The present study examined how turning points reported by individuals in on-again/off-again (on–off) relationships reflected relationship trajectories. Participants (N = 581) completed an online Retrospective Interview Technique asking them to report on up to 10 turning points. Participants indicated their commitment level at each turning point. Based on the variations in commitment across turning points, five trajectories emerged. Trajectory groups were compared regarding relational stability factors. Results suggest that on–off partners with a steady-low commitment trajectory reported less stability than individuals with steady-high commitment. Additionally, partners in the fluctuating trajectory, which would seemingly represent less stability, reported moderate perceptions of their relationships, faring better than the low-steady commitment group. Overall, findings add to an understanding of how to best characterize on–off relationships.
AfifiW. A.FalatoW. L.WeinerJ. L. (2001). Identity concerns following a severe relational transgression: The role of discovery method for relational outcomes of infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 291–308.
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 595–612.
3.
ArriagaX. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.754
4.
ArriagaX. B.ReedJ. T.GoodfriendW.AgnewC. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1045
5.
BaxterL. A.BullisC. (1986). Turning points in the development of blended family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 291–313. doi:10.1111=j.1468–2958.1986.tb00088.x
6.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR. L.HustonT. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
BuhrmesterM. D.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
8.
CateR. M.LevinL. A.RichmondL. S. (2002). Premarital relationship stability: A review of recent research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 261–284. doi:10.1177/0265407502192005
9.
ConvilleR. L. (1987). Relational transitions: Inquiry into their structure and function. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 422–437.
10.
DaileyR. M. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of on-again/off-again relationships. Unpublished manuscript. University of Texas at Austin.
11.
DaileyR. M.JinB.BrodyN.McCrackenA. A.(2012, November). A dimensional approach to characterizing on-again/off-again dating relationships. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Orlando, FL.
12.
DaileyR. M.McCrackenA. A.JinB.RossettoK. R.GreenE. W. (in press). Negotiating breakups and renewals: Types of on-again/off-again dating relationships. Western Journal of Communication.
13.
DaileyR. M.MiddletonA. V.GreenE. W. (2012). Perceived relational stability in on-again/off-again relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 52–76.
14.
DaileyR. M.PfiesterA.JinB.BeckG.ClarkG. (2009). On-again/off-again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships?Personal Relationships, 16, 23–47.
15.
DeStenoD.BartlettM.BravermanJ.SaloveyP. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1103–1116.
16.
FelmleeD.SprecherS.BassinE. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly53, 13–30.
17.
FloydK.MormanM. T. (1998). The measurement of affectionate communication. Communication Quarterly, 46, 144–162. doi:10.1080/01463379809370092
18.
HustonT. L.SurraC.FitzgeraldN.CateR. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.GilmourR. (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 53–88). New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
Kamp DushC. M. (2012). Relationship-specific investments, family chaos, and cohabitation dissolution following a nonmarital birth. Family Relations, 60, 586–601.
20.
Koenig KellasJ.BeanD.CunninghamC.ChengK. Y. (2008). The ex-files: Trajectories, turning points, and adjustment in the development of post-dissolutional relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 23–50. doi:10.1177=0265407507086804
21.
LarzelereR. E.HustonT. L. (1980). The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 595–604.
22.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390. doi:10.111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
23.
LevingerG. (1976). A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 21–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02478.x
24.
LevingerG. (1999). Duty toward whom? Reconsidering attractions and barriers as determinants of commitment in a relationship. In JonesW. H.AdamsJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 37–52). New York, NY: Plenum.
25.
MillerL. C.BergJ. H.ArcherR. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244.
26.
MongeauP. A.TeubnerG. (2002). Romantic relationship transitions. Paper presented to the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
27.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
28.
SprecherS. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 599–613.
29.
SprecherS. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190–196. doi:10.1080/00224490209552141
30.
SurraC. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 357–375. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.49.2.357
31.
SurraC. A. (1987). Reasons for change in commitment: Variations by courtship type. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 17–33. doi:10.1177/0265407587041002
32.
SurraC. A.GrayC. E. (2000). A typology of processes of commitment to marriage: Why do partners commit to problematic relationships? In WaiteL. J.BackrachC.HindinM.ThomsonE.ThorntonA. (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 253–280). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
33.
SurraC. A.HughesD. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 5–21. doi:10.2307/353658
34.
SurraC. A.LongstrethM. (1990). Similarities in outcomes, interdependence, and conflict in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 501–516.
35.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
36.
WaldronV. R.KelleyD. L. (2005). Forgiving communication as a response to relational transgressions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 723–742.
