Numerous factors affect the outcomes of supportive interactions, including aspects of the supportive message, the helper, the interaction context, and the recipient. This article proposes that the direct and interactive effects of these factors can be explained through a dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes, which provides a comprehensive, integrative treatment of when and why collections of variables in supportive interactions generate the effects they do. The article reviews some of factors that influence the outcomes of supportive interactions, explicates the dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes, illustrates the theory by describing recent studies designed to test it, and discusses aspects of the theory that need attention and directions for future research.
Barbee, A.P., & Cunningham, M.R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships . In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 381-413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Berlo, D.K. (1960). The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3.
Bodie, G.D. (2008). Explication and tests of a dual-process theory of supportive message outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
4.
Bodie, G.D., & Burleson, B.R. (2008). Explaining variations in the effects of supportive messages: A dual-process framework. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 354-398). New York: Routledge .
5.
Bullis, C., & Horn, C. (1995). Get a little closer: Further examination of nonverbal comforting strategies. Communication Reports, 8, 10-17.
6.
Burleson, B.R. (1994). Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 135-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Burleson, B.R. (2003). Emotional support skills. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551-594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Burleson, B.R. (2008). What counts as effective emotional support? Explorations of individual and situational differences. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 207-227). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Burleson, B.R. (in press). Explaining recipient responses to supportive messages: Development and tests of a dual-process theory. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Burleson, B.R., Albrecht, T.L., Goldsmith, D.J., & Sarason, I.G. (1994). The communication of social support. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. xi-xxx). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Burleson, B.R., Bodie, G.D., Holmstrom, A.J., Rack, J.J., Gill, J.N., Hanasono, L.K., et al. (2008, November). What women know and feel about social support that men don't: Two tests of a dual-process approach to explaining sex differences in responses to supportive messages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association , San Diego, CA.
12.
Burleson, B.R., Bodie, G.D., McCullough, J.D., Holmstrom, A.J., Rack, J.J., Gill, J.N., et al. (2008, July). Perceiving support from friends: Effects of message quality, perceived support availability, and problem severity on message evaluations. Paper presented at the biennial International Association for Relationship Research Conference, Providence, RI.
13.
Burleson, B.R., Bodie, G.D., Rack, J.J., Holmstrom, A.J., Hanasono, L., & Gill, J.N. (2007, November). Good grief: Testing a dual-process model of responses to grief-management messages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association , Chicago.
14.
Burleson, B.R., & Caplan, S.E. (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 230-286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
15.
Burleson, B.R., & Goldsmith, D.J. (1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals . In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245-280). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Burleson, B.R., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2002). Supportive communication . In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374-424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Burleson, B.R., McCullough, J.D., Bodie, G.D., Rack, J.J., Holmstrom, A.J., Hanasono, L.K., et al. (2008, May). It's how you think about it: Effects of ability and motivation on recipient processing of and responses to comforting messages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal .
18.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
20.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford .
21.
Christenfeld, N., Gerin, W., Linden, W., Sanders, M., Mathur, J., Diech, J.D., et al. (1997). Social support effects on cardiovascular reactivity: Is a stranger as effective as a friend? Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 388-398.
22.
Clark, R.A., Pierce, A.J., Finn, K., Hsu, K., Toosley, A., & Williams, L. (1998). The impact of alternative approaches to comforting, closeness of relationship, and gender on multiple measures of effectiveness . Communication Studies, 49, 224-239.
23.
Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B.H., & Underwood, L.G. (2000). Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 3-25). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Karmarck, T., & Hoberman, H.N. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. Sarason & B. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73-94). Dordrecht : Martinus Nijhoff.
25.
Cunningham, M.R., & Barbee, A.P. (2000). Social support. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 272-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Cutrona, C.E., Cohen, B.B., & Igram, S. (1990). Contextual determinants of the perceived helpfulness of helping behaviors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 7, 553-562.
27.
Cutrona, C.E., & Russell, D.W. (1990). Types of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason , I. G. Sarason & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York: Wiley.
28.
Dolin, D.J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (1993). Reach out and touch someone: Analysis of nonverbal comforting responses. Communication Quarterly, 41, 383-393.
