Past research suggests that relationship quality is low in “precarious couples,” those in which the woman is both critical and more verbally disinhibited than her male partner. Such diminished relationship quality may compromise the capacity of precarious couples to cope with stressors. To test this hypothesis, we exposed 67 married women to an experimentally induced stressor, reunited them with their husbands, and examined the subsequent physiological reactions of both partners. Interacting with one's spouse after the stress-induction procedure resulted in relatively low heart rates among most people, but men in precarious couples displayed elevated levels of arousal. Apparently, for men in precarious couples, interacting with a recently stressed partner is itself stressful, which could ultimately compromise physical health.
Allen, K.M., Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, R.M. (1991). Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 582—589.
2.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H.T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 193—281). New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Carli, L.L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941—951.
4.
Carli, L.L., LaFleur, S.J., & Loeber, C.C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030—1041.
5.
Carrére, S., & Gottman, J.M. (1999). Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Processes , 38, 293—301.
6.
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C.L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73—81.
7.
Coombs, R.H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: A literature review. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 40, 97—102.
8.
De La Ronde, C., & Swann, W.B. Jr. (1998). Partner verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 374—382.
9.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1999). Sexism and other “isms”: Interdependence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In W. B. Swann, J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 193—221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
Goldman, N., Koreman, S., & Weinstein, R. (1995). Marital status and health among the elderly. Social Science and Medicine, 40(12), 1717—1730.
11.
Gottman, J.M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review ofPsychology, 49, 169—197.
12.
Gottman, J.M. & Krokoff, L.J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47—52.
13.
Heavey, C.L., Christensen, A., & Malamuth, N.M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 797—801.
14.
Holmes, T.H., & Rahe, R.H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213—218.
15.
Horwitz, A.V., White, H.R., & Howell-White, S. (1996). Becoming married and mental health: A longitudinal study of a cohort of young adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 895—907.
16.
John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 102—138). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
Juster, F.T., & Suzman, R. (1995). An overview of the health and retirement study . Journal of Human Resources, 30, S7—S56.
18.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., & Newton T. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin,127, 472—503.
19.
Klohnen, E.C., & Mendelsohn, G. (1998). Partner selection for personality characteristics: A couple-centered approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 268—278.
20.
Krantz, D.S., & Falconer, J.J. (1997). Measurement of cardiovascular response. In S. Cohen, R. C. Kessler, & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 193—212). New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Marks, N.F., & Lambert, J.D. (1998). Marital status continuity and change among young and midlife adults: Longitudinal effects on psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 652—686.
22.
Murray, S.L., Holmes, J.G., & Griffin, D.W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79—98.
23.
Prior, P.M., & Hayes, B.C. (2003). The relationship between marital status and health: An empirical investigation of differences in bed occupancy within health and social care facilities in Britain, 1921—1991. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 124—148.
24.
Robins, R.W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. (2002). It's not just who you're with, it's who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 925—964.
25.
Robles, T.F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology and Behavior, 79, 409—416.
26.
Ross, C.E., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1990). The impact of the family on health: The decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1059—1078.
27.
Rudman, L.A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743—762.
28.
Sattel, J.W. (1976). The inexpressive male: Tragedy or sexual politics?Social Problems, 23, 469—477.
29.
Simon, R.W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 1065—1096.
30.
Simpson, J.A., Rholes, W.S., & Nelligan, J.S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434—446.
31.
Simpson, J.A., Rholes, W.S., & Orina, M.M. (2002). Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 598—608.
32.
Simpson, J.A., Rholes, W.S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71, 899—914.
33.
Snydersmith, M.A., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1992). Parsing complex social factors to determine component effects: I. Autonomic activity and reactivity as a function of human association. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 263—278.
34.
Swann, W.B., Jr., & Angulo, S. (2006). Female-demand, male-withdraw in precarious couples. Manuscript in preparation, University of Texas at Austin .
35.
Swann W.B.Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J.G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 66, 857—869.
36.
Swann, W.B., Jr., & Rentfrow, P.J. (2001). Blirtatiousness: Cognitive, behavioral and physiological consequences of rapid responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1160—1175.
37.
Swann, W.B., Jr., Rentfrow, P.J., & Gosling, S.G. (2003). The precarious couple effect: Verbally inhibited men + critical, disinhibited women = bad chemistry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 1095—1106.
38.
Swann, W.B., Jr., Sellers, J.G., & McClarty, K.L. (2006). Tempting today, troubling tomorrow: The roots of the precarious couple effect?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 93—103.
39.
Uchino, B.N., Cacioppo, J.T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin,19, 488—531.
40.
Willerman, L., Turner, R.G., & Peterson, M. (1976). A comparison of the predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality , 10, 482—492.
