An examination of interpersonal relationships of runaway youth in varying cultural contexts provides an important glimpse into processes that help construct their personhood. Informed by Relational Dialectics Theory (RDT; Baxter, 2011), this ethnographic study explored competing discourses that animate the meaning of personhood in conflict communication of runaway boys in India. A discourse of individualism with accompanying themes of individual rights, fairness, and protection of self-worth dominated youths’ communications with peers, with secondary emphasis on interpersonal harmony. In contrast, a discourse of collectivism along with themes of respect for elders and non-expression were privileged over individual desires in the relationships between runaway youth and adults. A nuanced understanding of what it means to be a child in the context of relationships in India emerged.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In HolquistM. (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M.Bakhtin (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.; pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press(original published 1975).
2.
BaxterL. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22.
3.
BaxterL. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. A. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
5.
BurraN. (1995). Born to work: Child labor in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Department of Women and Child Development (2009). The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Retrieved fromhttp://wcddel.in/jjaact.html
8.
EwingK. P. (1991). Can psychoanalytic theories explain the Pakistani woman? Intrapsychic autonomy and interpersonal engagement in the extended family. Ethos, 19, 131–160.
9.
FarrowJ. A.DeisherR. W.BrownR.KuligJ. W.KipkeM. D. (1992). Health and health needs of homeless and runaway youth: A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 13, 717–726.
10.
FergusonK. M. (2009). Exploring family environment characteristics and multiple abuse experiences among homeless youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1875–1891.
11.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
12.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
KakarS. (1978). The inner world: A psychoanalytic study of childhood and society in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
14.
KhongL. Y. L. (2009). Runaway youths in Singapore: Exploring demographics, motivations, and environments. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 125–139.
15.
KhuranaS.SharmaN.JenaS.SahaR.IngleG. K. (2004). Mental health status of runaway adolescents. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 71, 405–409.
16.
KurtzS. (1992). All the mothers are one: Hindu India and cultural reshaping of psychoanalysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
LamD.ChengF. (2008). Chinese policy reaction to the problem of street children: An analysis from the perspective of street children. Children & Youth Services Review, 30, 575–584.
18.
LambS. (1997). The making and unmaking of persons: Notes on aging and gender in North India. Ethos, 25, 279–302.
19.
LukmanZ. M. (2009). Childhood abuse among children involved in prostitution in Malaysia. The Social Sciences, 4, 567–572.
20.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
21.
MathurM.RathoreP.MathurM. (2009). Incidence, type and intensity of abuse in street children in India. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 907–913.
22.
RavalV. V. (2009). Negotiating conflict between personal desires and others’ expectations in lives of Gujarati women. Ethos, 37, 489–511.
23.
SchaffnerL. (1998). Searching for connections: A new look at teenaged runaways. Adolescence, 33, 619–627.
24.
SeymourS. (1999). Women, family, and child care in India: A world in transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979) The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26.
TrawickM. (1992). Notes on love in a Tamil family. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
27.
TiwariP. A.GulatiN.SethiG. R.MehraM. (2002). Why do some boys run away from home?Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 69(5), 397–399.
28.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
VermaS. (1999). Socialization for survival: Developmental issues among working street children in India. In RaffaelliM.LarsonR. W. (Eds.), Homeless and working youth around the world: Exploring developmental issues: New directions for child and adolescent development (No. 85, pp. 5–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