29.
Donnelly, D.A., & Murray, E.J. (1991). Cognitive and emotional changes in written essays and therapy interviews. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 10, 334-350.
30.
Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Skokan, L.A. (1990). Determinants of social support provision in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 7, 437-450.
31.
Feng, B. (2009). Testing an integrated model of advice-giving in supportive interactions. Human Communication Research, 35, 115-129.
32.
Glynn, L.M., Christenfeld, N., & Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 234-242.
33.
Goldsmith, D.J. (1994). The role of facework in supportive communication . In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 29-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Goldsmith, D.J. (2004). Communicating social support. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Gottlieb, B.H. (1994). Social support. In A. L. Weber & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 307-324). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
Greenberg, L.S., Rice, L.N., & Elliott, R. (1993). Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process. New York: Guilford.
37.
Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R.G., Buunk, B.P., DeJong, G.M., Wobbes, T., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it most? Health Psychology, 19, 274-282.
38.
Holmstrom, A.J. (2008). The development and assessment of a cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
39.
Jacobson, D.E. (1986). Types and timing of social support. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 250-264.
40.
Jones, S.M., & Guerrero, L.A. (2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process . Human Communication Research, 27, 567-596.
41.
Jones, S.M., & Wirtz, J. (2007). "Sad monkey see, monkey do": Nonverbal matching in emotional support encounters. Communication Studies, 58, 71-86.
42.
MacGeorge, E.L., Feng, B., Butler, G.L., & Budarz, S.K. (2004). Understanding advice in supportive interactions: Beyond the facework and message evaluation paradigm. Human Communication Research, 30, 42-70.
43.
MacGeorge, E.L., Feng, B., & Thompson, E.R. (2008). "Good" and "bad" advice: How to advise more effectively. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 145-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
MacGeorge, E.L., Lichtman, R., & Pressey, L. (2002). The evaluation of advice in supportive interactions: Facework and contextual factors. Human Communication Research , 28, 451-463.
45.
Metts, S., Geist, P., & Gray, J.L. (1994). The role of relationship characteristics in the provision and effectiveness of supportive messages among nursing professionals . In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 229-246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Miczo, N., & Burgoon, J.K. (2008). Facework and nonverbal behavior in social support interactions within romantic dyads. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 245-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Moskowitz, G.B., Skurnik, I., & Galinsky, A.D. (1999). The history of dual-process notions, and the future of preconscious control. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 12-36). New York: Guilford.
48.
Neff, L.A., & Karney, B.R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79-90.
49.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1993). Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 561-570.
50.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York : Springer.
51.
Petty, R.E., Rucker, D.D., Bizer, G.Y., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2004). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 65-89). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
52.
Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
Pierce, G.R., Sarason, B.R., & Sarason, I.G. (1992). General and specific support expectations and stress as predictors of perceived supportiveness: An experimental study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 297-307.
54.
Rack, J.J., Burleson, B.R., Bodie, G.D., Holmstrom, A.J., & Servaty-Seib, H.L. (2008). Bereaved adults' evaluations of grief management messages: Effects of message person centeredness, recipient individual differences, and contextual factors. Death Studies , 32, 399-427.
55.
Sarason, B.R., Sarason, I.G., & Hacker, T.A. (1985). Concomitants of social support: Social skills, physical attractiveness, and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 469-480.
56.
Shaver, P. (2008, Spring). Some necessary links between communication studies and social psychology in research on close relationships. Relationship Research News, 6, 1-2.
57.
Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M.D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195-211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Uno, D., Uchino, B.N., & Smith, T.W. (2002). Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends on cardiovascular reactivity in women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 9, 243-262.
59.
Vessey, J.A., Carlson, K.L., & McGill, J. (1994). Use of distraction with children during an acute pain experience. Nursing Research , 43, 369-372.
60.
Winstead, B.A., Derlega, V.J., Lewis, R.J., Sanchez-Hucles, J., & Clarke, E. (1992). Friendship, social interaction, and coping with stress. Communication Research, 19, 193-211.
61.
Wright, K.B., & Bell, S.B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 39-54.
