This study explored the profiles of the congruence and incongruence between adult children’s mate preferences and parents’ in-law preferences, as well as how parenting and parent-child relationship quality predicted these profiles. We recruited 299 Chinese parent-child dyads, with adult children aged 18–29. Participants completed self-reported measures on (perceived) parenting styles, parent-child relationship quality. Adult children reported their mate preferences, while parents reported in-law preferences. We used latent profile analysis to classify profiles based on the combination of adult children’s mate preferences and parents’ in-law preferences, identifying five subgroups: Congruent-Low Standards, Incongruent-Parent Idealist, Congruent-Resource De-emphasis, Congruent-Resource Emphasis, and Incongruent-Child Gene Emphasis. The predictors of both parents’ and children’s (perceived) parenting styles, and parent-child relationship quality differed across the profiles. This study provided initial exploration of the profiles of parent-child congruence and incongruence in adult children’s mate preferences, shedding light on the associations between these profiles and parenting and parent-child relationship quality. We further discussed the practical implications of the findings.
AgeyE.MorrisA.ChandyM.GaulinS. J. C. (2021). Arranged marriage often subverts offspring mate choice: An HRAF‐based study. American Anthropologist, 123(4), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13656
ApostolouM. (2008b). Parent-offspring conflict over mating: The case of family background. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600310
4.
ApostolouM. (2010). Parental choice: What parents want in a son-in-law and a daughter-in-law across 67 pre-industrial societies. British Journal of Psychology, 101(Pt 4), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X480634
5.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus web notes, 21(2), 1–22.
6.
BauerD. J.ShanahanM. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (Vol. 21, pp. 255–283). Psychology Press.
7.
BaumrindD. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43–88.
8.
BaumrindD. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 1–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372
9.
BaumrindD. (2013). Authoritative parenting revisited: History and current status. In LarzelereR. E.MorrisA. S.HarristA. W. (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 11–34). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13948-002
10.
BiX.YangY.LiH.WangM.ZhangW.Deater-DeckardK. (2018). Parenting styles and parent–adolescent relationships: The mediating roles of behavioral autonomy and parental authority. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02187
11.
BotwinM. D.BussD. M.ShackelfordT. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x
12.
BuH.LiuI. K. F.QuD.ZhouY.YuN. X. (2023). (In) congruence in child–mother relationships and depressive symptoms in cross-boundary families. Journal of Family Psychology, 37(7), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001115
BuunkA. P.ParkJ. H.DubbsS. L. (2008). Parent–offspring conflict in mate preferences. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.47
17.
ChanK. W.ChanS. M. (2007). Hong Kong teacher education students’ goal orientations and their relationship to perceived parenting styles. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066636
18.
ChangL.LuH. J.ZhuX. Q. (2017). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers and mothers: The withholding of parental investment by married couples. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000086
19.
ChangL.WangY.ShackelfordT. K.BussD. M. (2011). Chinese mate preferences: Cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.016
20.
ChenY. (2022, December). The psychological impact of authoritarian parenting on children and the youth. In 2022 2nd International Conference on Modern Educational Technology and Social Sciences (ICMETSS 2022) (pp. 888–896). Atlantis Press.
21.
ChenW.-W. (2014). The relationship between perceived parenting style, filial piety, and life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(3), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036819
22.
ChenW. W.WuC. W.YehK. H. (2016). How parenting and filial piety influence happiness, parent–child relationships and quality of family life in Taiwanese adult children. Journal of Family Studies, 22(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1027154
23.
CheungF.LunV. M. C.NgoH. Y.FongE. (2020). Seeking harmony in Chinese families: A dyadic analysis on Chinese parent‒child relations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12393
24.
CheungR. Y. (2021). Constructive interparental conflict and child adjustment in the Chinese context: A moderated mediation model of emotional security and disintegration avoidance. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(3), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01851-w
25.
DarlingN.SteinbergL. (2017). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. In ZukauskieneR. D. (Ed.), Interpersonal development (pp. 161–170). Routledge.
26.
DialloT. M.MorinA. J.LuH. (2016). Impact of misspecifications of the latent variance–covariance and residual matrices on the class enumeration accuracy of growth mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1169188
27.
DriscollK.PiantaR. C. (2011). Mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of conflict and closeness in parent-child relationships during early childhood. Journal of Early Childhood & Infant Psychology, 7, 1–24.
28.
EradusM.LeijtenP.Melendez-TorresG. J.FooX. Q.OliverB. R. (2024). Parental differential warmth, hostility, and sibling differences in internalizing and externalizing behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 38(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001194
29.
EssizO.MandrikC. (2022). Intergenerational influence on sustainable consumer attitudes and behaviors: Roles of family communication and peer influence in environmental consumer socialization. Psychology and Marketing, 39(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21540
30.
FergusonS. L.MooreG.HullD. M. (2020). Finding latent groups in observed data: A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419881721
31.
FevreR.GuimarãesI.ZhaoW. (2020). Parents, individualism and education: Three paradigms and four countries. The Review of Education, 8(3), 693–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3204
32.
FugèreM. A.CiccarelliN. C.CousinsA. J. (2023). The importance of physical attractiveness and ambition/intelligence to the mate choices of women and their parents. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 18(4), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000325
33.
FugèreM. A.MaddenS.CousinsA. J. (2019). The relative importance of physical attractiveness and personality characteristics to the mate choices of women and their fathers. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(4), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00195-z
34.
GongJ.ZhouY.WangY.LiangZ.HaoJ.SuL.WangY.DuX. (2022). How parental smartphone addiction affects adolescent smartphone addiction: The effect of the parent-child relationship and parental bonding. Journal of Affective Disorders, 307, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.014
35.
