A study tested hypotheses derived from relational models theory on how four models — communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing — are used to structure relationships in different types of social groupings. Portuguese participants rated 10 relationships on the Modes of Relationships Questionnaire and reported their shared group memberships. The four-factor structure of the models was confirmed, and a bottom-up approach identified families, friendships, and organizations as the main distinct types of social groupings. The main results showed that relations within families combine mostly communal relations with authority between age groups, whereas relations in organizations combine mostly market relations with authority between age groups as well as professions. Friendships feature a mix of all models, except authority.
Asch, S.E. ( 1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Bandalos, D.L. ( 2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
5.
Biber, P., Hupfeld, J., & Meier, L.L., (2008). Personal values and relational models. European Journal of Personality, 22, 609-628.
6.
Bond, C.F., Jr., & Brockett, D.R. (1987). A social context-personality index theory of memory for acquaintances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1110-1121.
7.
Brito, P. ( 1995). The stillbirth of a Portuguese Bourgeoisie: Leading families of Porto, 1500-1580. Mediterranean Studies, 5.
8.
Caralis, D., & Haslam, N. ( 2004). Relational tendencies associated with broad personality dimensions. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77, 397-402.
9.
Earley, P.C. ( 2001). Understanding social motivation from an interpersonal perspective: organizational face theory. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 369-380). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
10.
Fiske, A.P. ( 1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: The Free Press.
11.
Fiske, A.P. ( 1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review , 99, 689-723.
12.
Fiske, A.P. ( 1993). Social errors in four cultures: Evidence about universal forms of social relations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 24, 463-494.
13.
Fiske, A.P. ( 2000). Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 76-94.
14.
Fiske, A.P. ( 2004). Four modes of constituting relationships: Consubstantial assimilation; space, magnitude, time and force; concrete procedures; abstract symbolism. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 61-146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Fiske, A.P., & Haslam, N. ( 1997). The structure of social substitutions: A test of relational models theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 725-729.
16.
Fiske, A.P., Haslam, N., & Fiske, S.T. ( 1991). Confusing one person with another: What errors reveal about the elementary form of social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 656-674.
17.
Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Nisbett, R.E. ( 1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 915-981). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Foa, U.G., & Foa, E.B. ( 1974). Social structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
19.
Gellner, E. ( 1987). The concept of kinship: and other essays on anthropological method and explanation. Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
Goodwin, R. ( 1999). Personal relationships across cultures. London: Routledge.
21.
Hall, R.J., Snell, A.F., & Singer Foust, M. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs . Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233-256.
22.
Haslam, N. ( 1994). Mental representation of social relationships: Dimensions, laws, or categories?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67, 575-584.
23.
Haslam, N. ( 1995). Factor structure of social relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 217-227.
24.
Haslam, N. ( 2004). Research on the relational models: An overview. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 27-57). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Haslam, N., & Fiske, A.P. ( 1999). Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis . Personal Relationships, 6, 241-250.
26.
Haslam, N., Reichert, T., & Fiske, A.P. ( 2002). Aberrant social relations in the personality disorders. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice , 75, 19-31.
27.
Horowitz, L.M. ( 2004). Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
28.
Iacoboni, M., Lieberman, M.D., Knowlton, B.J., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Moritz, M., Throop, C.J., & Fiske, A.P. ( 2004). Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline . NeuroImage, 21, 1167-1173.
29.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
30.
Koerner, A.F. ( 2006). Models of relating - not relationship models: Cognitive representations of relating across interpersonal relationship domains. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 629-653.
31.
Leary, T. ( 1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York: Ronald Press.
32.
Lévi-Strauss, C. ( 1949/1971). The elementary structures of kinship . Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
33.
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D.L., Lewis, A., Sherman, S.J., Wieczorkowska, G., Uhles, A.N. ( 2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
34.
Lickel, B., Rutchick, A.M., Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, S.J. ( 2006). Intuitive theories of group types and relational principles . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 28-39.
35.
Lieberman, D., Oum, R., & Kurzban, R. ( 2008). The family of fundamental social categories includes kinship: Evidence from the memory confusion paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 998-1012.
36.
Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. ( 2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
37.
Mills, J., & Clark, M.S. ( 1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (vol. 3, pp. 121-144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Oishi, S. ( 2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals with cultures. In E. F. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures (pp. 87-112). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
39.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses . Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
40.
Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. ( 1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 93-116.
41.
Realo, A., Kästik, L., & Allik, J. ( 2004). The relationship between collectivist attitudes and the elementary forms of human relations: Evidence from Estonia. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 779-794.
42.
Reinhard, W. ( 1979). Freunde und Kreaturen, ‘Verflechtung’ als Konzept zur Erförschung historischer Führungsgruppen: Römische Oligarchie um 1600 [Friends and creatures, ‘interlacement’ as a concept for the research of historical ruling groups: Roman oligarchy circa 1600]. Schriften der Philosophischen Fachbereiche der Universität Augsburg, Bd. 14. Munich.
43.
Schubert, T., Waldzus, S., & Seibt, B. ( 2008). The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact. In G. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 160-183). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Schwartz, S.H. ( 2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137-182.
45.
Shaver, P.R., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Attachment theory and research: Core concepts, basic principles, conceptual bridges. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 650-677). New York: The Guilford Press.
46.
Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D.P.S., & Gelfand, M.J. ( 1995). Horizontal and vertical aspects of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
47.
Tetlock, P.E., Kristel, O.V., Elson, S.E., Green, M.C., & Lerner, J.S. ( 2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.
48.
Tonnïes, F. ( 1887/2002). Community and society. Newton Abbot: Dover (originally published in German under the title Gemeinschaft und Gesselschaft).
49.
Vodosek, M. ( 2008). The correspondence between relational models and individualism and collectivism: Evidence from culturally diverse work groups. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 120-128.
50.
Wellman, B. ( 1987). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Whitehead, H.2002. Eager subjects, reluctant powers: The irrelevance of ideology in a secret New Guinea male cult. In J. Mageo (Ed.), Power and the self. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Wiggins, J.S. ( 2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
53.
Wilder, D., & Simon, A.F. ( 1998). Categorical and dynamic groups: Implications for social perception and intergroup behaviour. In C. Sedikes, J. Schopler, & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behaviour (pp. 27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Kaplan, S.B. ( 1976). Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409-420.
