The study investigated the association between coach–athlete relationship interdependence and satisfaction level as a function of competition level, relationship length, and gender composition. A series of multilevel modelling analyses found that the associations between relationship interdependence and sport-related satisfaction were weaker for lower-level competitors than they were for higher-level competitors, as well as for short-term relationships compared to long-term relationships. We also found that all female dyads were more satisfied with training and instruction than other gender combinations. Moreover, the associations between relationship interdependence and sport-related satisfaction were weaker for female coach-male athlete dyads than they were for other gender combination dyads. The findings and their implications for theory and practice are discussed.
AronA.AronE. N. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In FletcherG. J. O.FitnessJ. (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 325–344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AuneS. K.BullerD. B.AuneK. R. (1996). Display rule development in romantic relationships: Emotion management and perceived appropriateness of emotions across relationship stages. Human Communication Research, 23, 115–145.
3.
BaumeisterR.F.LearyM.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
4.
ByrneD.CloreG. L.SmeatonG. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1167–1170.
5.
ChelladuraiP.CarronA. (1983). Athletic maturity and preferred leadership. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 371–380.
6.
CôtéJ.GilbertW. (2009) An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 4, 307–323.
7.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of Goal Pursuits: Human needs andthe self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
8.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.VeretteJ. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409.
9.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
10.
GreenS. G.AndersonS. E.ShiversS. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, 66, 203–214.
11.
HindeR. A.FinkenauerC.AuhagenA. E. (2001). Relationships and the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 8, 187–204.
12.
JacksonB.GroveJ. R.BeauchampM. R. (2010). Relational efficacy beliefs and relationship quality within coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 1035–1050.
13.
JowettS. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3 + 1Cs in the coach–athlete relationship. In JowettS.LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 15–27). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14.
JowettS. (2008). Moderators and mediators of the association between the coach–athlete relationship and physical self-concept. International Journal of Coaching Science, 2, 43–62.
15.
JowettS.Clark-CarterD. (2006). Perceptions of empathic accuracy and assumed similarity in the coach–athlete relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 617–637.
16.
JowettS.CockerillI. M. (2003). Olympic medalists' perspective of the athlete-coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 313–331.
17.
JowettS.Don CarolisG. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship and perceived satisfaction in team sports. In StelterR. (Ed.), XIth European Congress of Sport Psychology Proceedings (pp. 83–84). Copenhagen, Denmark: Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultets.
18.
JowettS.GaleE. (2002). An exploratory study into the nature of the coach – athlete relationship in track and field athletics. Poster presentation at the Annual Conference of the British Association of Sport Exercise Sciences, Manchester, UK.
19.
JowettS.NtoumanisN. (2004). The Coach - Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART – Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245–257.
20.
JowettS.PaullG.PensgaardA. M. (2005). Coach-athlete relationship. In TaylorJ.WilsonG. S. (Eds.), Applying Sport Psychology: Four Perspectives (pp. 153–170). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
21.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Canada: Wiley.
22.
KelleyH. H.HolmesJ. G.KerrN. L.ReisH. T.RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
24.
KilpatrickS. D.BissonnetteV. L.RusbultC. E. (2002). Empathic accuracy and accommodative behavior among newly married couples. Personal Relationships, 9, 369–393.
25.
LorimerR. (2009). Coaches' satisfaction with their athletic partnerships. International Journal of Coaching Science, 3, 55–64.
26.
LyleJ. (2002). Sports coaching concepts: A framework for coaches' behaviour. London: Routledge.
27.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
28.
MontoyaM. R.NortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922.
29.
NezlekJ. B. (2003). Using multilevel random coefficient modeling to analyze social interaction diary data. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 437–469.
30.
NezlekJ. B. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 842–860.
31.
PierceR. G.SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (1996). Coping and social support. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Coping (pp. 434–451). New York: Wiley.
32.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
33.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
34.
RiemerH. A.ChelladuraiP. (1998). Development of the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 127–156.
35.
RusbultC. E.BuunkB. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.
36.
RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.CoolsenM. K.KirchnerJ. L. (2004). Interdependence, closeness, and relationships. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 137–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
ShortS. E.ShortM. W. (2005). Role of the coach in the coach–athlete relationship. The Lancet, 366, S29–S30.
38.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H (2007). The social psychology of groups (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
39.
WoodJ. T.DuckS. (1995). Off the beaten track: New shores for relationship research. In WoodJ.T.DuckS. (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 1–21). London: Sage.
40.
WeindbergR.RevelesM.JacksonA. (1984). Attitudes of male and female athletes toward male and female coaches. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 448–453.
41.
WrightP. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.
42.
WyllemanP. (2000). Interpersonal relationships in sport: Uncharted territory in sport psychology research. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 555–572.