GoodmanM.WatersS. F.ThompsonR. A. (2012). Parent–offspring conflict. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 28–33). Academic Press.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00267-6
36.
GrusecJ. E.GoodnowJ. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4
37.
GrusecJ. E.GoodnowJ. J.KuczynskiL. (2000). New directions in analyses of parenting contributions to children's acquisition of values. Child Development, 71(1), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00135
38.
GuoQ.LiY.YuS. (2017). In-law and mate preferences in Chinese society and the role of traditional cultural values. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(3), Article 147470491773051. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917730518
39.
HippJ. R.BauerD. J. (2006). Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.36
40.
HoD. Y. (2023). Filial piety scale and traditional Chinese values. In ChristianU. K.MohsenA.OlegN. M. (Eds.), International handbook of behavioral health assessment (pp. 1–29). Springer International Publishing.
41.
HouJ.ShuT.FangX. (2020). Influence of resources on cue preferences in mate selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 574168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574168
42.
HuangK. J.ChenJ. H. (2024). Filial piety and the development of independence and interdependence during emerging adulthood: A longitudinal study of Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(5), 1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01929-w
43.
HwangW.JungE. (2021). Parenting practices, parent–child relationship, and perceived academic control in college students. Journal of Adult Development, 28(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-020-09346-0
44.
JohncoC. J.MagsonN. R.FardoulyJ.OarE. L.ForbesM. K.RichardsonC.RapeeR. M. (2021). The role of parenting behaviors in the bidirectional and intergenerational transmission of depression and anxiety between parents and early adolescent youth. Depression and Anxiety, 38(12), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23197
45.
LarzelereR. E.MorrisA. S. E.HarristA. W. (2013). Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development. American Psychological Association.
46.
LavričM.NatererA. (2020). The power of authoritative parenting: A cross-national study of effects of exposure to different parenting styles on life satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, Article 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105274
47.
LockeK. D.MastorK. A.MacDonaldG.BarniD.MorioH.ReyesJ. A. S.Vargas-FloresJ. D.Ibanez-ReyesJ.KambleS.OrtizF. A. (2020). Young adults' partner preferences and parents' in-law preferences across generations, genders, and nations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(5), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2662
48.
LuH. J.ZhuX. Q.ChangL. (2015). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000048
49.
LyuD.ZhangL. R.ChenW.-W. (2025). From parent to partner: The mediating role of self-perceived mate value in parenting and mate preferences. Journal of Adult Development, 32(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-024-09511-9
50.
MaccobyE. E.MartinJ. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In MussenP. H. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 1–101). Wiley.
51.
MastrotheodorosS.Van der GraaffJ.DekovićM.MeeusW. H. J.BranjeS. (2019). Parent–adolescent conflict across adolescence: Trajectories of informant discrepancies and associations with personality types. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01054-7
52.
PopM. V.RusuA. S. (2019). Couple relationship and parent-child relationship quality: Factors relevant to parent-child communication on sexuality in Romania. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030386
53.
SanoY.MammenS.HoughtenM. (2021). Well-being and stability among low-income families: A 10-year review of research. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 42(Suppl 1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-020-09715-7
54.
SmetanaJ. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131579
55.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM. (2023). Studying parenting in adolescence from a dynamic perspective: The case of autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2023.2282647
56.
SpurkD.HirschiA.WangM.ValeroD.KauffeldS. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
57.
TehraniH. D.YaminiS.VazsonyiA. T. (2024). Parenting styles and big five personality traits among adolescents: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 216, Article 112421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112421
58.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Aldine Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129266-7
59.
TrommsdorffG.KornadtH. J. (2003). Parent-child relations in cross-cultural perspective. In KuczynskiL. (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 271–306). Sage.
60.
ValentineK. A.LiN. P.MeltzerA. L.TsaiM. H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219855048
WangY.QianX.TianQ.GaoJ.LiX. (2018). Parent-child relationship and the comparison between parents and their children on their children’s mate preference. Acta Psychology Sinica, 50(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00091
63.
WellerB. E.BowenN. K.FaubertS. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932
64.
WilliamsK. E.CiarrochiJ. (2020). Perceived parenting styles and values development: A longitudinal study of adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(2), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12542
65.
WilsonN.MinnisH.McDaidS.PearceA. (2025). Household income and children’s mental health outcomes: The mediating role of maternal wellbeing and parent–child relationship quality. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02765-y
66.
YaffeY. (2023). Maternal and paternal authoritarian parenting and adolescents’ impostor feelings: The mediating role of parental psychological control and the moderating role of child’s gender. Children, 10(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020308
67.
ZhangL. R.ChenW.-W. (2020). The mediating role of parental influence on the relationship between adult children’s filial piety beliefs and mate preferences. Evolutionary Psychology, 18(4), Article 147470492096911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704920969110
68.
ZhangL. R.LamK. K. L.ChenW.-W. (2024). Parent–child discrepancies in mate preferences: A three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(4), 924–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12588
69.
ZhangX. (2011). Parent–child and teacher–child relationships in Chinese preschoolers: The moderating role of preschool experiences and the mediating role of social competence. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.09.001
70.
ZhaoZ.SuW.HouJ. (2023). The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: An eye tracking study. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 444. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01487-7
71.
ZhouN.LiX.ZangN.BuehlerC.CaoH.LiangY.DengL. (2021). Interparental hostility interacts with interparental cooperative conflict to predict adolescent social competence through parent–child relationship quality. Family Process, 60(3), 984–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12606
