Franiuk and colleagues (2002) distinguished between two implicit theories of relationships (ITRs)—a soulmate theory and a work-it-out theory. The soulmate theory reflects beliefs that finding the right person is important for relationship success while the work-it-out theory reflects beliefs that relationships take effort to be successful. The current research explores the association between the ITRs and relationship violence. Surveying an older sample than a traditional college sample (N = 143), the ITRs interacted with partner fit and relationship length to predict relationship violence. As predicted, for those with poor partner fit, the soulmate theory was associated with low violence early in relationships, but the soulmate theory lost some of its protective benefits in longer relationships.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonM. A.GilligP. M.SitakerM.McCloskeyK.MalloyK.GrigsbyN. (2003). “Why doesn’t she just leave?”: A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 1(8), 151–155. doi:10.1023/A:1023564404773.
3.
BirnbaumM. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
4.
BookwalaJ.FriezeI. H.SmithC.RyanK. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297–311.
5.
BornsteinR. F. (2006). The complex relationship between dependency and domestic violence:Converging psychological factors and social forces. American Psychologist, 61, 595–606. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.595.
6.
BrownS. L.BulandaJ. R. (2008). Relationship violence in young adulthood: A comparison of daters, cohabitors, and marrieds. Social Science Research, 37, 73–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.002.
7.
BurnetteJ. L.FraniukR. (2010). Individual difference in implicit theories of relationships and partner fit: Predicting forgiveness in developing relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.09.011.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
10.
FraniukR.CohenD.PomerantzE. M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships, 9, 345–367. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.09401.
11.
FraniukR.PomerantzE. M.CohenD. (2004). The causal role of theories of relationships: Consequences for satisfaction and cognitive strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1494–1507. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264894.
12.
GellesR. J.CornellC. P. (1990). Intimate violence in families (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
HardingH. G.Helwig-LarsenM. (2009). Perceived risk for future intimate partner violence among women in a domestic violence shelter. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 75–85. doi: 10.1007/s10896-008-9211-6.
14.
HerbertT. B.SilverR. C.EllardJ. H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: I. How and why do women stay?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 311–325. doi: 10.2307/352901.
15.
Holtzworth-MunroeA. (1988). Causal attributions in marital violence: Theoretical and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 331–344. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90095-5.
16.
Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2005). Male versus female intimate partner violence: Putting controversial findings in context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1120–1125. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00203.x.
17.
KneeC. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 360–370. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.360.
18.
KneeC. R.NanayakkaraA.VietorN. A.NeighborsC.PatrickH. (2001). Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 808–819. doi: 10.1177/0146167201277004.
19.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.LonsbaryC. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientation toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3.
20.
KneeC. R.PatrickH.VietorN. A.NeighborsC. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 617–628. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262853.
21.
MizeK. D.ShackelfordT. K.ShackelfordV. A. (2009). Hands-on killing of intimate partners as a function of sex and relationship status/state. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 463–570. doi: 10.1007/s10896-009-9244-5.
22.
ReipsU-D. (2000). The Web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In BirnbaumH. M. (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 89–117). San Diego,CA: Academic.
23.
RobertsonK.MurachverT. (2009). Attitudes and attributions associated with female and male partner violence. Journal of Applied Social Psych, 39, 1481–1512. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00492.x.
24.
RuvoloA. P.RotondoJ. L. (1998). Diamonds in the rough: Implicit personality theories and views of partner and self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(7), 750–758. doi: 10.1177/0146167298247007.
25.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactic (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88. doi: 10.2307/351733.
26.
StrausM. A.GellesR. J.SteinmetzS. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books.
27.
ThompsonR. S.BonomiA. E.AndersonM.ReidR. J.DimerJ. A.CarrellD.& RivaraF. P. (2006). Intimate partner violence: Prevalence, types, and chronicity in adult women. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 30, 447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.016.
28.
TjadenP. G.ThoennesN. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142–161. doi: 10.1177/10778010022181769.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD. (2008). Culture, gender, and men’s intimate partner violence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 652–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00080.x.
32.
WalkerR.LoganT. K.JordanC. E.CampbellJ. C. (2004). An integrative review of separation in the context of victimization: Consequences and implications for women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 143–193. doi: 10.1177/1524838003262333.
33.
WoodJ. T. (2001). The normalization of violence in heterosexual romantic relationships: Women’s narratives of love and violence. Journal of Social and Personality Relationships, 18, 239–261. doi: 10.1177/0265407501182005.
