Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent advancements in communication technology have enabled billions of people to connect over great distances using mobile phones, yet little is known about how the frequent presence of these devices in social settings influences face-to-face interactions. In two experiments, we evaluated the extent to which the mere presence of mobile communication devices shape relationship quality in dyadic settings. In both, we found evidence they can have negative effects on closeness, connection, and conversation quality. These results demonstrate that the presence of mobile phones can interfere with human relationships, an effect that is most clear when individuals are discussing personally meaningful topics.

Keywords

Closeness connection conversation quality face-to-face interactions mobile phones relationship quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.

Aron

Melinat

Aron

E. N.

Vallone

R. D.

Bator

R. J.

(1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377.

Campbell

Simpson

J. A.

Boldry

J. G.

Rubin

(2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 14–31.

Davis

M. H.

(1995). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Corte Madera, CA: Select Press.

Diener

Emmons

R. A.

(1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.

Geser

(2002). Sociology of the mobile phone. Unpublished manuscript, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Leung

Wei

(2000). More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 308–320.

McAuley

Duncan

Tammen

V. V.

(1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48–58.

Mieczakowski

Goldhaber

Clarkson

(2011). Culture, communication, and change: Report on an investigation of the use and impact of modern media and technology in our lives. In Culture, communication, and change. Cambridge, UK: Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge.

10.

O'Keefe

G. J.

Sulanowski

B. K.

(1995). More than just talk: Uses, gratifications, and the telephone. Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly, 72, 922–933.

11.

Plant

(2000). On the mobile. The effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Retrieved from http://www.Motorola.com/mot/documents/0,1028,333,00.pdf

12.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

13.

Reis

H. T.

Clark

M. S.

Holmes

J. G.

(2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek

D. J.

Aron

(Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Reis

H. T.

Sheldon

K. M.

Gable

S. L.

Roscoe

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.

15.

Shah

(2003). The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424–439.

16.

Srivastava

(2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behavior. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24, 111–129.

17.

Strayer

D. L.

Drews

F. A.

Johnston

W. A.

(2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–32.

18.

Strayer

D. L.

Johnston

W. A.

(2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.

19.

Turkle

(2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

28.68 MB

Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material