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
