Support-seeking, a critical and strategic function of close relationships, is increasingly practiced via texting. Guided by attachment theory and an affordance-centric approach, this study investigated to what extent individuals in a romantic relationship would use texting and face-to-face for support-seeking, and what stimulates their interest in mediated support-seeking. A survey of college students in exclusive romantic relationships (N = 211) found that several affordances (i.e., accessibility, the availability of social cues, and conversation control) were associated with varying levels of interest in texting or face-to-face for support-seeking. Both accessibility and the availability of social cues were perceived as less important by avoidant individuals, which was related to a lack of interest in texting and face-to-face interactions for support-seeking. Anxious individuals valued the availability of social cues more, which led to a greater interest in face-to-face interactions when seeking assistance. These findings contribute to a better understanding of support-seeking behavior in today’s mediated world.
BarbeeA. P.GulleyM. R.CunninghamM. R. (1990). Support seeking in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(4), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590074009
2.
BarrettL. F.GrossJ.ChristensenT. C.BenvenutoM. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 15(6), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239
3.
BodieG. D. (2011). The role of thinking in the comforting process: An empirical test of a dual-process framework. Communication Research, 40(4), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211427030
4.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.
5.
BuehlerE. M.CrowleyJ. L.PetersonA. M.HighA. C. (2019). Broadcasting for help: A typology of support-seeking strategies on Facebook. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2566–2588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819853821
6.
BurlesonB. R.HolmstromA. J.GilstrapC. M. (2005). Guys can’t say that to guys”: Four experiments assessing the normative motivation account for deficiencies in the emotional support provided by men. Communication Monographs, 72(4), 468–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500322636
7.
CaughlinJ. P.SharabiL. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
9.
ChoiM.TomaC. (2014). Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.026.
10.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053
11.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363
12.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
13.
EvansS. K.PearceK. E.VitakJ.TreemJ. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
14.
FarajS.AzadB. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In LeonardiP. M.NardiB.KallinikosJ. (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press.
15.
FeasterJ. C. (2010). Expanding the impression management model of communication channels: An information control scale. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01535.x
16.
FoxJ.McEwanB. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
17.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350
18.
GirmeY. U.SibleyC. G.HaddenB. W.SchmittM. T.HungerJ. M. (2022). Unsupported and stigmatized? The association between relationship status and well-being is mediated by social support and social discrimination. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030102
19.
GoldsmithD. (1992). Managing conflicting goals in supportive interaction: An integrative theoretical framework. Communication Research, 19(2), 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002007
20.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
21.
LedbetterA. M.HerbertC. B. (2022). Revisiting the impression management model: The mediating role of net benefits, the moderating role of communication competence, and the importance of mutual-face concern. Information, Communication & Society, 25(3), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1803945
LimV. K.TeoT. S.ZhaoX. (2013). Psychological costs of support seeking and choice of communication channel. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.518248
24.
LiuB.WeiL. (2018). Modeling social support on social media: Effect of publicness and the underlying mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.006
25.
LuoS. (2014). Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.014
26.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Sage.
27.
MoreyJ. N.GentzlerA. L.CreasyB.OberhauserA. M.WestermanD. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019
28.
OhH. J.LaRoseR. (2016). Impression management concerns and support-seeking behavior on social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.005.
29.
O’SullivanP. B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/26.3.403
30.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement, and relationship quality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210383045
RainsS. A.AkersC.PavlichC. A.TsetsiE.AppelbaumM. (2019). Examining the quality of social support messages produced face-to-face and in computer-mediated communication: The effects of hyperpersonal communication. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1595076
33.
RainsS. A.BrunnerS. R.AkersC.PavlichC. A.TsetsiE. (2016). The implications of computer-mediated communication (CMC) for social support message processing and outcomes: When and why are the effects of support messages strengthened during CMC?Human Communication Research, 42(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12087
34.
RainsS. A.WrightK. B. (2016). Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-art review and agenda for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735260
35.
RifeS. C.KernsK. A.UpdegraffJ. A. (2016). Seeking support in response to social and achievement stressors: A multivenue analysis. Personal Relationships, 23(2), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12130
36.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
37.
RuppelE. K. (2015). The affordance utilization model: Communication technology use as relationships develop. Marriage & Family Review, 51(8), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1061628
38.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434
39.
TaylorS. E.ShermanD. K.KimH. S.JarchoJ.TakagiK.DunaganM. S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
40.
TomaC. L.ChoiM. (2016). Mobile media matters: Media use and relationship satisfaction among geographically close dating couples. In GergleD. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 394–404). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2835204
41.
VitakJ. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
42.
WaltherJ. B.BoydS. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In LinC. A.AtkinD. (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153–188). Hampton Press.
43.
WeiM.RussellD. W.MallinckrodtB.VogelD. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationship scale (ECR)-Short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041
44.
YoungvorstL. J.HighA. C. (2018). Anyone free to chat?” Using technological features to elicit quality support online. Communication Monographs, 85(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1426871
45.
ZhaoJ.HanH.ZhongB.XieW.ChenY.ZhiM. (2021). Health information on social media helps mitigate Crohn’s disease symptoms and improves patients’ clinical course. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106588.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
