Bidirectional models of interpersonal influence in parent—child relationships underscore the influence of children on their parents. Following a social constructionist perspective, the present study uses Q methodology to explore meanings and beliefs concerning children's influence among members of the Belgian-Flemish culture. Children and adults each performed the Q-sorting tasks that were analysed separately. Q-factor analysis of the children-sorts produced five factors and six factors for the adults. These analyses revealed that a central understanding of children's influence for children and adults is the recognition of the full person and partnership of the child in the relationship. Children's responses focus on the responsiveness of the parents and stress that parents learn from them. Adults' responses emphasize the massiveness of children's influence on the parents' personal development.
Ambert, A.M. (2001). The effect of children on parents. New York: The Haworth Press.
2.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective . Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
3.
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, R. (1967). The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
4.
Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vansant, I., & Moors, E. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 351-365.
5.
Brown, S.R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Brown, S.R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 561-567.
7.
Bugental, D.B., & Johnston, C. (2000). Parental and child cognitions in the context of the family. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 315-344.
8.
Collins, W.A., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal context . In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. Lerner, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social and personality development (pp. 1003-1067). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (Eds.). (2003). Children's influence on family dynamics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
10.
Cummings, M.E., & Schermerhorn, A.C. (2003). A developmental perspective on children as agents in the family. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 91-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Deaux, K., & Philogène, G. (Eds.). (2001). Representations of the social . Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
De Mol, J., & Buysse, A. (in press). The phenomenology of children's influence on parents. Journal of Family Therapy.
13.
Dix, T., & Branca, S.H. (2003). Parenting as a goal-regulation process. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 167-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
Gergen, K.J. (1994). Realities and relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Gergen, K.J. (2001). Social construction in context. London: SAGE.
16.
Grusec, J.E. (1997). A history of research on parenting strategies and children's internalization of values. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and the internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 3-22). New York: Wiley.
17.
Grusec, J.E., & Goodnow, J.J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view . Developmental Psychology, 30, 4-19.
18.
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?London: Harvard University Press.
19.
Hinde, R.A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. Hove: Psychology Press.
20.
Holden, G.W., & Hawk, K.H. (2003). Meta-parenting in the journey of child rearing: A cognitive mechanism for change. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent- child relations (pp. 189-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
Huston, T.L. (2002). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berschied, A. Christensen, J. Harvey , T. L. Huston, G. Levinger et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169-219). New York: Freeman.
22.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2001). Social representations, public life, and social construction. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 165-182). Oxford: Blackwell .
23.
Kent, D., & Pepler, D. (2003). The aggressive child as agent in coercive family processes. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 131-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2003). Parenting of adolescents: Action or reaction? In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Children's influence on family dynamics (pp. 121-151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Khanh, T.D., & Huong, H.N. (2006). The effects of acculturative variables on Asian American parent-child relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 407-426.
26.
Kuczynski, L. (Ed.) (2003). Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Kuczynski, L., Harach, L., & Bernardini, S.C. (1999). Psychology's child meets sociology's child: Agency, power and influence in parent-child relations. In C. Shehan (Ed.), Through the eyes of the child: Re-visioning children as active agents of family life (pp. 21-52). Stanford, CT: JAI.
28.
Kuczynski, L., Lollis, S., & Koguchi, Y. (2003). Reconstructing common sense: Metaphors of bidirectionality in parent-child relations. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 421-437). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
Kuczynski, L., & Navara, G.S. (2006). Sources of innovation and change in socialization, internalization and acculturation. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 299-327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, M. (2006). Agency and bidirectionality in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization. New York: Guilford.
31.
Lawrence, J.A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150-167.
32.
Lee, N. (1998). Towards an immature sociology. The Sociological Review, 46, 458-482.
33.
Lollis, S., & Kuczynski, L. (1997). Beyond one hand clapping: Seeing bidirectionality in parent-child relations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 441-461.
34.
Maccoby, E.E. (2003). Dynamic viewpoints on parent-child relations: Their implications for socialization processes. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 439-452). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
Markus, H.R., & Plaut, V.C. (2001). Social representations: Catching a good idea. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 183-189). Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
Morrow, V. (2003). Perspectives on children's agency within families: A view from the sociology of childhood. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 109-129). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
Palkovitz, R., Marks, L.D., Appleby, D.W., & Holmes, E.K. (2003). Parenting and adult development: Contexts, processes, ad products of intergenerational relationships. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 307-323). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
Patterson, G.R., & Fisher, P.A. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: Bidirectional effects, causal models, and the search for parsimony. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 59-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
39.
Parke, R.D. (2002). Parenting in the new millennium: Prospects, promises, and pitfalls. In J. P. McHale & W. S. Grolnick (Eds.), Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families (pp. 65-93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
Pearce, W.B. (1995). A sailing guide for social constructionist. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 88-113). New York: Guilford.
41.
Pettit, G.S., & Lollis, S. (1997). Introduction to special issue: Reciprocity and bidirectionality in parent-child relationships: New approaches to the study of enduring issues. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 14, 435-440.
42.
Risdon, A., Eccleston, C., Crombez, G., & McCracken, L. (2003). How can we learn to live with pain? A Q-methodological analysis of diverse understandings of acceptance of chronic pain. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 375-386.
43.
Schmolck, P. (2000). PQ method. Downloaded from http:www.rzunibwmuenchen.de/~p41bsmk/qmethod.
44.
Smetana, J. (1997). Parenting and the development of social knowledge reconceptualized: A social domain analysis. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and the internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 162-192). New York: Wiley.
45.
Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 178-192). London: SAGE.
46.
Stenner, P.H., Dancey, C.P., & Watts, S. (2000). The understanding of their illness amongst people with irritable bowel syndrome: A Q methodological study. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 439-452.
47.
Trevarthen, C., & Aitkin, K.J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 3-48.
48.
Valsiner, J., Branco, A.U., & Dantas, C.M. (1997). Co-construction of human development: Heterogeneity within parental belief orientations. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and the internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 283-304). New York: Wiley.
49.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation . Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67-91.
