The present study examined, via qualitative interviews, the experience of marital satisfaction across three cultures: the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, and Beijing, China. A total of 79 respondents were interviewed in the three cultures and template analysis with an emic approach was used as the analytic method. Results indicated that, in all three cultures, a stable relationship with the spouse, spousal support, partnership with the spouse, and stable family finances were important factors that contributed to marital satisfaction. Cultural differences also appeared. Companionship was more important for British respondents, while harmonious marital relations were more important for Hong Kong respondents. These findings were generally consistent with postulates from modernization theories and cultural value theories.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
2.
Baxter, L.A. ( 1990). Dialectic contradictions in relationship development . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69-88.
3.
Beck-Gernsheim, E. ( 1998/2002). Reinventing the family: In search of new lifestyles (P. Camiller, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
4.
Berry, J.W. ( 1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119-128.
5.
Bradbury, T.N., Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. ( 2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
6.
Census and Statistics Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR (2007). Demographic trends in Hong Kong 1981-2006. Retrieved April 7, 2008 from www.censtatd.gov.hk/products_and_services/products/publications/index.jsp
7.
Chan, H., & Lee, R.P.L. (1995). Hong Kong families: At the crossroads of modernism and traditionalism. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26, 83-99.
8.
Chen, X.X. ( 2003, March). Marriage and the family in rural and urban China . China Today, 52, 35-37.
9.
Conger, R.D., & Elder, G.H., Jr. (1994). Families in troubled times: The Iowa youth and families project. In R. D. Conger, & G. H. Elder, Jr. (eds), Troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America (pp. 3-19). New York: Aldine.
10.
Crabtree, B.F., & Miller, W.L. ( 1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (ed.), Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edn (pp. 163-177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Department for Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations ( 2005). Demographic Yearbook 2005. Retrieved April 7, 2008 from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2005.htm
12.
Dion, K.K., & Dion, K.L. ( 1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53-69.
13.
Dion, K.K., & Dion, K.L. ( 1996). Cultural perspective on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5-17.
14.
Fowers, B.J. ( 1991). His and her marriages: A multivariate study of gender and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24, 209-221.
15.
Giddens, A. ( 1993). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
16.
Goodwin, R. ( 2008). Changing relations: Achieving intimacy in a time of social transition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Hinde, R.A. ( 1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
18.
Hofstede, G. ( 2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
House, J.S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K.R. ( 1988). Structures and processes of social support. In W. R. Scott, & J. Blake (eds), Annual review of sociology (Vol. 14, pp. 293-318). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
20.
Inglehart, R.F., & Baker, W.E. ( 2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-52.
21.
Kagitcibasi, C. ( 1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 3: Social Behavior and applications (pp. 1-49). Needham Heights: MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
Kagitcibasi, C. ( 2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 36, 403-422.
23.
Kamo, Y. ( 1983). Determinants of marital satisfaction: A comparison of the United States and Japan. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 10, 551-568.
24.
King, N. ( 1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (eds), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (pp. 118-134). London, UK: Sage.
25.
Kvale, S. ( 1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
26.
Kwan, V.S.Y., Bond, M.H., & Singelis, T.M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
27.
Lee, P.W.H., Stewart, S.M., & Chan, K.K.C. ( 2006). Hong Kong, SAR China: Transitions and return to the motherland . In J. Georgas, J. W. Berry, F. J. R. van de Vijver, C. Kagitcibasi, & Y. H. Poortinga (eds), Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study (pp. 353-361). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Levine, R., Sato, S., Hashimoto, T., & Verma, J. ( 1995). Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 554-571.
29.
Locke, H.J., & Wallace, K.M. ( 1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
30.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. ( 1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
31.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. ( 1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London, UK: Sage Publications.
32.
Noller, P. ( 1996). "What is this thing called love?" Defining the love that supports marriage and family. Personal Relationships, 3, 97-115.
33.
Pimentel, E.E. ( 2000). Just how do I love thee?: Marital relations in urban China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 32-47.
34.
Riley, N.E. ( 1994). Interwoven lives: Parents, marriage, and guanxi in China . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 791-803.
35.
Schmitt, D.P., & Allik, J. ( 2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 89, 623-642.
36.
Schwartz, S.H. ( 2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (eds), Comparing cultures, dimensions of cultures in a comparative perspective (pp. 43-73). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
37.
Smith, P.B., Bond, M.H., & Kâgitçibaşi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures. London, UK: Sage.
38.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
39.
Stockman, N. ( 2000). Understanding Chinese society. Cambridge , UK: Polity Press.
40.
Yang, K.S. ( 1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 159-170.
41.
Yang, K.S. ( 1988). Will societal modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenges to social psychology (pp. 67-85). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
